Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cincinatus' Wife
We reduced the fats, like butter and meats, and increased the intake of refined wheat and sugars.

And we gained weight...

And diabetes grew dramatically in the population...

It couldn’t possibly be that Atkins was right and everyone else was wrong…

Personally, I think he’s right.
3 posted on 07/25/2003 2:48:22 AM PDT by DB (©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: DB
Me too. The sugar, grain, citrus, etc industries have done a good sales job.
5 posted on 07/25/2003 3:10:07 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: DB; afraidfortherepublic
I agree with you. Atkins knew what he was talking about.

These complicated little bodies have alot more than just food and exercise affecting the weight. Atkins had shown me certain medicines, yeast, and lack of nutrition affects my weight loss. I have worked out till blue in the face and haven't lost weight the way I am now doing Atkins and making changes to the factors above.

I can't look at obese people without feeling empathy for them - they've been sold the lie as I had been on what to do to lose weight, only to have their health and weight loss goals sabotage by sugar, flour, trans fats, etc., etc.

14 posted on 07/25/2003 3:55:55 AM PDT by Ladysmith (Land of the Free Because of the BRAVE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: DB
It couldn’t possibly be that Atkins was right and everyone else was wrong…

Personally, I think he’s right.

Personally, I think he's dead. :-\

In any event, what good can comes from Atkins and Sears is that people should cast the suspicious eye on carbos that had previously been cast on fats. For myself personally, it's a matter of exercise. If I exercise, I keep the 32-inch waist. If I don't, then I gotta try to find the box with the 36's.

What's actually happening is a return to the commonly accepted 'folk knowledge' of hundreds of years, before pointy-headed university nutritionists foisted their inane 'food pyramid' upon the American populace as yet another liberal Great Society social experiment.

29 posted on 07/25/2003 5:05:22 AM PDT by Dr.Deth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: DB
I always liked the Scarsdale diet. Following it was sort of a discipline. Only for a couple of weeks at a time, but it
did tend to break bad habits.

Not that the bad habits didn't come creeping back.

39 posted on 07/25/2003 5:19:57 AM PDT by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: DB
We reduced the fats, like butter and meats, and increased the intake of refined wheat and sugars.

You nailed it. The rise in obesity corresponds with the low-fat craze and the indoctrination of the food pyramid (with its 5 servings of wheat and grains per day). Low fat in processed foods usually means high sugar.

49 posted on 07/25/2003 5:39:11 AM PDT by randita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: DB
ATkins is most definitely right...but he also gives me the worst gout I've ever suffered!
54 posted on 07/25/2003 6:09:18 AM PDT by meandog ("Do unto others before they do unto you!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: DB
it IS a simple equation. If you burn more calories than you take in, you lose/maintain your weight. If you take in more calories than you burn off, you put on weight. Very simple. Eat less, exercise more, until you get the first scenario, then keep it up. Very simple.
75 posted on 07/25/2003 7:43:06 AM PDT by Capt.YankeeMike (get outta my pocket, outta my car, and outta the schools)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson