Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sarasota
My opinion is that a U.S. President should not "visit" any people where the security requirements are such that the "people" aren't actually visited.

If the Senegals made the decision to "detain" it's people for the event, we (the U.S. Gov.) should make a big stink about it.

If the U.S. Gov. knew in advance that this would happen and went along with it, that was a stupid decision.

12 posted on 07/08/2003 10:04:21 AM PDT by Positive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Positive
I agree. If the residents were overly inconvenienced for the sake of a photo op, then our going along with it was indeed a bad move. A certain amount of inconvenience is to be expected with the visit of any dignitary and I suspect Clinton's visit caused some problems for the locals too (that they now conveniently forget), but if the security precautions were such that they had to evacuate the entire village to stage this event, then perhaps the propriety of holding such an event should have been seriously questioned.

Bad publicity goes alot farther than good publicity.
18 posted on 07/08/2003 10:19:04 AM PDT by XRdsRev
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Positive
Opinions,opinions,opinions well you know the saying!!
24 posted on 07/08/2003 11:55:29 AM PDT by cksharks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson