Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nevada lawmakers approve record $836 million tax plan, avert 'constitutional crisis'
Sac Bee ^ | 7/22/03 | AP - Carson City

Posted on 07/22/2003 9:42:07 AM PDT by NormsRevenge

Edited on 04/12/2004 5:53:00 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: TheAngryClam
I'm disputing your characterization of gambling as a replacement for useful work. When you consider it a replacement for various other forms of recreation and entertainment, it's actually one of the most economically productive (in terms of employment and consumption) of any such recreational activity.

Nonsense.

Consider professional sports. That has pushed new developments in technology in materials, medical treatment, general preventative medical care, home electronics, and exercise equipment development, high bandwidth communications, ALL of which have application outside the primary transaction of going to see a game (to which gambling advocates compare it). Team sports encourage competitiveness and character development in kids. They helps build stronger longer lives. The negative externalities compared to gambling are miniscule.

21 posted on 07/22/2003 4:28:10 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (California! See how low WE can go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Kenny Guinn and every other scumbag who voted for this rape of the taxpayers need to be voted out of office. We shall see if Nevada is lost forever.
22 posted on 07/22/2003 6:14:26 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheAngryClam; Carry_Okie
Any trade increases wealth for both participants- in this case, trading your money to the casino in return for the excitement/opportunity of playing the game.

Poppycock. Carry_Okie is right.
Trade doesn't increase wealth whatsoever, it merely transfers wealth.

WEALTH: The net ownership of material possessions and productive resources. In other words, the difference between physical and financial assets that you own and the liabilities that you owe. Wealth includes all of the tangible consumer stuff that you possess, like cars, houses, clothes, jewelry, etc.; any financial assets, like stocks, bonds, bank accounts, that you lay claim to; and your ownership of resources, including labor, capital, and natural resources. Of course, you must deduct any debts you owe.

VALUE ADDED: The increase in the value of a good at each stage of the production process. The value that's being increased is specifically the ability of a good to satisfy wants and needs either directly as a consumption good or indirectly as a capital good. A good that provides greater satisfaction has greater value. In essence, the whole purpose of production is to transform raw materials and natural resources that have relatively little value into goods and services that have greater value.

SERVICE: An activity that provides direct satisfaction of wants and needs without the production of a tangible product or good. Examples include information, entertainment, and education. This term good should be contrasted with the term good, which involves the satisfaction of wants and needs with tangible items. You're likely to see the plural combination of these two into a single phrase, "goods and services," to indicate the wide assortment of economic production from the economy's scarce resources.

Wealth is created only by engaging in value-added activities. By the same token, Service sector activities do not create wealth, they merely transfer, redistribute and eventually dissipate wealth as consumption. Thus, as value-added activities move offshore and the U.S. labor force shifts to the Service Sector, wealth is dissipated, not created. And the U.S. standard of living declines as a result.
23 posted on 07/22/2003 6:20:59 PM PDT by Willie Green (Go Pat Go!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
As usual the Sac Bee is full of Crap. The Dems went down in flames, they wanted 1.3 Billion increase,and the Repubs held them to a little over 800,000.00. The spin doctors are working overtime on this....
24 posted on 07/22/2003 6:32:31 PM PDT by BooBoo1000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: BooBoo1000
The Dems went down in flames, they wanted 1.3 Billion increase,and the Repubs held them to a little over 800,000.00. The spin doctors are working overtime on this....

Fortunately, there are those of us who remember the doubletalk about "decreasing the rate of increase" producing a "savings".
The blasted RINOs didn't "hold" the 'Rats to anything.
Rather than actually CUT government waste, they crammed a tax increase up our butts.

25 posted on 07/22/2003 6:42:19 PM PDT by Willie Green (Go Pat Go!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
"...outmaneuver Republicans..."

Good old AP bias; had it been the other way around the line would have read "Republicans rammed through..."

26 posted on 07/22/2003 7:27:17 PM PDT by evilC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheAngryClam
Myth - as in the party ends sometime. Now the state is in the red and will now pick the pockets of the taxpayers.
27 posted on 07/23/2003 12:22:34 AM PDT by TheBattman (I was going to write a book titled "100 Uses for a DemocRAT" but I couldn't think of any.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Republicans sold out Nevada voters. One should inform the turncoats not to expect support in next year's primary. The RINO Kenny Guinn and the SCON Seven got their unconstitutional edict rammed down Nevadans throats. It has a sour taste.
28 posted on 07/23/2003 12:25:14 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZGuy
Its a RINO controlled Senate. 15 of the 17 "Republicans" are RINOs.
29 posted on 07/23/2003 12:26:26 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard
I think Nevada is going to go the way of California. The Democrats and RINOs next move will be to force an income tax upon the state. Nothing stands in the way of their liberal big government agenda now.
30 posted on 07/23/2003 12:28:12 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson