1 posted on
07/10/2003 2:04:35 AM PDT by
DPB101
To: DPB101
bump
To: DPB101
BTT
3 posted on
07/10/2003 2:08:57 AM PDT by
nopardons
To: All
GOD BLESS OUR MILITARY AND THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
|
|
Keep Our Republic Free
Or mail checks to FreeRepublic , LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
|
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER It's on the Breaking News Sidebar |
4 posted on
07/10/2003 2:09:51 AM PDT by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: DPB101
One can only hope that these scumbags are emboldened enough to crawl out into the light and be exposed for what they are. Mainstream America does not yet really know about these movements to any great degree.
To: DPB101
recommending that the age of consent for sexual acts be lowered to 12 years of age,"
Do you all remember what you were like when you were 12? Just like 15, 16, and even 17, it's an age of innocence, and an age when you don't really understand much about the world. I believe the age of consent will be lowered and lowered and over just a few more years, and soon it will be 13 and above.
6 posted on
07/10/2003 2:27:07 AM PDT by
bets
To: DPB101
7 posted on
07/10/2003 2:31:53 AM PDT by
chance33_98
(http://home.frognet.net/~thowell/haunt/ ---->our ghosty page)
To: DPB101
bump
To: DPB101
It's gut-wrenching to see this unfold with so little public outcry :-(
14 posted on
07/10/2003 8:01:13 AM PDT by
Tamzee
(Peace is the prerogative of the victorious, not the vanquished.... Churchill)
To: DPB101
What is it with academicians and perverts? They're around children all day and they get urges?
The fact that this insult to our children is even being discussed is disturbing, but I have no doubt the SCOTUS will find a compelling state interest in our children being buggered.
The mere fact that a Justice sits on the high court who is on record for lowering the age of consent to 12 shows that these people are out of touch with the society they rule over.
Little by little the unelected elite of the SCOTUS are altering our society in a fashion of their own European/Socialist design. If it is the fashion in Paris, or Brussels, to bugger children then SCOTUS will make sure that Americans can be just as "enlightened". Who can stop them?
The People can stop them, and should before they do our children, and society, irreparable harm. Unelected, elitist, judges must be held accountable to The People for their actions.
To convey upon appointed Justices the mantle of immunity is to thrust upon society the burden of their errors.
17 posted on
07/10/2003 12:42:26 PM PDT by
Noachian
(Legislation without Representation has no place in a free Republic)
To: DPB101
"Kinsey worked to lower penalties for sex offenders and said he couldn't understand why children were harmed by being sexually touched by adults," Knight continued. "He based this on a series of sex experiments on children as young as 2 months of age. A chapter in Sexual Behavior in the Human Male reports on the molestation of hundreds of boys, with Kinsey concluding that the victims enjoyed the activity."
WHY wasn't this person arrested? It's currently ILLEGAL to molest children as young as TWO MONTHS of age!
Psssssssssst ... daycare folks also "experiment" with little ones. Not all but MANY pedaphiles work for "daycare" centers. I know of a couple people who've had their children come home with rashes, inflamation, urinary track infections etc.. since attending daycare. If the kids are able to speak they can when probbed describe what happened with the perp BUT to prosecute there must be OVERWHELMNING evidence of this so many parents just pull their kids from THAT daycare and put them in another and hope for the best.
18 posted on
07/10/2003 1:05:04 PM PDT by
nmh
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson