Posted on 07/29/2003 1:35:45 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
NEW YORK - As Republicans fix their eyes on the 2004 election, there is a growing sense that their party may be facing a set of opportunities not seen in years.
Not only are they heading into a presidential cycle with a popular incumbent and a sizable fund-raising advantage over any opponent, but the GOP also looks to be in a strong position to expand its majorities in the US Senate and House.
If Republicans are able to pull off across-the-board wins, the outcome could transform the nation's politics. Coming on the heels of the 2002 elections - which gave Republicans outright control of both chambers of Congress and the White House - a wholesale victory in 2004 would solidify the GOP's status as the governing party in Washington, and allow it to leave a clearly defined mark on the policy landscape.
It could even usher in an extended period of Republican dominance, similar to the Democrats' supremacy during Franklin Roosevelt's tenure and beyond. "There will be a lasting effect from this election if [Republicans] hold onto power," says Kayne Robinson, former chairman of the Iowa Republican Party.
Cautious optimism
Certainly, Republicans are taking no chances. They are preparing for a tight presidential contest, raising record sums of money, and devoting more attention than ever to grass-roots and turnout operations.
At the summer meeting this past weekend of the Republican National Committee (RNC), party officials were careful to strike a cautiously optimistic note. While affirming that the 2004 election may afford the party its "greatest opportunity in generations," Ken Mehlman, President Bush's campaign manager, also stressed that it would be "a challenge."
Indeed, recent public opinion polling does have Mr. Bush looking more vulnerable, with his approval ratings below 60 percent. With American casualties mounting in Iraq, Democrats are accusing Bush of misrepresenting intelligence in the run-up to war and bungling the postwar phase.
They are also attacking his management of the economy, highlighting job losses and the return of budget deficits. "I wouldn't want to be running on his economic record," Sen. Jon Corzine (D) of New Jersey said at a recent Monitor breakfast.
And while Bush's popularity among the GOP base has evoked some comparisons to Ronald Reagan, few envision 2004 turning into a landslide along the lines of 1984. Despite all the attention being paid to New York, for example - the city is the site for next year's Republican convention - Thomas Keller, a GOP leader from Westchester County, doubted the president can win his state. "I have to be honest," he said. "It's a long shot.
'He has a touch'
Still, on other key indicators, Bush looks formidable: A majority of Americans regard him as a strong leader, and, unusual for a Republican president, a majority also believe he cares about people like them.
"He has a touch and a connection with people that not everybody has," said Cindy Phillips, a committeewoman from Mississippi attending the RNC meeting.
The party is banking on what Mr. Mehlman called the "transformative power of this president" to forge a broader coalition of support. Already, in 2002, the GOP made inroads into traditionally Democratic groups, winning larger percentages of the Hispanic vote, sharply reducing the gender gap with women, and actually winning seniors outright.
Bush also demonstrated his willingness to campaign tirelessly on behalf of Republican candidates, something likely to continue in 2004. Many believe Bush's popularity will help propel Republicans nationwide into office with him.
"President Bush at the top of any ticket helps any candidate," asserted Kay Kellogg Katz, a GOP state representative from Louisiana, who attended the RNC meeting in a blue, denim shirt studded with rhinestone elephants.
But even if Bush proves not to have political coattails, the 2004 congressional map may well favor the GOP. In the Senate, Demo-crats will be defending 19 seats to Republicans' 15, with 22 of the total 34 seats up in states Bush won in 2000.
In the House, the last round of redistricting largely shored up incumbents, giving Democrats few opportunities to best Republicans. Moreover, a few GOP-held state legislatures, such as Texas, are attempting to redraw district lines again, which could wind up increasing their majorities.
If Bush wins reelection and the GOP increases its majorities in Congress, the party would have four more years to enact its agenda, explained Mr. Robinson of Iowa, and to see its policies play out. If Americans aren't happy with the end results, there could be a backlash, he admitted. But if they are, he said Republicans will "reap the rewards" in subsequent campaigns.
"Our time is just beginning," said Ms. Phillips of Mississippi.
If the republicans can get the economy going again, get all the jobs back, and get american companines to open up factories in america, the republicans will sweep all the elections in 2004.
If the republicans choose to keep unemployment up and continue to encourage american companies to move to asia and hire asian, then they wont.
I dont see any other major issue for 2004 that will swing huge amounts of votes besides the economy and jobs.
What government policies do you specfically propose to accomplish this?
If the republicans choose to keep unemployment up and continue to encourage american companies to move to asia and hire asian, then they wont.
I think you've just outed yourself as a socialist here--you simply presume that government can magically create jobs, and the fact that government ISN'T creating the jobs right now is purely because Republicans don't WANT people to be employed. (You probably believe that Republicans want to throw old people out into the street and take away kids' school lunches, too.)
I dont see any other major issue for 2004 that will swing huge amounts of votes besides the economy and jobs.
Well, there IS this War on Terrorism thingie. I have yet to see a Democrat candidate who sounds sane on the topic. And most people I know who voted for Gore in 2000 are leaning toward Bush in 2004--only the die-hard yellow-dog Democrats have any fire for any candidate, and that candidate is either Howard Dean or Dennis Kucinich. And neither of those two inspire confidence on the national defense issue.
America voted for the Clintons in part because the Cold War ended, and we decided that the Democrats' loopy positions on national defense weren't likely to harm us.
Most voters I've run into understand that 9/11 was the price of having eight years of Democrat control of the executive branch.
You are partly right. War was not an issue in 1992 - the economy was the prime issue. Most americans cared little about Iraq by 1992, but they did care about jobs, so clinton got the swing vote. The same thing is shaping up for 2004. 2004 might be a rerun of 1992.
I really think a big opprotunity exists for Libertarians in the next few years. They are the biggest third party and could position themselves as an opposition party.
Klinton received about 42% of the popular vote if I recall correctly. Are you predicting that the crazy little general will resurface again?
Klinton received about 42% of the popular vote if I recall correctly. Are you predicting that the crazy little general will resurface again?
Clinton received more votes than the republican bush. As far as that goes, the democrat has received more votes than a republican for the past 15 years. A republican has not out voted a democrat since 1988. Although bush did get into the presicency while losing the popular vote, it was a fluke(only happened 3 times in 200 years) dont count on it happening every year. As long as democrats continue to getr more votes than the republican, the democrats will get into office more often than not.
I am not prediciting anything , I just want the republicans to start getting more votes than democrats, and the way to do that is to have a strong economy, lots of good jobs, and lots of manufacturing and new factories going up.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.