Posted on 07/16/2003 6:28:59 AM PDT by bedolido
Thats the main question at the center of the Dean-Kerry showdown
It's the independence day parade in Amherst, N.H., and John Forbes Kerry, the elegant Senator from Massachusetts, is wearing a button-down, long-sleeve tattersall shirt, khaki pants and topsiders. He is surrounded by about 100 supporters, many of them young people toting signs. There is a Kerry truck blaring music. "It doesn't get much better than this," he says, a statement meant to convey enthusiasm but which comes off as Kerry's awkward guess at what a politician ought to be saying in such circumstances.
Other candidatesJoe Lieberman, Bob Grahamare in the parade, but you would hardly know it. This event is mano a mano: Kerry vs. Dr. Howard Dean, the former Governor of Vermont. Dean has about the same number of supporters as Kerrybut they're younger, more enthusiastic and much more creative. Some are wearing white doctors' coats, brandishing stethoscopes and passing out tongue depressors with the words "Rx for America: Howard Dean." The Governor, however, seems unprepared for parading. He's wearing navy pinstripe suit pants, a blue business shirt and his perennial black penny loafers. When we shake hands, he blurts the first thing that comes to mind: "It's good we're not right behind the horses. That always happens in Vermontit's a message, I guess. You have to watch your step, which is a pain because you want eye contact with the people." When the parade begins, Dean takes offrunning, and I mean sprintingfrom clump to clump of parade watchers. His face grows red; he sweats; people hand him Dixie cups of water as if he were in a marathon. John Kerry, by contrast, occasionally breaks into a stately jog, from one side of the street to the other.
Beware of parade metaphors. And yet ... Kerry jogging artfully, Dean running artlesslythat's pretty much where the race stands in New Hampshire these days. There are other candidates and other states. Congressman Dick Gephardt has support in Iowa and could easily win the nomination, especially if Kerry and Dean murder each other over the same subset of white, well-educated voters. And so Kerry vs. Dean has become the preliminary bout before the Democrats' main event. It is a struggle that revolves around a single issue that mixes style and substance. The issue is Iraq. The style question is, How angry should Democrats be about what George W. Bush has done there?
Dean is winning on both counts. His opposition to the war is looking less radical every day. His stylehis imprudence, his plain talkjust doesn't sound like the other guys. At the Dems' winter meeting in Washington, he arrived at the podium and, instead of lapsing into the usual thank-you blather, blasted off like a rocket-propelled grenade: "What I want to know is why so many Democrats in Washington aren't standing up against Bush's unilateral war in Iraq." This was followed by several more withering "What I want to knows" and then the introduction: "My name is Howard Dean, and I represent the Democratic wing of the Democratic Party." The crowd went nuts.
(Excerpt) Read more at time.com ...
50,000 people go to a baseball game, but the game was rained out. A refund is then due. The team is about to mail refunds when the Congressional Democrats stopps them and decrees that they send out refund amounts based on the Democrat National Committee's interpretation of fairness. After all,if the refunds are made based on the price each person paid for the tickets, most of the money would go to the wealthiest ticket holders. That would be unconscionable! |
Free Republic |
---|
Your donations keep us fighting liberals |
Blue pencil went to were.
Joe Klein and all his buddies at Time (and CNN, and the NYT, and CBS/ABC/NBC/MSNBC/etc.etc.etc. can only hope... Their sympathies are so transparent...
Were or was?
I don't understand either comment.
DOH!
Take a blue pencil and alter the phrase "The crowd went nuts" and cross out the word "went" and insert "were." It would read "The crowd were nuts." The other posted suggested it should read "The crowd was nuts."
THIS IS TOTALLY FALSE: The SOTU did not say that Iraq had acquired uranium, but that it had sought to. Don't these guys know the difference?
Yes--the ones that whine and plead for handouts.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.