Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Teacher317
Drip all you like, but try not to get any of it on your bare skin. Having term limits didn't stop Clinton for selling the country out to the Chinese, did it?

If the country had wanted Ronald Reagan for a third term, why shouldn't we have been able to elect him? I don't have to tell you that we would have been able to up until the mid-twentieth century.

During the previous two hundred years, how many life-long tyrants did we have? BTW, something fifty years old in a two-century old republic isn't really 'a tradition.'
104 posted on 11/19/2003 8:04:27 PM PST by gcruse (http://gcruse.typepad.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]


To: gcruse
Why shouldn't we have had Reagan for three terms. Because we have a law that prohibits that. We could just as easily have had Clinton for 3 or 4 terms, no thanks.

Don't want a naturalized citizen either, that is unconstitutional and for good reason.
106 posted on 11/19/2003 9:41:33 PM PST by ladyinred (Talk about a revolution, look at California!!! We dumped Davis!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson