Why is it that different? When you buy Pampered Chef, the money is not going straight to Planned Parenthood. It must go through quite a few hands first. If you are not responsible for the pot that was bought, then how can you be responsible for the abortionists getting your money? You are responsible for 1 step of your money. If Pampered Chef had a policy of giving donations directly to Planned Parenthood, then absolutely.
But because a Foundation run by a Company that has several layers of companies between itself and a Pampered Chef customer gives a small portion of their charitable giving to baby killers, that's a direct connection? Sorry, that doesn't wash.
But because a Foundation run by a Company that has several layers of companies between itself and a Pampered Chef customer gives a small portion of their charitable giving to baby killers, that's a direct connection? Sorry, that doesn't wash.Looks like a straight line to me. OK, how about this one. Achmed the corner grocery owner sells part of the store to his nephew Amir. Amir is a member of Hamas and his share ends up funding terrorism. You find this out. Achmed is no terrorist, but he can't or won't sever ties with Amir, even though part of their profits goes to Hamas. Do you still shop the corner grocery?