Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ChocChipCookie
And now not even the Buffett Foundation will be donating money to any non-profit organization.

No, no, no, no, no. What Buffett did was to let the Pampered Chef off the hook--agreeing that that particular business would not have to contribute to his "foundation." But Buffett controls lots of other businesses whose employees would not dare to stop him from using their labor to fund his nightmare enterprise. So the foundation's work will go on . . . and its major task will continue to be the promotion of baby-killing. Buffett is a very, very bad man.

22 posted on 07/03/2003 7:01:51 PM PDT by madprof98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: madprof98
All businesses that fall under the Berkshire Hathaway umbrella are included in this decision.

Here is what is wrong with the methods and reasoning of so many pro-lifers: it's ALL or NOTHING. A small step in the right directions is derided with cynical responses, "it's not enough," "how about all the other corporations," blah, blah, blah. The reason the pro-gay agenda has gotten so far, to the point of gay marriage becoming a very real possibility here in the USA, is because they realized that every little decision would eventually add up to their ultimate goals.

I'm thrilled with this decision. It's not a tiny step. After all, WB holds a huge amount of sway in the business world. I wonder how soon it will be before other coroporations follow his lead.
30 posted on 07/03/2003 8:58:24 PM PDT by ChocChipCookie (Beware: the Chip is pissed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson