To: CodeWeasel
Big news!
2 posted on
08/11/2003 12:45:22 PM PDT by
sauropod
(Graduate: Burt Gummer's Survival School)
To: CodeWeasel
There's plenty in the tax code that requires you to pay it. I think the dispute is over whether or not the ammendment that makes income tax legal was really ratified properly. There's a guy that has been selling books on this issue for decades...
4 posted on
08/11/2003 12:50:02 PM PDT by
College Repub
(http://www.theskyiscrape.com)
To: CodeWeasel
So all you have to do is not pay taxes, get pulled into court, get judged by 12 "peers" and you're home free? Sounds way too easy to me. </sarcasm>
5 posted on
08/11/2003 12:50:26 PM PDT by
Pest
To: CodeWeasel
She still owes the money. The jury found her not guilty on the criminal charges of evasion, etc.
To: CodeWeasel
Already posted
here. First post didn't have original title.
12 posted on
08/11/2003 1:59:37 PM PDT by
TomServo
("Cinematography by Zapruder.")
To: CodeWeasel
This is the Sixth District (6th District). I wonder if it can be used as case law precedent in other districts besides the 6th.
I think Kuglin's probably on leave from her job because the IRS has bullied FedEx into withholding more of her wages if she returns. Also, now that the IRS has come after her in criminal court, she probably cannot claim any longer that she has not been informed by the IRS that she owes taxes on her "income" as an "individual" (whatever those terms mean legally).
McCalla received some sort of judicial reprimand for being and acting very conservatively in court.
If Kuglin is smart, she will have liquidated her assets (eg, into diamonds or platinum) and given them to a friend for safekeeping while the IRS attempts to revv up any potential civil court case against her. (And by all means she seems to be smart...)
27 posted on
08/11/2003 3:22:07 PM PDT by
SteveH
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson