Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

9-11, Oklahoma City—You Name It - It Happened in Baghdad
Village Voice ^ | July 15th, 2003 12:00 PM | James Ridgeway

Posted on 07/15/2003 12:47:28 PM PDT by dead

So maybe the Iraqis didn't buy uranium in Niger. But we can still blame them for everything else—from 9-11 and the Oklahoma City bombing to Eric Rudolph's alleged attacks on abortion clinics. Consider the testimony of the American Enterprise Institute's Laurie Mylroie, who was considered credible enough to be an expert witness before the 9-11 Commission last week.

The commission, which has been complaining that Bush won't turn over vital documents, is looking into the circumstances behind the World Trade Center attack. "To defeat and destroy our enemy, we must understand more than the crimes it already committed," the commission chairman, former New Jersey governor Thomas Kean, said last week. "We must understand what drives and motivates it, the source of its power, the resources at its command, its internal strengths and weaknesses."

At last Wednesday's public hearing, Mylroie, who at one time was a consultant to the Department of Defense, said she thinks the World Trade Center bombing in 1993, a botched plot hatched in the Philippines to blow up a dozen American airliners, and 9-11 all were the work of Iraqi intelligence. Under this theory, the Iraqis faked intelligence files in Kuwait to create false identities for their key agents, including master terrorist Ramzi Yousef, who then were dispatched to the U.S. As for Al Qaeda, Mylroie contended that Saddam and bin Laden were in it together but that the Iraqi intelligence apparatus was the key. Bin Laden on his own never could have put together the attacks within the U.S., said Mylroie. Only operatives from an actual nation would have the knowledge and resources to do so. Her evidence is tenuous and circumstantial, but she claimed authenticity on grounds it was embraced by Israeli spooks and the former head of the New York FBI office.

Mylroie also wondered whether the anthrax attacks were the work of Iraqi intelligence, and she has speculated that the Oklahoma City blast was suspicious because it occurred after Terry Nichols, convicted bomber Timothy McVeigh's cohort, visited Mindanao, a hotbed of Muslim extremism in the Philippines, and supposedly attended a meeting with Ramzi Yousef and other terrorists.

"The connection of Terry Nichols, the Philippines, and Ramzi Yousef is a very important point that neither the FBI nor the press pursued," Mylroie has told Insight on the News magazine. "I doubt that Nichols has ever been asked about his connections to Yousef because the government didn't want to know. It wanted to say, 'Here are the perpetrators. We arrested them and we brought them to justice. Case closed.' " (Federal investigations and court testimony suggested that Nichols went to the Philippines to visit his mail-order bride. There's no evidence he met with terrorists. McVeigh's attorney, Stephen Jones, checked out the foreign-terrorist angle but couldn't get his findings admitted at trial. Mylroie served as consultant to Jones.)

Others have taken Mylroie's ideas further, arguing that the abortion bomber Eric Rudolph might have Iraqi ties. How did he stay alive and well for five years? Maybe Iraqi intelligence was at work in the North Carolina mountains. And, as one might imagine, all of this ends up with Bill Clinton's manipulations—both his failure to take action and his desire to look like a really smart guy after the Oklahoma City bombing by blaming McVeigh and Nichols for what was really an Iraqi plot.

Mylroie's work on Iraq and its connections to the two World Trade Center attacks have been endorsed by Rumsfeldians Richard Perle, Paul Wolfowitz, and former CIA director James Woolsey. While the theories may appear to be far-fetched, they are to be taken seriously because those neocon hawks perched in Rumsfeld's Defense Department reportedly have replaced the CIA as the major center for American intelligence. If the commission seriously entertains Mylroie's ideas, its investigations could take an alarming turn of direction—away from Al Qaeda to Saddam Hussein and Iraq—and in this way go down the drain for good.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Additional reporting: Phoebe St John and Joanna Khenkine


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Others have taken Mylroie's ideas further, arguing that the abortion bomber Eric Rudolph might have Iraqi ties. Maybe Iraqi intelligence was at work in the North Carolina mountains.

