Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: justshutupandtakeit
Did any of them describe the nature of the contacts or the date?
What I saw in the Guardian was about document from 1999 or 1998 and basically told the same story that came out in 99- that Hijazi met w/ bin Laden and nobody knew for sure what they talked about but that there was lots of speculation. Apparently, the 99 contact wasn't the first. Previously bin Laden had truned down Hussein's offer of asylum.

Here's the 99 guardian story http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,3604,314700,00.html

Do the reports that you read refer to a different meeting or have any additional details?

Like I said before, "contact" is a very vague word.
38 posted on 06/22/2003 8:24:28 AM PDT by simonX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: simonX
Without a wire-wearing snoop all information on meetings like this is "vague." That is the nature of the beast. There were dates in the articles and a discussion of the nature of the contacts.

Extended meetings were held which apparently lasted longer than expected and the memos were explanations from the Iraqui side of the need for more funding, accommodations for the participants and meeting expenses.
39 posted on 06/22/2003 7:03:52 PM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (RATS will use any means to denigrate George Bush's Victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson