But I don't care if Iraq had WMD's or not, we still should have gone ahead with the war.
They [Iraq/Saddam/his associates] broke the deal that ended the hostilities the first time. They broke the deal, and since they broke the deal it's only logical that they should face the consequences of breaking the deal.
They broke the deal and they deserved what they got.. Period.
In fact, they should have been punished under Bill Clinton and all this Iraq stuff should have been old news already..
But I don't care if Iraq had WMD's or not, we still should have gone ahead with the war.
Exactly right on both counts. At first glance, this piece reminds me of the one some Brit paper ran saying that we had gotten caught spying on Security Council members. That just kind of fizzled away, didn't it?
MM