“Others” whom Ridgeway curiously declines to identify. He read that somewhere. He wrote it down, and then he read it.

Mylroie's work on Iraq and its connections to the two World Trade Center attacks have been endorsed by Rumsfeldians Richard Perle, Paul Wolfowitz, and former CIA director James Woolsey.

Cleverly written to make it appear that these people, and Mylroie, also buy into the Eric Rudolph connection, which is infinitely more kooky than the thoroughly plausible idea that Iraq was involved in the planning, at least tangentially, of both WTC attacks.

Ridgeway’s bucking for Jason Blair’s old job.

1 posted on 07/15/2003 12:47:29 PM PDT by dead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All
.
REMEMBER

CAN PREVENT

FUNDRAISERS

.

PLEASE SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC
Donate Here By Secure Server
Or mail checks to FreeRepublic , LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD-
It is in the breaking news sidebar!


2 posted on 07/15/2003 12:50:03 PM PDT by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead
Don't forget Flight 800. If you are going to get the story wrong, at least get the whole story.
3 posted on 07/15/2003 12:50:54 PM PDT by Only1choice____Freedom (Once a soldier, always a soldier. They enemies of freedom never rest.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead
Truth will out.
4 posted on 07/15/2003 12:53:33 PM PDT by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Only1choice____Freedom
1993, World Trade Center garage bombing, NYC

Event
Bomb's Power
Deaths
Injuries
Feb. 26, 1993, rented van packed with explosives
1 ton TNT
6
>1,000




1995, Oklahoma City bombing, Murrah Federal Building
Event
Bomb's Power
Deaths
Injuries
April 19, 1995, rented truck full of explosives
2* tons TNT168>400



1995, attack on U.S. military advisors in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Event
Bomb's Power
Deaths
Injuries
Nov. 13, 1995, truck bomb
* ton TNT742



1996, Khobar Towers bombing, Saudi Arabia
Event
Bomb's Power
Deaths
Injuries
June 25, 1996, fuel truck bomb
10-15 tons TNT19>500



1998, bombing of U.S. Embassy in Nairobi, Kenya
Event
Bomb's Power
Deaths
Injuries
August 7, 1998, truck bomb
1 ton TNT291> 5,000




1998, bombing of U.S. Embassy in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania

Event
Bomb's Power
Deaths
Injuries
August 7, 1998, truck bomb
1 ton TNT1077



2000, bombing of U.S.S. Cole, Aden, Yemen
Event
Bomb's Power
Deaths
Injuries
October 12, 2000, small water craft bomb
1 ton TNT1739



2001, attack on World Trade Center using two airliners, NYC

Event
Bomb's Power
Deaths
Injuries
Sept. 11, 2001, two fully fueled airliners
900 tons TNT5,350 (?)>6,500



2001, attack on Pentagon using an airliner, Arlington, VA
Event
Bomb's Power
Deaths
Injuries
Sept. 11, 2001, one fully fueled airliner
400 tons TNT18976



2001, hijacking and crash of Flight 93, near Pittsburgh, PA

Event
Bomb's Power
Deaths
Injuries
Sept. 11, 2001, crash of hijacked airliner in Penna.
400 tons TNT440

Marine Barracks in Lebanon





5 posted on 07/15/2003 2:12:09 PM PDT by joesnuffy (Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dead
He read that somewhere. He wrote it down, and then he read it.

Sounds a bit like the style of our Iraqi Nuke Intel, a slip shod style of which Mylorie herself seems to be a big fan.

BTW, I agree that the Eric Rudolph connection bit is ridiculous. It ruined an otherwise fairly good article of which I agree on many points....especially...

"...those neocon hawks perched in Rumsfeld's Defense Department reportedly have replaced the CIA as the major center for American intelligence".
6 posted on 07/16/2003 6:30:07 AM PDT by mr.pink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mr.pink
Sounds a bit like the style of our Iraqi Nuke Intel, a slip shod style of which Mylorie herself seems to be a big fan.

I can’t speak about Mylorie, since I am not very familiar with her work, but your other assertion is absurd.

There is no evidence that the our intelligence manufactured evidence. They may have misinterpreted some, but that remains to be seen.

The British Intelligence services cited a forged document about the Nigerian connection, but they stand by their conclusions based on other evidence.

In addition, Bush’s actual statement ("The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa.") is demonstrably true, since that was what the British government claimed, and still does.

The fact that Iraq had a nuclear program is also undeniable based on the facts on the table:

The following from: Fact Sheet: Iraq’s Nuclear Weapon Programme – International Atomic Energy Agency, 25 April 2002

1. Imported 4,006 kg of natural uranium and 6,005 kg of depleted uranium (DU) from Italy in 1979

2. Imported 1,767 kg low enriched uranium (LEU) from Italy in 1982

3. Imported almost 50 kg of highly enriched uranium (HEU) from Russia and France

4. Procured 429 drums containing 138,098 kg yellowcake from Portugal in 1980

5. Procured 487 drums containing 148,348 kg yellowcake from Portugal in 1982

6. Procured 432 drums containing 137,435 kg of yellowcake from Niger in 1981

7. Procured 426 drums containing 139,409 kg of yellowcake from Niger in 1982

8. Imported 24,260 kg of uranium dioxide from Brazil between 1981-82

What is your exact problem with the intelligence gathered so far?

7 posted on 07/16/2003 7:12:36 AM PDT by dead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: dead
There is no evidence that the our intelligence manufactured evidence. They may have misinterpreted some, but that remains to be seen.

Your "may have misrepresented some" is a very sore point for me as it seems to be hurting the President. How the Intel is being presented to the President is a concern for me. The consequences of "misrepresented" Intel with be on Bush's shoulders and it will provide electoral ammo to his enemies if the misrepresentors don't stand up and take the bullet.

I saw Santorum on Hardball last night, and even he had misgivings about the operational workings of the chain that is processing and presentating our Intel to the Pres.

On a less serious note, did you watch the game last night?...a real classic IMO.
8 posted on 07/16/2003 7:49:35 AM PDT by mr.pink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: mr.pink
Your "may have misrepresented some" is a very sore point for me as it seems to be hurting the President.

I did not say “misrepresented.” I said “misinterpreted.” There is a world of difference.

Misrepresentation is lying. Misinterpreting is drawing the wrong conclusion from the available evidence.

As I said, it remains to be seen whether or not that even happened. Do you have proof that Iraq never tried to acquire plutonium? If you do, your evidence directly contradicts the International Atomic Energy Agency’s report. It also flies in the face of the positions held by Koffi Annan, Chiraq, Schroeder, Daschle,Blair, Bush, Clinton, the other Bush, the other Clinton, and just about everybody else who’s looked at the evidence.

The fact of the matter is that Iraq absolutely did have a nuke program. That is proven, even admitted to by Iraq. The question is only how active it was in the months prior to our invasion.

A very minor point in the grand scheme of things, unless you think Saddam was burying the hardware for his nuclear program with the intention of leaving it in the ground.

And that game last night was a classic, though the final outcome was not good.

9 posted on 07/16/2003 8:15:24 AM PDT by dead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: dead
I did not say “misrepresented.” I said “misinterpreted.” There is a world of difference.

Apologies for that....I usually make that sort of mistake pre-second cup of coffee.

However, I think the whether intel was "misinterpreted" or "misrepresented" remains to be seen. I think the distinction between the two is especially relative to how the immenence (sp?) of the Iraqi threat to us was presented by the Pres.

I have no doubts Iraq was pursuing nukes. Most nations with leaders of that mentality, and $$$$, will pursue them.

Again, I like the Pres, but I am becoming increasingly skeptical of the degree of loyalty of some of his trusted underlings.

On the game....I can appreciate your not enjoying the outcome. I usually don't root AL or NL in the AS Game, as I'm more interested in who steps his game up on the big stage. My girlfriend pushed to have a bet on it, she's Japanese so I was surprised she wanted the NL....I won a Yankee coffee cup.
10 posted on 07/16/2003 8:54:57 AM PDT by mr.pink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson