Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MJY1288
This is an excellent analysis, although I don't agree with Hitchens on all of the details. I wasn't going to read the book, but I received it as a Christmas gift so I did.

I found it superficial and heavily weighted towards the State Department. What was most irrritating to me was the inference that the conquest of Afghanistan was almost an accident. This comes, no doubt, from the fact that the Defense Department didn't give Woodward much information.

7 posted on 06/18/2003 6:51:17 PM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Miss Marple
Interesting. I read it just last month. I thought it was a great read. Superficial? Maybe I suppose, but so would anything written by someone not actually an "insider". Woodward is a journalist, and as such would be treated like an outsider to the "war council" group. That he was able to show any of the inner working of the administration was surprising to me.

I thought the book was surprisingly favorable toward the administration.
8 posted on 06/18/2003 7:02:26 PM PDT by Ramius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson