Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

("Warren Farrell Running for Governor!!" On "His Side with Glenn Sacks" tonight! Call in!)
Warren Farrell & His Friends ^ | 16AUG03 | Warren Farrell

Posted on 08/16/2003 10:31:46 PM PDT by familyop

Please, read my comment after the following! Farrell does *not* speak for us!

======================

"'Top Ten List' and Campaign Action Photos"

August 14, 2003

Dear Friends,

Here's my gubernatorial campaign's first press release -- just off the press! (See the Top Ten List.)

And you can now access my Gubernatorial web site directly: www.warrenfarrell.com/gov. (Enjoy the Action Photos.)

Would you let me know if these make my purposes clear?

Exhausted in California, Warren

Contact: Ph: 760 753 5000 E: warren@w... Web: www.warrenfarrell.com or www.warrenfarrell.com/gov

POLITICALLY INCORRECT AUTHOR ENTERS POLITICS Fathers' Issues Author Wants to be "Governor for Kids"

CARLSBAD, Calif. Dr. Warren Farrell has officially launched his candidacy for California Governor. His campaign will focus on reducing the economic costs of social neglect, such as when children lose their dads after divorce.

Dr. Farrell is running because he feels that although his recent research, in books such as Father and Child Reunion and Why Men Are The Way They Are, has uncovered findings that can alleviate the state's budget crisis, they are too politically incorrect for mainstream candidates to discuss. Thus the policy implications are overlooked. For example:

* why children raised by single dads do better than children raised by single moms; * why men now earn less money than women for the same work; * why our sons now do worse in school than our daughters…

In a normal election, no candidate would say these things. Thus no one would discover, for example, that children raised by single dads do better than children raised by single moms in part because both parents are more likely to be involved when the dads are the primary care taker than vice versa.

Dr. Farrell, with his M.A. and Ph.D. in Political Science (UCLA; NYU), links his research to budgetary solutions for California. For example, a court system biased against dads after divorce leads to our daughters being far more likely to become unwed teenage moms, and to more rape, homicide, and suicide that in turn costs California billions in costs for prisons, courts and social services.

Dr. Farrell feels the pendulum has swung from a "women's crisis" to a "men's crisis" that is wasting our human resources just as the energy crisis wasted our natural resources.

What are the solutions? Here are Dr. Farrell's "Top Ten Social Solutions with Budget Saving Results" that transcend Democratic and Republican Party lines.

Top Ten Social Solutions that Create Financial Solutions

1. a men's birth control pill and a paternity fraud bill; 2. universal prenatal care; 3. listening skills taught from first grade, with simultaneous retraining of parents; 4. equal father and mother involvement, especially if there is divorce; 5. more male teachers; 6. stressing female empowerment rather than victim power 7. keeping taxes on businesses low 8. schools that are friendlier to boys; 9. a commission on the status of men and men's health 10. restraining the Government-as-Substitute-Husband

The Financial Times of London has selected Dr. Farrell as one of the world's top 100 "Thought Leaders." He has consulted with many Fortune 500 companies, as well as with NASA, the US Departments of Energy, Education and HUD. These proposals reflect Dr. Farrell's experience running his own business for a quarter century.

For all his provocative research, then, Warren Farrell sees himself not only as a bridge between Democrats and Republicans, but also between men and women. For most candidates those are pipe dreams, but in his case, listening to both sexes led Warren to three years on the Board of the National Organization for Women in New York City; to expert witness work that keeps children of divorce with both parents; and to his addressing both Governor Wilson's Conference on Fathers, and his Conference on Women. For Farrell, "Just as the tension between Democrats and Republicans provides checks and balances that create a better country, so the tension between men and women provides checks and balances that create a better family."

In this election, Dr. Farrell says, "the press has a chance to interview candidates who don't have to speak from both sides of our mouths. Like the Internet, this election is another gold rush, but finding the gold takes some panning."

For more information (e.g., on how his "top ten" list would alleviate the budget crisis, or why men now earn less money than women for the same work, or why our sons now do worse in school than our daughters…) call 760 753 5000. Or try www.warrenfarrell.com/gov.


TOPICS: Announcements; Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: california; conservative; democrat; election; family; fatherhood; fathers; feminist; left; libertinefeminazis; right; ruin; warrenfarrell; whackos
HELP!

Warren Farrell does *not* speak for me! He's running on the Rat ticket!

Most fatherhood/family activists are very conservative. We are *not* with Farrell! Please, call in to Glenn Glenn Sacks' radio show (California & Washington state - see URL below) and ask Glenn or Warren about Warren's agenda for "gun control," "gay rights," etc.! Ask about what the heck his number "3," in the "top ten list," "listening skills taught from first grade, with simultaneous retraining of parents" means.

See these behind the following URL!

http://warrenfarrell.com/gov/inthenews.htm

The radio show is tonight (Sunday) at 11:00pm, at 870 in Los Angeles on the AM dial!

Sacks' "His Side" call-in number is 1-866-870-KRLA

Thank you for calling in to Glenn's show to have him ask Warren (or to ask him yourself) about those three things. You'll do fathers and families a great deed.

Again, Farrell does not speak for us, and NCFM obviously does not know his stance on "gun control," "gay rights," "retraining of parents" and so forth!

1 posted on 08/16/2003 10:31:47 PM PDT by familyop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: familyop
That's

http://warrenfarrell.com/gov/inthenews.htm

and that particular Web page is *not* going out to fathers' rights advocates. He's sent them a URL to a page with less information (only pro-father, pro-family, pseudo- conservative info).

BTW, conservative fatherhood advocates (mostly divorced and many married) put up a large vote for President Bush and might soon be a more identifiable resource (news sites just now started to get a lot of traffic, for example MensNewsDaily.com).

2 posted on 08/16/2003 10:45:49 PM PDT by familyop (Essayons.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: familyop
I guess you need a tutorial on what is defined as breaking news.
3 posted on 08/16/2003 10:50:51 PM PDT by Lunatic Fringe (When news breaks, we fix it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lunatic Fringe
"I guess you need a tutorial on what is defined as breaking news."

Darn. I couldn't delete that one, either, but did manage
to add the keyword, "LibertineFeminazi."
4 posted on 08/16/2003 11:01:48 PM PDT by familyop (Essayons.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: familyop
If I thought he could win, Warren Farrell would get my nod. And it would be a vote to drive the NOW feminazis up the walls!
5 posted on 08/16/2003 11:19:13 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
I understand the alternate strategy and won't argue about
it much. But there is one more thing (besides the man's
stuff on "gun control," etc., behind the URL in my comment
after the post, above). He lost the suit against Liz &
co. CA NOW is raring to turn loose with the word that Liz
was spewing. ...seems to me that's gonna really hurt
everyone even beyond his agendas for "gun control," "gay
rights" (re. the problem with lesbians yanking custody from
dads), "retraining of parents" and so forth. What he's
doing to us, IMO, (his good intentions considered), is
going to hurt us all (and our kids) more than Liz hurt
him (not to mention the rest of us). That Liz's accusation
was garbage is beside the point of what will happen in
practice, IMO.
6 posted on 08/16/2003 11:32:18 PM PDT by familyop (Essayons.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
And how did the CA NOW witches know about it several days before we did?

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FAMILYCOURTREFORM/message/15034

and the Liz thing coming again.

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FAMILYCOURTREFORM/message/15078

7 posted on 08/16/2003 11:49:42 PM PDT by familyop (Essayons.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson