Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush Presidency is Advancing the Progressive Agenda
Sierra Times ^ | 6-17-03 | John Bender

Posted on 06/17/2003 5:07:22 AM PDT by SUSSA

Democrats may be worried that George Bush is unbeatable in 2004, but President Bush’s strength is good news for progressives. No president since LBJ has been as successful in expanding government and increasing the size and scope of social programs as this president. Presidents Carter and Clinton didn’t even come close to matching President Bush’s accomplishments in expanding government social programs. George Bush increased government size and spending more in his first two years than Bill Clinton did in his first six years. By the end of this year, he will have expanded government more than Bill Clinton did in his entire eight-year administration.

To be fair, Bill Clinton had to fight the conservatives in Congress who threw up every roadblock they could muster to thwart his progressive agenda. George Bush has not only silenced the conservative wing of the Republican Party, he has ground them into pulp and made them toothless tigers.

There is no longer any serious talk about making government smaller or eliminating government departments or programs. Smaller government used to be the bedrock principal of the Republican Party. President Bush changed that and is pushing Republicans in Congress not just to accept bigger government, but to embrace it.

Instead of eliminating the Education Department, George Bush almost doubled its size and pushed through the largest increase in funding the department ever enjoyed. He and Ted Kennedy worked closely together to make sure that the federal government also has more power over local schools than ever before.

The testing mandated by the education bill, and the mandate that schools meet minimum standards is a brilliant maneuver that will demand the standards and the tests be controlled centrally from Washington. No one will be able to oppose national standards and a national testing system. Without national standards, testing is subjective and worthless. National standards and a standardized national test will require local schools teach to the test. That means Washington will be dictating the curriculum in every school in America. Bill Clinton and Al Gore couldn’t even dream of accomplishing this much progress.

In other areas President Bush also out performed President Clinton. He expanded other programs the Contract With America targeted for elimination. He expanded Americorps, the Peace Corps, the National Endowment for the Arts, the National Endowment for the Humanities, and Head Start.

Working closely with progressive Republicans and Democrats, George Bush passed the farm bill that dismantled the Freedom to Farm Act that conservative Republicans pushed through Congress, and President Clinton signed, in 1996. This new legislation boosts farm spending to record levels. President Bush’s farm bill not only increased old subsidies, it created new subsidies our farmers never had before. No Democrat president could have pushed this legislation through a Republican controlled Congress. The conservative wing of the party still holds some powerful positions in Congress, especially in the House. They were proud of the Freedom to Farm Act and would have fought tooth and nail with a Democrat president to keep it in place. They caved in to President Bush without even a hint of a fight. President Bush effectively cut the conservatives in Congress off at the knees on this legislation and on most of their domestic agenda. He rules the Republican Party with an iron fist and conservatives are unable to out maneuver him.

President Bush signed the Campaign Finance Reform bill into law. Conservative Republicans in Congress are still quietly seething about how he steamrollered them on this. President Bush is also leading the fight to expand Medicare, add prescription drug coverage and mandate mental health coverage. Conservatives kept Presidents Carter and Clinton from adding these entitlements to Medicare. With President Bush pushing the agenda, they aren’t even pretending to oppose these additions.

The president is also leading the fight to extend the child tax credit to low income families excluded from the latest tax cut. He figuratively bitch-slapped Tom Delay and his conservative cohorts who threatened to derail the expanded credit, urging the Republicans to pass the bill quickly and send it to him for his signature. While progressive Republicans like to claim President Bush is following President Reagan’s vision for America, he is actually following President Nixon’s agenda to the letter. President Nixon never tried to eliminate any government program or agency. He expanded government as much as he could. Few people remember that it was President Nixon who created the Environmental Protection Agency, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration and the National Endowment for the Arts. Fewer still remember that it was President Nixon who tied Social Security benefits to the cost of living. President Bush is surpassing President Nixon in advancing progressive social policy.

President Bush is also making talk radio safe for progressives. Hosts who would have railed against President Clinton, or any Democrat, for pushing the progressive agenda President Bush is implementing, excuse this president for it. Many of them attack any conservative who calls to point out that President Bush is a progressive. Even Rush Limbaugh is leery of taking on this president. While he occasionally offers some mild criticism of the president, he always follows that criticism by offering excuses for the president’s actions and progressive domestic agenda. This is partially due to the attacks that come from the Bush cultists any time anyone is anything but worshipful of their guy. Like Democrats who refused to believe that President Clinton was capable of doing any wrong, there is a group of Republicans who would support President Bush no matter how far left he governs. They attack anyone and any group who points out that President Bush is not conservative. Many of these people are domestic progressives who like big government and benefit from government programs. They call themselves conservatives; many of them really think they are conservatives. In fact, they support progressive social programs and most benefit from them. They are critical of the poor who receive government help, but enjoy generous government subsidies of their own lifestyles. Many talk show hosts fall into this category themselves.

The other reason even real conservatives are leery of voicing anything except the mildest criticism of President Bush is they fear retaliation from the administration. They fear being cut off from the information loop. They fear being dropped from the administration’s fax and E-mail grapevine. Their professional status is greatly enhanced by access to administration sources and President Bush is not shy about diminishing or eliminating that access for anyone who puts their principals ahead of support for his agenda.

All things considered, progressives are much better off with President Bush in office than they would be with any of his Democrat challengers. No Democrat on the scene today can come close to matching President Bush’s ability to advance the progressive agenda and marginalize the conservatives in the Republican Party. Four more years of a Bush administration will produce progressive gains that are only matched by FDR’s accomplishments. Rather than being disappointed that they don’t have a Democrat in the presidency, progressives should be thankful they have an ideological soul mate in office. For progressives the cry should be “FOUR MORE YEARS!”

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- John Bender is a freelance writer from Dallas, Texas. His columns have appeared in The Dallas Morning News, Ether Zone, Right Magazine, The Sierra Times, USA Daily and other print and online publications. Your feedback is welcome.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bush; bushdoctrine; politics
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 641-655 next last
To: xrp
bump
21 posted on 06/17/2003 5:51:44 AM PDT by Centurion2000 (We are crushing our enemies, seeing him driven before us and hearing the lamentations of the liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ActionNewsBill
By the end of this year, he will have expanded government more than Bill Clinton did in his entire eight-year administration.

Huh, no statistics, just opinion. Also nothing about the tax cuts.

Can anyone say personal agenda?

22 posted on 06/17/2003 5:52:23 AM PDT by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SUSSA
bump...thanks for the post.
23 posted on 06/17/2003 5:52:53 AM PDT by Lady Eileen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
the fake ones that have infiltrated us

Ok, if pointing out facts and making my opinons known about an article that is, IMO, missing facts makes me a "fake one", so be it.

King Todd has decreed it so.

24 posted on 06/17/2003 5:56:46 AM PDT by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Dane
look around dane there has been thread after thread here that point out why Bush is not a conservative or a friend of conservatives. But the socialist here at FR like Bush have spread the lies and slammed those that told the truth.
25 posted on 06/17/2003 5:58:43 AM PDT by TLBSHOW (which can do more damage an elected rat or a rat like Matt Lauer on the lowest rated TV show?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SUSSA
You spend an awful lot of time attacking Reagan. Is it because Reagan is too conservative for your taste? Or is it because you can only defend Bush by trying to tear down Reagan?

I'm not attacking Reagan, he was the best President of the 20th century, IMO.

Just bringing up the tax increases that Reagan signed for historical perspective to show that Reagan was a pragmatic politician and not an infallible demigod that some on FR think he was.

26 posted on 06/17/2003 5:59:59 AM PDT by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ActionNewsBill
I don't think it's defensible using any language a conservative might understand. But I am interested in the reason why he's going nuts with this stuff. Is it because he loves big government? Is he trying to steal our freedom? Does he really think this stuff will "work"? Or has he calculated that he cannot be re-elected unless he yields to the spenders?

Because even though he is not a conservative, the Left hates him anyway. So why bother?

27 posted on 06/17/2003 6:01:27 AM PDT by big gray tabby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SUSSA
Ya see the real problem is Bill and Hillary destroyed via neglect the US Military
Rather than maintain equipment they allowed it to break down and now instead of being able to keep many things long term via preventive maintainance...we have had to replace them
Units that have had no money for men equipment or training had to expend ten times more money in order to get back up to strength and readiness
The Clintons have allowed the infrastructure of many institutions to languish as they pursued a social agenda designed to line their pockets and expand programs to their constituency
Unfortunately their constituents dont pay much into govt as take it out...nor do they provide others with employment...
So with the Clintons spending we dont get any return...
At least with GW we will see some return and economic benefit long term
Or would if we would get rid of illegal aliens and dump NAFTA n Gat and China
28 posted on 06/17/2003 6:01:33 AM PDT by joesnuffy (Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dane
Huh, no statistics, just opinion. Also nothing about the tax cuts.

There should be pretty good statistics on the lack of spending cuts whatsoever and in the monstruous expansion of the gov't's budget deficit.

Incidentally, W's anemic tax cuts which, by the way, make the tax code even more 'progressive' (the commies love that), are about to be more than matched by all kinds of tax increases at the state and local level.

29 posted on 06/17/2003 6:02:31 AM PDT by A Vast RightWing Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
look around dane there has been thread after thread here that point out why Bush is not a conservative or a friend of conservatives. But the socialist here at FR like Bush have spread the lies and slammed those that told the truth

Yes, a thread here and a thread there spouting off personal opinions. Nothing wrong with that, that's the American way, but it my right to bring facts into the mix to counterbalance, IMO, the kneejerking these threads here and threads there bring about.

30 posted on 06/17/2003 6:03:21 AM PDT by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Dane
Can anyone say personal agenda?

If he was the only Conservative saying this, I might agree.

Bush is getting flack from almost everybody on the conservative side.

The liberals on the other hand are silent or are praising his name.

31 posted on 06/17/2003 6:03:28 AM PDT by ActionNewsBill (Police state? What police state?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: big gray tabby
But I am interested in the reason why he's going nuts with this stuff. Is it because he loves big government? Is he trying to steal our freedom? Does he really think this stuff will "work"? Or has he calculated that he cannot be re-elected unless he yields to the spenders?

Yes. Yes. He probably believes that. Yes.

And, in the end... it's the men behind the curtain that matter.

32 posted on 06/17/2003 6:05:40 AM PDT by A Vast RightWing Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: SUSSA
Bush has expanded Americorps, the Peace Corps, the National Endowment for the Arts, the National Endowment for the Humanities, Head Start.....

Their supporters all appreciate it greatly.......& will all still vote Democratic.

33 posted on 06/17/2003 6:05:47 AM PDT by Republic If You Can Keep It
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: big gray tabby
But I am interested in the reason why he's going nuts with this stuff.

Is it because he loves big government?

Is he trying to steal our freedom?

Does he really think this stuff will "work"?

Or has he calculated that he cannot be re-elected unless he yields to the spenders?

Answers....Yes, Yes, Yes, and Yes.

34 posted on 06/17/2003 6:06:02 AM PDT by ActionNewsBill (Police state? What police state?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: big gray tabby
the Left hates him anyway.
.....


and today on the Rush Limbaugh show he will make that same point and so for me the question is

Why is Bush Doing it?
35 posted on 06/17/2003 6:06:39 AM PDT by TLBSHOW (which can do more damage an elected rat or a rat like Matt Lauer on the lowest rated TV show?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Dane
Also nothing about the tax cuts.

Yes, GWB has done some good stuff. Tax cuts, medmal proposals, Kyoto, Michigan affirmative action case, the OSHA ergonomics thing...

Nevertheless, so far as domestic policies, he has been mediocre at best. Now, political realities may have prevented him from doing more we would like and forced him to do stuff we don't like, but it would be nice if....

He did not do stuff that is so obviously bad - to conservatives - so enthusiastically...

Rather than making excuses, even as we accept the 'reality' of the situation, we clearly state that w lot of what he is doing is hardly conservative.

36 posted on 06/17/2003 6:07:27 AM PDT by RJCogburn (He's a short, feisty fellow with a messed up lower lip.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Dane
but it my right to bring facts into the mix to counterbalance, IMO, the kneejerking these threads here and threads there bring about.

Bring on some facts, not this "IMO" crap.

37 posted on 06/17/2003 6:07:28 AM PDT by ActionNewsBill (Police state? What police state?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: big gray tabby
the Left hates him anyway. So why bother?

Yes the left will always hate him. This is for the mushy middle, which wins elections, and this is only my opinion, but he is just trying to take away the demogougic spears the left throws and the mushy middle believes.

38 posted on 06/17/2003 6:07:36 AM PDT by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Destructor
<>i>Bill Clinton didn't have to deal with a crappy economy, and fight a war.

Yeah you're right, the war and the economy is forcing GWB into positions like embracing a 200 billion farm bill, Teddy Kennedy's education plan, a disgusting socialist drug plan (where my family has to pay for rich seniors drugs), expansion of Americorps etc. etc. etc.

Poor little Georgie, just had no choice with this economy and war.

39 posted on 06/17/2003 6:09:10 AM PDT by AAABEST
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Dane
Well I know what I say is Truth and Fact and long before it is known. The gift of course is to see the truth.
40 posted on 06/17/2003 6:09:36 AM PDT by TLBSHOW (which can do more damage an elected rat or a rat like Matt Lauer on the lowest rated TV show?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 641-655 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson