Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

92 Cases Reveal Court's Outlook on Guns
Sierra Times ^ | 8/10/2003

Posted on 08/11/2003 7:52:00 PM PDT by John Farson

Phoenix, Ariz. The results of a six-year study of Supreme Court gun cases will be released in September and has uncovered scores of forgotten decisions that affect the highly contested Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms.

Co-written by an attorney who has won three cases before the High Court, along with the research director of a prominent think tank, and a nationally recognized gun-law expert, the researchers conclude from the evidence that the Supreme Court has recognized an individual right to arms for most of the past two centuries.

Among the key findings in "Supreme Court Gun Cases," being released next month by Phoenix-based Bloomfield Press:

- The Court has not been quiet on this subject as previously thought, using some form of the word "gun" in its decisions 2,910 times (gun, rifle, pistol, shotgun, firearm, etc., even Winchester five times) in 92 cases. Three dozen of the cases quote or mention the Second Amendment directly.

- Armed self defense with personally owned firearms is recognized and supported in more than a dozen cases, is a distinct right of American citizens, and an ancient "duty to retreat" is not obligatory.

- The often-cited Miller case from 1939 is inconclusive, which is why gun-rights and gun-control advocates both claim it supports their position. The record shows that the Court actually remanded this case back to the lower court for retrial and a hearing on the evidence, since there was no evidence presented. Because Miller had been murdered by that time and his co-defendant had taken a plea agreement, no retrial or evidentiary hearing was ever held.

- All 92 cases are reproduced to show what the Court has actually said. More than 1,000 interesting quotations are highlighted, and each case includes a plain-English description. A special "descriptive index" reduces each case to the firearms-related question(s) it answers.

Advanced review copies of "Supreme Court Gun Cases" are available to the news media on request. Contact Bloomfield Press at 1-800-996-4020 or SCGC@gunlaws.com.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government
KEYWORDS: banglist

1 posted on 08/11/2003 7:52:01 PM PDT by John Farson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: tpaine
ping
2 posted on 08/11/2003 7:52:28 PM PDT by John Farson (Live free or die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: *bang_list
BANG!

Travis McGee, posting from off-site, back home tomorrow.

3 posted on 08/11/2003 7:54:54 PM PDT by maica (Land of the Free, because of the Brave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Farson
I hope they provide complimentary copies to the current members of the court.
4 posted on 08/11/2003 7:58:12 PM PDT by umgud (gov't has more money than it needs, but never as much as it wants)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Farson
"Will be made to the media on request." 0 requests wouldn't surprise me an iota.
5 posted on 08/11/2003 8:02:07 PM PDT by Waco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Farson
Try this list:

http://www-2.cs.cmu.edu/afs/cs/user/wbardwel/public/nfalist/supreme_cases.html
6 posted on 08/11/2003 8:23:08 PM PDT by Shooter 2.5 (Don't punch holes in the lifeboat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shooter 2.5
Typical right-wing tactic - confuse the issue with facts.
7 posted on 08/11/2003 8:37:56 PM PDT by Old Professer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: John Farson
BLOAT BANG
8 posted on 08/11/2003 9:24:22 PM PDT by alphadog (die commie scum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AnnaZ; HangFire; gc4nra; Mr.B.goes.to.Washington; Lady Jenn
some light reading???
9 posted on 08/11/2003 9:28:59 PM PDT by Feiny (We have a pool and a pond....a pond would be good for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Farson
Bada-Bing! Bada-BOOM!
10 posted on 08/11/2003 9:37:05 PM PDT by steplock (www.FOCUS.GOHOTSPRINGS.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Farson
Bada-Bing! Bada-BOOM!
11 posted on 08/11/2003 9:37:05 PM PDT by steplock (www.FOCUS.GOHOTSPRINGS.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Farson
bttt
12 posted on 08/11/2003 9:45:02 PM PDT by Badray (Molon Labe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Farson
This makes me a bit more hopeful that the amicus brief filed by Second Amendment Sisters re Silveria V Locklear will have a better chance when it reaches the SC.
13 posted on 08/11/2003 9:55:35 PM PDT by basil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: umgud
What you said!
14 posted on 08/12/2003 1:19:54 PM PDT by MileHi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: John Farson
Yeah, right! And next you'll be telling me Global Warming is not man-made. :)
15 posted on 08/12/2003 1:29:33 PM PDT by asformeandformyhouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson