Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US Prepares Battle Force To Wipe Out Hardline Iraqi Resistance
The Guardian (UK) ^ | 6-3-2003 | Rory McCarthy/Evan MacAskill

Posted on 06/03/2003 5:15:04 PM PDT by blam

US prepares battle force to wipe out hardline Iraqi resistance

Rory McCarthy in Baghdad and Ewen MacAskill
Tuesday June 3, 2003
The Guardian (UK)

A force of more than 1,500 US troops, backed by tanks and armoured vehicles, is to take control of two towns near Baghdad that are thought to be sheltering Iraqi fighters still loyal to Saddam Hussein. In the next 10 days, battle-hardened troops of the US army's 3rd Infantry Division will be sent into Falluja and Habaniya, west of Baghdad. The troops, who led the invasion of Iraq and the capture of Baghdad, will be backed up by 88 Abrams tanks and 44 Bradley fighting vehicles.

They will saturate the area with checkpoints and conduct search operations, targeting Ba'ath party supporters and other militias from the towns.

Last week, two American soldiers were killed and nine were injured in Falluja when a group of Iraqis opened fire at a checkpoint.

Many in the town speak openly of their loyalty to the former regime and are deeply critical of the US presence.

Meanwhile Tony Blair's special envoy on human rights, Ann Clwyd, came under gunfire in northern Iraq yesterday.

Ms Clwyd, Labour MP for Cynon Valley, who has been in Iraq for a week looking at mass graves, was travelling near the oil city of Kirkuk in an eight-strong convoy, protected by US soldiers and Kurdish peshmerga.

She told her Westminster office that about eight to ten bandits opened fire on the convoy. The US soldiers and the peshmerga gave chase but no one was caught. No one was hurt in the incident.

While the US is still facing serious security problems in Iraq, there were also new hurdles yesterday in the slow-moving political process.

Iraqi political leaders rejected plans by the American-led authority in Baghdad to appoint the first elements of a new government, insisting instead that Iraqis should choose their own leaders.

At a meeting with the seven major political groups on Sunday Paul Bremer, the US official running Iraq, presented a plan under which he would appoint a political council of between 25 and 30 Iraqis to form the core of a future government.

But the parties yesterday insisted on a more democratic process. "We think this is not the right thing to do," said Hamed al-Bayati, a spokesman for the powerful Shia religious party, the Supreme Council for Islamic Revolution in Iraq.

He was speaking after the seven parties met in a Baghdad hotel to discuss Mr Bremer's proposal.

"We believe according to the UN resolution that the Iraqi people should select their own administration in consultation with the allies," Dr Bayati said. "This is a joint view of all the parties. We are going to go on with our own choice, which is an Iraqi mechanism to select an Iraqi administration."

Under the latest UN security council resolution on Iraq, approved a fortnight ago, Iraqis have a clear right to choose their political future.

Already the US-led authority has found some of its decisions highly unpopular. Yesterday at least 3,000 former soldiers protested outside the heavily guarded Republican Palace, where Mr Bremer's authority is based, at the decision to dissolve the 400,000-strong Iraqi army. Many of the sacked soldiers threatened armed resistance against the US unless they were given new jobs.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 3rdid; battle; bushdoctrineunfold; falluja; force; habaniya; iraq; iraqi; prepares; resistance; us; westernfront
Time for some more smack down.
1 posted on 06/03/2003 5:15:04 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blam
>>Many in the town speak openly of their loyalty to the former regime and are deeply critical of the US presence. <<

And that's just the journalists!
2 posted on 06/03/2003 5:17:24 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler (This tagline has been banned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Many of the sacked soldiers threatened armed resistance against the US unless they were given new jobs.

OK, I say give them the wages Saddam gave them and drop them in Pakistan to hunt down Bin Laden et al.

3 posted on 06/03/2003 5:18:37 PM PDT by AndrewC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AndrewC
giggle.
4 posted on 06/03/2003 5:22:09 PM PDT by patriciaruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: blam
Memo to Saddam loyalists: get thee to a lawyer and make thee thy will.
5 posted on 06/03/2003 5:24:10 PM PDT by Imagine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
"Yesterday at least 3,000 former soldiers protested outside the heavily guarded Republican Palace, where Mr Bremer's authority is based, at the decision to dissolve the 400,000-strong Iraqi army. Many of the sacked soldiers threatened armed resistance against the US unless they were given new jobs."

This one is too easy. Give the 3000 soldiers a job manning the border with Iran, under the control of the Americans. And if these soldiers do their job protecting Iraq then we'll consider giving them weapons.

6 posted on 06/03/2003 5:26:07 PM PDT by roadcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
I've got a job for them...turn eachother in for money.
7 posted on 06/03/2003 5:28:38 PM PDT by PoorMuttly (who's this "Hussein" guy hiding in my garage...?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: roadcat
They ought to give them a shovel and let them repair the damage Saddam did to the habitat of the Marsh Arabs. (I'm sure they view themselves as some sort of 'elites.')
8 posted on 06/03/2003 5:31:36 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: PoorMuttly
UR#7........I've got a job for them...turn eachother in for money.

Rihgt!

......and,.......'pardons' all around!

(to include French citizenship too.)

9 posted on 06/03/2003 5:34:24 PM PDT by maestro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: maestro
These sound like pretty tough (nuts) soldiers...so French citizenship is beneath them. Perhaps they could run the French government, though. You don't have to respect the French to do that, evidently.
10 posted on 06/03/2003 5:42:03 PM PDT by PoorMuttly (Oh...he's that O'Sama guy's butler.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: AndrewC
Hmmm. Actually, that's not a bad idea.
11 posted on 06/03/2003 5:42:32 PM PDT by Prodigal Son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AndrewC
Good idea!
12 posted on 06/03/2003 5:55:32 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (Where is Saddam? and his Weapons of Mass Destruction?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: blam; *Bush Doctrine Unfold; randita; SierraWasp; Carry_Okie; okie01; socal_parrot; snopercod; ...
We have been too gentle !

Bush Doctrine Unfolds :

To find all articles tagged or indexed using Bush Doctrine Unfold , click below:
  click here >>> Bush Doctrine Unfold <<< click here  
(To view all FR Bump Lists, click here)



13 posted on 06/03/2003 5:57:14 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (Where is Saddam? and his Weapons of Mass Destruction?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
US Prepares Battle Force To Wipe Out Hardline Iraqi Resistance

If these "hardline" guys are smart, they'd be more scared than those kids in
the John Wayne movie "The Cowboys" when Bruce Dern threatens to come back
"on tippy-toe" in the night to kill them.
14 posted on 06/03/2003 5:57:36 PM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam; All
For a powerful read see this:

Commentary: Hoping Americans stay forever

------------------------------------------------

Excerpt

<------------------------------------------

It is not widely reported, nor fashionable to say the Americans are loved and wanted in Iraq, but in fact as they were wanted before the war, they are wanted now.

"We hope they stay forever" is the true feeling of the silent majority in Iraq, contrary to what is reported.

The logic is very simple -- the Iraqis do not trust their leaders. Faced with a very complicated situation of a 60 percent Shiite majority, a former police state, Iran at their doorstep trying with all its might to destabilize their country, and desperately relieved and happy to be finally liberated from nearly 30 years of Saddam, they want the United States to stay.

15 posted on 06/03/2003 5:59:41 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (Where is Saddam? and his Weapons of Mass Destruction?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
"We believe according to the UN resolution that the Iraqi people should select their own administration in consultation with the allies," Dr Bayati said. "This is a joint view of all the parties. We are going to go on with our own choice, which is an Iraqi mechanism to select an Iraqi administration."

Uh, I guess nobody told this guy who won the war.

16 posted on 06/03/2003 6:05:11 PM PDT by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Thanks, I read that.
17 posted on 06/03/2003 6:17:34 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson