Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Fast forward to today. Who supports intervention in Liberia?

Jesse Jackson - "We are turning our backs on Liberia. Liberia remains a killing field on the back burner."
Al Sharpton - "The carnage must stop."
Maxine Waters - "We expect him to do what is necessary, make the decision, do what is necessary to stop this carnage and not sit back and wait, and hope that perhaps [the United States] will never have to go in. But it is stalling at this point."
Kofi Annan - "I believe that we need to pay urgent attention to the situation in Liberia, because Liberia today is poised between hope and disaster"
French Foreign Minister Dominique de Villepin - "France took up its responsibilities in the Ivory Coast, the United Kingdom in Sierra Leone, and the United States has a special tradition in Liberia."
Howard Dean - "I believe that the US must do its share."

Conversely, Who has reservations about intervention?

Michael Ledeen - "I've been in favor of doing something in Liberia for years — but I don't think it should be with American troops"
Mona Charen - Liberia is a mess that will be difficult to fix, and we're full up with other messes -- namely Afghanistan and Iraq -- to clean up just now.
Senators Mitch McConnell, Pat Roberts, and John Warner
Generals Richard B. Myers and Peter Pace, chairman and vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff
Donald Rumsfeld

The left supports intervention in Liberia because the U.S. has no national interest there and they want U.S. forces spread around as thinly as possible. They want our troops to serve as potential targets in UN peacekeeping missions.

Peacekeeping and humanitarian missions are not normally evaluated as military missions, since they are seen as an operation other than war. The fundamental assumption is that everyone can see that the intervening power is neutral and therefore will not attack his armed forces and further, that no one would dare harm those forces. Therefore, the normal calibration of forces required to carry out the mission does not take place. The force is either measured in terms of the humanitarian mission, or is seen as a symbolic presence whose safety is guaranteed by the inherent unwillingness of warring parties to provoke the United States.

In a certain real sense, therefore, peacekeeping forces are there as hostages. The implicit threat is that whichever side violates the peace must pass over the bodies of the peacekeepers. - SOURCE

Jesse, Liberia and Blood Diamonds

What Do We Owe Liberia? - The latest reparations case

Foreign Policy and Self-Interest: Liberia Campaign Would Be a Moral Crime

Eight Reasons Why U.S. Troops Should Not Be Sent to Liberia

1 posted on 08/11/2003 6:48:14 AM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Tailgunner Joe
Great post.
2 posted on 08/11/2003 6:54:30 AM PDT by BOBTHENAILER (One by one, in groups or whole armies.....we don't care how we getcha, but we will)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tailgunner Joe
ping
3 posted on 08/11/2003 7:27:02 AM PDT by genefromjersey (So little time - so many FLAMES to light !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: meenie; cyborg; Alamo-Girl; archy; Barnacle; duckln; dagnabbit; JohnHuang2; livius; Sir Gawain; ...
bump
4 posted on 08/11/2003 8:14:04 AM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tailgunner Joe
Funny. The Belgian paras en route to Stanleyville during the *Operation Dragon Rouge* visit to that city to end the widespread murder and cannibalism and free the hostages there don't look Congolese to me.


7 posted on 08/11/2003 9:23:23 AM PDT by archy (Keep in mind that the milk of human kindness comes from a beast that is both cannibal and a vampire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tailgunner Joe
The deliberate destructon of the right of self-determination in Katanga, was one of the most grievous outrages of the Dean Rusk foreign policy. Although the intiial failure to recognize Katanga must be attributed to the Eisenhower foreign policy, the actual subjugation of the people of Katanga took place under Dean Rusk (Kennedy's Secretary of State), as part of the foreign policy commented on in my essay, An American Foreign Policy, as to the one we should never again follow.

The cruelty of what we supported and basically financed in Katanga--indeed, provided the logistics for--has to be revisted and studied to be fully comprehended. (Incidentally, I am not being mean spirited in attributing the policy to Dean Rusk personally. After extensive correspondence to his Office, which was ignored, my then Congressman, who was one of the most Conservatvie in Washington at the time, got into the act and finally got me a specific answer, as to who was responsible for our Katanga policy. The answer was unequivocal, Dean Rusk.)

William Flax Return Of The Gods Web Site

8 posted on 08/11/2003 1:37:50 PM PDT by Ohioan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tailgunner Joe
This constant chaos in most of the countries in Africa has been going on for years,most of my life.Even the ones that are supposedly doing well are AIDS plagued and often have very high crime rates,South Africa,for example.Don't see too much tourism in Johannesberg these days.

Internal African strife is not our problem and the U.N. shouldn't tell our leaders that it is our problem.I wish we'd just pull out of the U.N. and use the building in Manhattan for the homeless(only kidding).

We are needed for money,that's it, and the Iraq/U.N. fiasco was all the proof that we need.We all now know who are friends are.
9 posted on 08/11/2003 2:52:13 PM PDT by Mears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tailgunner Joe
Bump!

Good Post!
13 posted on 08/11/2003 6:50:13 PM PDT by Dr. Marten (Liberty means responsibility. That is why most men dread it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tailgunner Joe
Few here in the US knew about Katanga because the media neglected to cover this. Now Liberia suddenly becomes major news after years of strife according to the Washington Post. According to them, when Bush intervenes he is wrong and when he doesn't he is also wrong.

What right does the Washington Post or Jesse Jackson have in trying to dictate US foreign policy?
14 posted on 08/12/2003 4:45:10 PM PDT by HISSKGB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tailgunner Joe

bttt


15 posted on 07/27/2012 4:47:47 PM PDT by Coleus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson