Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Prison Population Grows "Despite Drop in Crime Rate" (Classic Liberal stupidity by AP)
AP ^ | July 27, 2003 | CURT ANDERSON

Posted on 07/27/2003 8:07:38 PM PDT by nwrep

States Face Growing Prison Population Despite Drop in Crime Rate

Sun Jul 27, 6:27 PM ET
Add U.S. National - AP to My Yahoo!

By CURT ANDERSON, Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON - America's prison population grew again in 2002 despite a declining crime rate, costing the federal government and states an estimated $40 billion a year at a time of rampant budget shortfalls.

The inmate population in 2002 of more than 2.1 million represented a 2.6 percent increase over 2001, according to a report released Sunday by the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Preliminary FBI (news - web sites) statistics showed a 0.2 percent drop in overall crime during the same span.

Experts say mandatory sentences, especially for nonviolent drug offenders, are a major reason inmate populations have risen for 30 years. About one of every 143 U.S. residents was in the federal, state or local custody at year's end.

"The nation needs to break the chains of our addiction to prison, and find less costly and more effective policies like treatment," said Will Harrell, executive director of the Texas American Civil Liberties Union (news - web sites). "We need to break the cycle."

Others say tough sentencing laws, such as the "three strikes" laws that can put repeat offenders behind bars for life, are a chief reason for the drop in crime. The Justice Department (news - web sites), for example, this year ordered Bureau of Prisons officials to stop sending so many white-collar and nonviolent criminals to halfway houses.

"The prospect of prison, more than any other sanction, is feared by white-collar criminals and has a powerful deterrent effect," Deputy Attorney General Larry Thompson said in a memo announcing the change.

Yet the cost of housing, feeding and caring for a prison inmate is roughly $20,000 per year, or about $40 billion nationwide using 2002 figures, according to The Sentencing Project, a nonprofit organization that promotes alternatives to prison. Construction costs are about $100,000 per cell.

Even as these costs keeping climbing, the federal government is tackling a giant budget deficit and 31 states this year are cutting spending — most often across all programs — to deal with shortfalls, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.

"The prison population and budget figures, taken together, should be setting off alarm bells in state capitols," said Jason Zeidenberg, director of policy and research for the Justice Policy Institute, a nonprofit organization focused on ending reliance on incarceration.

Drug offenders now make up more than half of all federal prisoners. The federal penal system, which has tough sentencing policies for drug offenses, is now the nation's largest at more than 151,600 — an increase of 4.2 percent compared with 2001.

Over the same period, state prison and jail populations grew just 2.4 percent. Prison alternative advocates credit moves in some states to divert drug offenders to treatment programs and other innovations for that lower growth rate.

Texas, for example, recently passed a drug treatment alternative law and saw its prison population remain virtually unchanged from 2001 to 2002. Ohio, which revised its sentencing and parole guidelines in the late 1990s, had its prison and jail population rise just 0.8 percent last year compared with 1.9 percent for the Midwest as a whole.

"The way to reduce prison spending is to reduce the number of people in prison and the number of prisons, like some states across the country have done," said Rose Braz, director of Critical Resistance, a California-based group opposed to prison expansion.

At the same time, the Justice Department report found that 17 states reported increases of at least 5 percent year-to-year in their prison populations, with Maine's increasing by 11.5 percent and Rhode Island's rising 8.6 percent. The federal prisons and almost all state corrections systems are over their capacities, with 71,000 offenders serving their state or federal sentences in local jails.

Other key points in the report:

_As of last Dec. 31, there were 97,491 women in state or federal prisons, or about 6.8 percent of all inmates and one in every 1,656 women. There were over 1.3 million male inmates, or about one in 110 men.

_About 10 percent of all black men between 25 and 29 were incarcerated last year, compared with 1.2 percent of white men and 2.4 percent of Hispanic men. Overall, the 586,700 black men in prison outnumbered both the 436,800 white males and 235,000 Hispanic males. Black males account for about 45 percent of all inmates serving a sentence longer than a year.

_Privately operated prisons held 93,771 inmates, about 5.8 percent of state prisoners and 12.4 percent of those in federal jurisdictions.

_At year's end 2002, the federal government held 8,748 people at immigration detention facilities, 2,377 at military jails and 16,206 in U.S. territorial prisons.

___

On the Net:

Bureau of Justice Statistics: http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: bias; criminals; dissonance; liberal
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

1 posted on 07/27/2003 8:07:39 PM PDT by nwrep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nwrep
Could it possibly be that the drop in crime rate is because of the number of people in prison?

I liberal could never think that way.
2 posted on 07/27/2003 8:09:20 PM PDT by arjay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nwrep
Shouldn't the title read:

Crime drop plummets because criminals are in jail.
3 posted on 07/27/2003 8:09:56 PM PDT by So Cal Rocket (Free Miguel and Priscilla!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nwrep
"Despite" is a word indicating that the author has reasoned his own way to a headline. Unfortunately, he's reasoned the wrong way.
4 posted on 07/27/2003 8:10:45 PM PDT by July 4th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: So Cal Rocket
Not if you are a liberal and cannot see the connection. Read "BIAS".
5 posted on 07/27/2003 8:10:48 PM PDT by nwrep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: July 4th
Its called editorializing.
6 posted on 07/27/2003 8:11:39 PM PDT by nwrep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: nwrep
Maybe the crime rate is down because a larger number of the bad guys are in the tank. If the cost per prisoner is too high, I have several great budget cutting ideas...2 meals per day, no free computer/internet access, and require inmates to work to earn money and help pay towards their room and board. Any fruits of their crimes (money from drug dealing, etc.) be seized and put towards their imprisonment costs.
7 posted on 07/27/2003 8:13:27 PM PDT by giznort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nwrep
Thinking man's headline:

Drop in Crime Rate as Prison Population Grows


8 posted on 07/27/2003 8:13:40 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative (Do not remove this tag under penalty of law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nwrep
Curt Anderson is a Jason Blair wannabee.
9 posted on 07/27/2003 8:15:03 PM PDT by Mudbug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nwrep
You mean, Clinton's been incarcerated? ;)
10 posted on 07/27/2003 8:16:24 PM PDT by Libertina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nwrep
Here's how a rat thinks: "Wow, man . . . The murder rate has fallen a fraction of a percent, man . . . So how come we're still locking up murderers, man? . . . New murderers should be given a pass, man . . . They shouldn't be locked up, too, man . . . Locking up all the old murderers is good enough, man . . . It's racist, too, man . . . Pass me that doobie, man . . ."
11 posted on 07/27/2003 8:18:24 PM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
Or:

Prison Population Rises Because of Under-used Death Penalty.
12 posted on 07/27/2003 8:20:16 PM PDT by Thane_Banquo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: nwrep
Nice pic, BTW.
13 posted on 07/27/2003 8:21:29 PM PDT by Mudbug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nwrep
Man, now that is a weird, funky picture. Is that supposed to be an orchastra serenading an imprisoned Clinton? Hahah!
14 posted on 07/27/2003 8:23:57 PM PDT by HitmanLV (I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
Here's how a rat thinks: "Wow, man . . . The murder rate has fallen a fraction of a percent, man . . . So how come we're still locking up murderers, man? . . . New murderers should be given a pass, man . . . They shouldn't be locked up, too, man . . . Locking up all the old murderers is good enough, man . . . It's racist, too, man . . . Pass me that doobie, man . . ."

"Hey it's me, Dave. Let me in."

"Dave's not here, man."

"No, I'm Dave."

"Huh? Sorry man, Dave's not here."

"No man, it's me, Dave. I'm right here. Let me in."

"Sorry, man, Dave's out right now. Maybe you should come back later, man."

15 posted on 07/27/2003 8:24:09 PM PDT by Thane_Banquo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Thane_Banquo
A common drug abuser who doesn't work, needs tens of thousands of $$$ per year to support him and his habit. Where does he get this money? You can bet he ends up costing society much more than the $20K per year to incarcerate him.
16 posted on 07/27/2003 8:26:51 PM PDT by umgud (gov't has more money than it needs, but never as much as it wants)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Mudbug
I take that back...Curt Anderson is a Jason Blair has-been.
17 posted on 07/27/2003 8:27:54 PM PDT by Mudbug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: nwrep
"The way to reduce prison spending is to reduce the number of people in prison..."

What pisses me off, this guy probably gets a paycheck for saying stuff like that. Ultimately, crime doesn't bother them, just the number of criminals locked up, apparently.
18 posted on 07/27/2003 8:30:37 PM PDT by Freedom4US
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nwrep
Wow. The writer sure did go to some length to get a DIVERSITY of opinions on this topic:

* "...said Will Harrell, executive director of the Texas American Civil Liberties Union"
* "...according to The Sentencing Project, a nonprofit organization that promotes alternatives to prison."
* "...said Jason Zeidenberg, director of policy and research for the Justice Policy Institute, a nonprofit organization focused on ending reliance on incarceration."
* "Prison alternative advocates..."
* "...said Rose Braz, director of Critical Resistance, a California-based group opposed to prison expansion."


Can you say...





It's Not Just A Gun...

It's My "HOMELAND DEFENSE RIFLE"!!
19 posted on 07/27/2003 8:45:23 PM PDT by The_Macallan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libertina
And who's that cellmate? Looks like Mandella, but it's hard to say...too much music in the background. I wonder what they're playing.
20 posted on 07/27/2003 9:00:36 PM PDT by Mudbug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson