Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Court sinks Clintons on W'water tab
New York Daily News ^ | 7/16/03 | KENNETH R. BAZINET

Posted on 07/16/2003 2:01:59 AM PDT by kattracks

WASHINGTON - The feds will reimburse Bill and Hillary Clinton only $85,000 of the $3.5million they sought to cover legal bills from the Whitewater investigation, a court ruled yesterday.

The U.S. Court of Appeals rejected the Clintons' argument that they were wrongful targets of a partisan witch hunt and ruled the inquiry led by former independent counsel Kenneth Starr had merit.

But the lawyer for the Clintons said they were shortchanged, getting less than 3% of what they requested.

David Kendall, the lawyer, said that in the aftermath of the federal government's Iran-Contra investigation, which probed the sale of arms to Iran to finance Nicaraguan rebels, former President Ronald Reagan was reimbursed for72% of his costs, and ex-Vice President George Bush got back 59% of his expenses.

"The facts and the numbers speak for themselves. The good news is that the partisan Whitewater smoke-and-mirrors investigation is finally over," Kendall said.

The ruling won't leave the Clintons in the poorhouse: Though they still have legal bills estimated at $1.7 million to $6.5 million, they've made at least $37 million in speeches, book deals, investments and salaries since they left the White House.

A former longtime Clinton aide said the ruling signals that 35 others - including former White House intern Monica Lewinsky - who have asked for a total of $4 million in reimbursements could be disappointed, too.

The seven-year, $70 million Whitewater investigation began by looking into a failed Arkansas land deal but eventually led to Bill Clinton's impeachment by the House of Representatives forlying about his tryst with Lewinsky.

Originally published on July 16, 2003



TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 07/16/2003 2:02:00 AM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kattracks
The ruling won't leave the Clintons in the poorhouse: Though they still have legal bills estimated at $1.7 million to $6.5 million, they've made at least $37 million in speeches, book deals, investments and salaries since they left the White House.

Why don't they just pay their legal bills and shut up? Answer: Then they'd have one less avenue for publicity.

2 posted on 07/16/2003 3:05:49 AM PDT by jimtorr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

PRETTY IN PINK


Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD-
It is in the breaking news sidebar!


3 posted on 07/16/2003 3:06:19 AM PDT by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Thanks for this Information, My Day is going to be a Happy one, besides this good news I have a good tip on a Horse Racing today,, and yes Republicans do Gamble Legally, lol
4 posted on 07/16/2003 3:16:48 AM PDT by Eldorado431
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
The feds will reimburse Bill and Hillary Clinton only $85,000

That's $85k too much. And it's not 'the feds' who pay, it's you and I.

5 posted on 07/16/2003 3:30:35 AM PDT by RJCogburn ("All them Parmelees is teched. Harold's the worst.".....Lucky Ned Pepper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
The U.S. Court of Appeals rejected the Clintons' argument that they were wrongful targets of a partisan witch hunt and ruled the inquiry led by former independent counsel Kenneth Starr had merit.

Well, the Clintons' spin hasn't been too successful in court.  Poor dears.  Too bad the court costs can't be increased for these two.

6 posted on 07/16/2003 3:34:37 AM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Shouldn't they be required to pay interest?
7 posted on 07/16/2003 4:59:01 AM PDT by TommyDale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Ah, Whitewater. You know, we should have a separate forum for such articles. We could call it...oh, I don't know..."The Whitewater File" or "Topic: Whitewater", or something like that.
8 posted on 07/16/2003 5:24:45 AM PDT by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
How sweet it is. They think they can always get away with it, don't they?
9 posted on 07/16/2003 7:17:02 AM PDT by Marysecretary (GOD is still in control!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Does the phrase "WE WILL APPEAL" ring a bell with anyone? They will until they get to one of their own judges. I'd bet on it.
10 posted on 07/16/2003 8:25:36 AM PDT by Don Corleone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson