Skip to comments.
Bill Would Lower U.S. Contribution to U.N. by $240 Million
Talon News ^
| 07/09/03
| Jimmy Moore
Posted on 07/09/2003 6:45:02 AM PDT by bedolido
WASHINGTON (Talon News) -- Rep. J. D. Hayworth, a Republican Congressman from Arizona, and seven co-sponsors have submitted a bill in the U.S. House of Representatives that would lower the amount of money the United States sends to the United Nations by more than $240 million per year.
Hayworth's bill, H.R. 2303, would make the contribution by the U.S. to the U.N. equal to the largest contribution from any of the other four permanent, veto-wielding members of the U.N. Security Council.
"Our veto power should cost no more than that of the other permanent members, China, France, Russia, or the United Kingdom," remarked Rep. Hayworth. "Even though their combined Gross Domestic Product nearly equals that of the U.S., we contribute about $115 million more to the U.N. regular budget than those four countries combined. That doesn't make sense, and Congress should put a stop to it."
Currently, the law requires the United States to contribute a fixed 22 percent of the U.N.'s administrative budget. In 2003, the U.S. contribution to the U.N. budget was $341 million. Under the Hayworth proposal, the U.S. payment would be lowered to $100 million annually, matching France's 6.5 percent contribution to the budget. France is the second highest contributor to the U.N.
"The current dues arrangement is particularly objectionable when you consider that each of the other permanent members of the Security Council regularly vote against U.S. proposals," Hayworth argued. "Equal power should be matched by equal dues."
State Department records show that in 2002 China voted against the U.S. over 80 percent of the time. Russia disagreed with the U.S. 78 percent of the time. Great Britain and France both voted with the U.S. 50 percent of the time.
Hayworth is hopeful that his bill will inspire a larger debate about the future role of the U.S. in the U.N.
"The outrages are not limited to the meltdown over Iraq," he said. "Cuba began its recent crackdown on dissidents as it was elected to a new three-year term on the U.N.'s human rights commission. That commission is being chaired by Libya and includes some of the worst abusers of human rights in the world, including Vietnam, Syria, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, and Zimbabwe."
Hayworth warns that something must be done, or the U.N. will become useless.
"There must be reforms if the United Nations is to avoid being reduced to an irrelevant international theater of the absurd," he predicted.
This bill is currently in the House Committee on International Relations.
The seven co-sponsors of the bill are Rep. Todd Akin (R-MO), Rep. Gresham Barrett (R-SC), Rep. Tom Feeney (R-FL), Rep. Wally Herger (R-CA), Rep. Walter B. Jones, Jr. (R-NC), Rep. Jack Kingston (R-GA), and Rep. Ron Lewis (R-KY).
Copyright © 2003 Talon News -- All rights reserved.
TOPICS: Extended News; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 240; bill; contribution; hr2303; million; turass; un
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 next last
1
posted on
07/09/2003 6:45:03 AM PDT
by
bedolido
To: bedolido
Let Ted Turner pony up the difference.
Or we could offset the amount by 'booting' the diplo-plate scofflaws.
To: Semper Paratus
We'll burn $114 million in a couple weeks of operation Liberia Freedom crapola. This is a (sorry) attempt to keep conservatives thinking that the GOP has not jumped into bed with the radical interventionists.
3
posted on
07/09/2003 6:49:04 AM PDT
by
JohnGalt
(They're All Lying)
To: All
Raise Your Hand If You Want To Donate To Free Republic!
|
|
Donate Here By Secure Server
Or mail checks to FreeRepublic , LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
|
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD- It is in the breaking news sidebar!
|
4
posted on
07/09/2003 6:49:41 AM PDT
by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: bedolido
Well, it's a start.
5
posted on
07/09/2003 6:54:20 AM PDT
by
FierceDraka
("I am not a number - I am a FREE MAN!")
To: JohnGalt
We'll burn $114 million in a couple weeks of operation Liberia Freedom crapola. This is a (sorry) attempt to keep conservatives thinking that the GOP has not jumped into bed with the radical interventionists. Libertarians will bash republicans if they
1) Raise UN dues
2) Lower UN dues
3) Make no change
4) All of the above
5) Whenever
6) Just because
6
posted on
07/09/2003 6:54:27 AM PDT
by
cinFLA
To: bedolido
I still say that we quit the UN and toss their sorry asses off of American soil.
7
posted on
07/09/2003 6:56:31 AM PDT
by
Sofa King
(-I am Sofa King- tired of liberal BS!)
To: bedolido
Hear! Hear! And then demand a refund of our overages.
8
posted on
07/09/2003 6:57:10 AM PDT
by
mtbopfuyn
To: cinFLA
7) Because they can.
8) Because they want to.
9) Because they don't want to.
9
posted on
07/09/2003 6:57:36 AM PDT
by
BlueLancer
(Der Elite Møøsenspåånkængruppen ØberKømmååndø (EMØØK))
To: cinFLA
Libertarians will support Republicans if they:
a) Cease all un-Consitutional US taxpayer payments to the UN
b) Withdraw from the UN
c) Either a or b
10
posted on
07/09/2003 6:59:23 AM PDT
by
JohnGalt
(They're All Lying)
To: Sofa King
Yes, Yes, and hel* Yes.
11
posted on
07/09/2003 7:02:01 AM PDT
by
chiefqc
To: JohnGalt
Libertarians throw fits whenever anything short of their goals are achieved, even if what is achieved is progress towards their goals. Immaturity has no better standards-bearers.
12
posted on
07/09/2003 7:02:52 AM PDT
by
=Intervention=
(White devils for Sharpton Central Florida chapter)
Currently, the law requires the United States to contribute a fixed 22 percent of the U.N.'s administrative budget.What law? Whose law? Can somebody please explain this to me?
To: bedolido
Good! Screw the UN.
14
posted on
07/09/2003 7:04:29 AM PDT
by
rintense
(Freedom is contagious, and everyone wants to catch it!)
To: bedolido
Thank you... sounds like a step in the right direction :-)
15
posted on
07/09/2003 7:05:08 AM PDT
by
Tamzee
(Peace is the prerogative of the victorious, not the vanquished.... Churchill)
To: bedolido
"Hayworth warns that something must be done, or the U.N. will become useless." They are already useless. Now, hut them down.
16
posted on
07/09/2003 7:06:09 AM PDT
by
blam
To: blam
hut=shut.
17
posted on
07/09/2003 7:06:34 AM PDT
by
blam
To: =Intervention=
Extremism in defense of liberty is no vice, or do you disagree.
Hayworth fought the good fight in voting to withhold payments to the UN a few years ago, now he is only asking for a cut in direct payments to the UN body, while the US takes on more direct roles (see Liberia, Afghanistan, South America, Middle East, Israel/Palestine, Kosovo.) It's a clever rational, but hardly deals with anything besides window dressing the cost of interventionist adventures.
18
posted on
07/09/2003 7:07:47 AM PDT
by
JohnGalt
(They're All Lying)
To: bedolido
How much money actually went to the UN.....admin money, military money, 3rd world development money, NY residence money, etc?
Does anyone know?
I'll bet we give billions more than the 22 percent of admin money mentioned above. And I'll bet that no one else even comes close.
19
posted on
07/09/2003 7:09:00 AM PDT
by
xzins
(Babylon, you have been weighed in the balance and been found wanting!)
To: JohnGalt
We'll burn $114 million in a couple weeks of operation Liberia Freedom crapola. This is a (sorry) attempt to keep conservatives thinking that the GOP has not jumped into bed with the radical interventionists. What specific Liberia Freedom crapola will cost that amount? How did you come up with that number?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson