Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Masters to go commercial-free again in 2004
Associated Press, via Yahoo ^ | June 4, 2003 | by DOUG FERGUSON, Associated Press

Posted on 06/04/2003 1:27:15 PM PDT by D. Brian Carter

Masters to go commercial-free again in 2004 by DOUG FERGUSON, Associated Press

JACKSONVILLE, Fla. (AP) -- Augusta National chairman Hootie Johnson thought the commercial-free broadcast of the Masters in the United States turned out so well he plans to do it again.

Johnson, who dropped his television sponsors last year to keep them out of the controversy over the club's all-male membership, said Tuesday the 2004 Masters again would have no sponsors or commercial interruptions.

``There were many aspects of last year's broadcast that were favorable,'' Johnson said in a statement. ``The response from our TV viewers about the ability to watch strictly golf was very positive.''

Final-round coverage on CBS Sports -- 4 1/2 hours without commercials -- attracted 34.5 million viewers, the third-highest for Sunday at the Masters. Mike Weir became the first Canadian to win a major, defeating Len Mattiace in a sudden-death playoff.

The Masters drew even more attention this year because of the club's all-male membership. Martha Burk, head of the National Council of Women's Organization, led a campaign to demand the club invite a female member.

Johnson responded with a terse, three-page statement in which he said Augusta National would invite a woman on its own timetable, ``and not at the point of a bayonet.''

Johnson then dropped the Masters' three television sponsors -- Coca-Cola, Citigroup and IBM -- to shield them from controversy.

Burk could not be reached for comment.

The club lost an undisclosed amount of money because there was no advertising revenue. It was believed Augusta National also helped CBS Sports pay for the production costs.

Johnson said during the Masters there was a ``good chance'' of TV sponsors returning. Asked how long the tournament could go without sponsors, he said, ``Indefinitely.''

The loss of revenues did not affect charity. Augusta National also said Tuesday it has given $3.2 million to various organizations, plus a $100,000 donation to the Sept. 11 Relief Fund. The club contributed $3.3 million to charity last year.

The membership controversy lasted nine months, and resulted in the resignation of club member Thomas Wyman and Treasury Secretary John Snow, who quit Augusta National so it wouldn't be a topic at his confirmation hearings.

Burk protested on Saturday of the Masters in a grassy lot about a half-mile from the club entrance, although only about 40 supporters were on hand.

She has continued her campaign. Two weeks ago, she criticized Bank of America for offering an exemption to Annika Sorenstam to play in the Colonial, while at the same time allowing its chief executive to keep his membership at Augusta National.

Club spokesman Glenn Greenspan said the decision to go commercial-free next year was no indication the membership debate remained a problem for corporate sponsors.

``We had no discussions with our past sponsors or any potential sponsors,'' Greenspan said. ``We received a great deal of positive feedback about the broadcast of this year's tournament, and based on that, the club decided the Masters would continue the commercial-free format for another year.''


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; US: Georgia
KEYWORDS: hootiejohnson; marthaburk; masters; ncwo; pga
The continuation of a brilliant strategy... this Burk "story" is gonna die a slow death.
1 posted on 06/04/2003 1:27:16 PM PDT by D. Brian Carter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: D. Brian Carter
I like that this keeps Burk and her lackeys from doing anything actually relevant. Maybe we can find some other nonsense issue for her to waste even more time on?
2 posted on 06/04/2003 1:55:34 PM PDT by KellyAdmirer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: D. Brian Carter
"The club lost an undisclosed amount of money because there was no advertising revenue."

Not at all. The Club didn't "lose" any money - they wisely chose to forego direct income from advertising and the money they WOULD have take in is, instead, a de-facto self-advertising expense. They're not OUT any money - they just chose not to take any IN.

Michael

3 posted on 06/04/2003 2:06:35 PM PDT by Wright is right! (Have a profitable day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: D. Brian Carter; FreedomPoster; dansangel
As a native Georgian, golfer, and Masters fan, I would like to extend a "thank you" to Mizz Burke whose irrelevant and self-centered protest brought forth the elimination of the already limited commercials during Masters broadcasts.

Bobby Jones and Lewis Grizzard are laughing together about this up in heaven.

4 posted on 06/04/2003 5:32:16 PM PDT by Vigilantcitizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: viligantcitizen
LOL! You're right, except I doubt they're laughing - howling is probably more like it.

And as the sign said, "Iron My Shirt", Martha.
5 posted on 06/04/2003 5:34:56 PM PDT by FreedomPoster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson