Good article. There's a lot more at the site if you follow the link.
1 posted on
07/10/2003 7:58:42 AM PDT by
alnitak
To: All
Strong Conservative Forums Help Prevent Candidates Like This From Winning Elections
|
|
Finish Strong. Donate Here By Secure Server
Or mail checks to FreeRepublic , LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
|
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD- It is in the breaking news sidebar!
|
2 posted on
07/10/2003 8:00:48 AM PDT by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: alnitak
The article is not bad, but had one glaring omission. The US is the only country with a fledgling private space program, and I'd say they are much more likely to come up with an innovative way to make space travel practical than any government bureaucracy.
So why not invest the bucks into prizes for them to compete for? Offer up about $10 billion with a reasonable goal (say one that would cost NASA $30 billion) and see what happens.
To: alnitak
Bump to read later.
To: alnitak
Considering the way NASA has been spending OUR money, we could do without them.
6 posted on
07/10/2003 8:58:31 AM PDT by
PatrioticAmerican
(When the government controls all information, they control you.)
To: alnitak
Self-ping.
7 posted on
07/10/2003 9:07:41 AM PDT by
Physicist
To: alnitak
I think the author may be missing something - there's proposals out there for Shuttle-Derived heavy-lift vehicles. Robert Zubrin covered a few different options in the book "The Case For Mars."
Getting the big stuff up there doesn't require a manned mission. Send the crew up on the dinky ship, and the heavy stuff up on an unmanned SDHLV.
9 posted on
07/10/2003 10:47:22 AM PDT by
mvpel
(Michael Pelletier)
To: alnitak
NASA is an organization in the final stages of senility. They long ago bought into a vision of the future where they would be funded on the same level as the defense department or some entitlement. They are still waiting for the fulfillment of that vision, and probably always will wait in vain.
Developing cheap access to space would let the air out of that vision. They will never do it, and are doing everything in their power to hold cheap access hostage until they get the funding they want.
Of course they don't think of things this way, but try bringing up real research into lowering the cost of access to space, and just about any NASA employee will get real defensive real quick.
NASA was supposed to build the road to space, but they just ended up erecting a permanent construction zone.
To: alnitak
Thanks, but it may be that the title should read, "The End of taxpayer supported Manned Spaceflight Looms Ever Closer." Seems some private people in the Mojave think they can do it. If so, we know they can do it cheaper and better.
11 posted on
07/10/2003 12:00:02 PM PDT by
jammer
To: *Space
Space ping
12 posted on
07/10/2003 2:41:45 PM PDT by
anymouse
To: alnitak
Well ... As long as the earth remains there will be people who will be willing to risk their life to go into space.
Like the recent disaster proves - the wives all said their husbands were doing what they loved to do; knowing the risk.
13 posted on
07/10/2003 3:51:20 PM PDT by
CyberAnt
( America - You Are The Greatest!!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson