Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

clinton wants to change our LAWS? Well, how about this one?
5.29.03 | Mia T

Posted on 05/29/2003 3:27:31 AM PDT by Mia T

 

 

Clinton Wants Change in Presidential Term Limits
Washington Post ^

Reuters Wednesday, May 28, 2003; 8:03 PM

BOSTON (Reuters) - Former President Bill Clinton said on Wednesday Congress should change the rule that barred him from seeking a third term in the White House, but stopped short of saying he wants to return as commander-in-chief.

Speaking at the John F. Kennedy Library and Museum here, Clinton questioned certain aspects of the 22nd Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which prevents a person from being elected president more than twice.

I'd say that as it pertains to the clintons,
it's more important that

we get the
FORD BUILDING RAPE EVIDENCE RELEASED



& that we change
the statute of limitations

.



--retroactively--
on
RAPE
Q ERTY3BUMP!

Shays Reveals Details of Clinton's 'Horrific' Broaddrick Rape

 

Arkansas nursing home operator Juanita Broaddrick told impeachmentinvestigators she was raped not once but twice by Bill Clinton during a brutal attack in a Little Rock hotel room 22 years ago, Connecticut Congressman Christopher Shays revealed Wednesday.

Shays was one of forty moderate congressional Republicans to visit the Ford Building evidence room during the House impeachment probe, where Broaddrick's accusation and documentation of other alleged Clinton crimes were made available for review.

Five days after Clinton was impeached by the House, Shays told the New York Times that the evidence was, "very alarming and very unsettling,"involving, "conduct by the president that is alleged to be pretty horrific."

 In his comments to the Times Shays made no mention of the second attack on Broaddrick.

But when asked about the Ford Building evidence on Wednesday by WELI New Haven talk-radio host Tom Scott, Shays replied, "I believed that he had done it. I believed her that she had been raped 20 years ago. And it was vicious rapes, it was twice at the same event."

When Scott asked Shays if he believes the president is a rapist, the congressman replied, "I would like not to say it that way. But the bottom line is that I believe that he did rape Broaddrick."

Shays comments to Scott were first reported by National Review Online late Wednesday.

The reactions of other House members who viewed the evidence at the time suggested that Clinton's assault on Broaddrick was more disturbing than what has been reported in the press since.

Just days after the impeachment vote Arizona Rep. Matt Salmon told the Arizona Republic that what he saw in the Ford Building left him "nauseated." Delaware Rep. Mike Castle was reduced to tears, according to CNBC's Chris Matthews.

The shocking presidential rape evidence briefly moved Shays into the pro-impeachment column, he told the Times after the vote. But a personal meeting with Clinton, Shays said, changed his mind.

Not a single U.S. Senator viewed the Ford Building evidence before voting to acquit Clinton on two articles of impeachment.

 In 1999, Georgia Congressman Bob Barr told NewsMax.com that the Ford Building materials would remain sealed unless the American people demanded their release.

 
 

1- It IS possible to prove by induction (and to confirm using FBI profiling of the POWER ASSERTIVE serial rapist) that the degenerate is a sexual predator and rapist.

2- There IS evidence that clinton raped Broaddrick. There ARE multiple witnesses to whom Broaddrick contemporaneously and independently and consistently told the story of her rape by clinton. There IS a witness to Broaddrick's injuries, shock and torn clothes, who saw all this evidence within minutes of the alleged rape.

3- Virtually ALL rapes have no witnesses to the act, itself. It is virtually ALWAYS a he-said/she-said situation. Credibility of the "he" and the "she" is the key criterion. Clinton is a documented congenital liar and sexual predator. Broaddrick is "squeaky clean" according to NBC. Which one of these two any unbiased jury and/or sane, thinking person would believe is a no-brainer.

4- This is not about "punishing" clinton. It's not about depriving clinton of life or liberty or money. It's about firing clinton. Thus, the standard is different. It is lower.

5- The suggestion that because the alleged rape occurred 21 years ago, it is unprovable, is standard issue clinton claptrap. Crimes of greater age are routinely solved.

6- That the statute of limitations has run is another red herring. The issue here is clinton's fitness to serve, not whether he can be tried for the rape.

Notwithstanding this, there are recent, associated crimes that can resurrect the rape.

NOTE: Heinous crimes (like murder) have no statute of limitations.

Moreover, the argument can fairly be made that the statute of limitations should be extended in this case because clinton and his Arkansas machine intimidated Broaddrick into inaction for those 21 years.

The following, found not in NBC's 23 sanitized minutes but rather on the cutting room floor, applies: Immediately after the rape Broaddrick says she was fearful clinton would send one of his goons up to that hotel room "to dispose of the body."

Broaddrick feared for her life and her well-being, given clinton's reputation for brutality and his very public maltreatment of his numerous other wounded prey; and she feared for her livelihood, given the state regulation of her nursing home(s).   

 

It is natural for man to indulge in the illusions of hope.

We are apt to shut our eyes against a painful truth,

and listen to the song of that siren

till she transforms us into beasts.

Is this the part of wise men,

engaged in a great and arduous struggle for liberty?

Are we disposed to be the number of those

who, having eyes, see not,

and having ears, hear not,

the things which so nearly concern their temporal salvation?

For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost,

I am willing to know the whole truth;

to know the worst, and to provide for it.

Patrick Henry

 

In a dark time, the eye begins to see.

Theodore Roethke

 

 

 

Hamilton (or Madison) discussed the importance of wisdom and virtue in Federalist 57. "The aim of every political constitution is, or ought to be, first to obtain for rulers men who possess most wisdom to discern, and most virtue to pursue, the common good of the society; and in the next place, to take the most effectual precautions for keeping them virtuous whilst they continue to hold their public trust."

(Contrast this with clinton, who recklessly, reflexively and feloniously subordinates the common good to his personal appetites.)

Mia T, THE OTHER NIXON

the logic of pathologic self-interest

by Mia T

 

There was a third chance to get rid of the clintons. In '98, when there was still time to stop bin Laden...

The failure to remove the clintons in '98 was a monumental error and is directly traceable to the logic of pathologic self-interest.

Recall in particular:

  • THE LIEBERMAN PARADIGM: (clinton is an unfit president; therefore clinton must remain president)

 

  • THE SHAYS SYNDROME: (clinton is a rapist; therefore clinton is a fit president)

 

THE LIEBERMAN PARADIGM

Senator Joseph Lieberman's bifurcated Monicagate speech in 1998 on the floor of the Senate was almost universally misperceived as an act of honesty and courage.

In reality, it was neither.

Reduced to its essence, Lieberman's argument was this:

clinton is an unfit president;
therefore, clinton must remain president.

I have called this argument "The Lieberman Paradigm."

Lieberman's argument that sorry day was rightly headed toward clinton's certain ouster when it suddenly made a swift, hairpin 180, as if clinton hacks took over the wheel. . .which they probably did.

What was Joe promised? A place on the 2000 ticket?

To be fair, it was not the Lieberman speech but rather a New York Times apologia that institutionalized this shameless scheme to protect a thoroughly corrupt and repugnant--and--as everyone except The New York Times now acknowledges-- dangerous -- Democrat regime.

The Lieberman Paradigm made its debut in The Times' utterly loony 1996 endorsement of clinton. The Times actually argued -- NOTE: this is NOT satire on my part (nor is it satire, as far as I can discern, on the part of The Times) -- that although bill clinton was a "corrupt," "dysfunctional personality [with} delusions" -- The Times' own words -- we need not -- we must not -- remove bill clinton; we need only remove.the character lobe of bill clinton's brain.

 

THE SHAYS SYNDROME

Not an aberration, the Shays Syndrome was quickly adopted by the entire Senate as its impeachment show trial deus ex machina of choice.

Shays, you may recall, examined the evidence in the Ford Building, concluded that clinton did, indeed, rape Broaddrick -- "VICIOUSLY!" AND "TWICE!" he declared at the time-- and was planning to vote to impeach; he changed his mind, however, after a tete a tete with the rapist.

Any cognitive dissonance Shays may have experienced rendering that verdict was no doubt assuaged by the political plum clinton had given Mrs. (Betsi) Shays...

Each of the 50 senators, on the other hand, cured the cognitive dissonance problem pre-emptively by making certain not to examine the damning Ford Building evidence in the first place.

THE CLINTONS ARE SERIAL RAPISTS.

THE EVIDENCE EXISTS.

WE, THE AMERICAN PEOPLE, MUST DEMAND THE RELEASE OF THE FORD BUILDING EVIDENCE.

I WOULD SUGGEST ATTACKING THIS FROM BOTH THE POLITICAL AND LEGAL FRONTS.

HOW ABOUT IT, FREEPERS?



TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections; US: Arkansas; US: Illinois; US: New York; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: abuseofpower; broaddrick; clinton911; clintoncorruption; clintonfailure; clintonrapacity; clintonrapes; termlimits; theterrorismstupid
The Real Danger of a Fake President:
Post-9/11 Reconsideration of The Placebo President
Democratic Party's Problem Transcends Its Anti-War Contingent

Q ERTY6 utter failurePING!

Thou art arm'd that hath thy crook'd schemers straight.
Cudgel thy brains no more, the clinton plots are great.

Mia T, On Neutered and Neutering
by Mia T and Edward Zehr (EZ)


THE CLINTONS--AMERICA'S BIGGEST BLUNDER
Hear Bush 41 Warn Us--October 19, 1992*

hear

*Thanx to Cloud William for text and audio

 

LEHRER: President Bush, your closing statement, sir.

PRESIDENT BUSH: Three weeks from now--two weeks from tomorrow, America goes to the polls and you're going to have to decide who you want to lead this country ...

On foreign affairs, some think it's irrelevant. I believe it's not. We're living in an interconnected world...And if a crisis comes up, ask who has the judgment and the experience and, yes, the character to make the right decision?

And, lastly, the other night on character Governor Clinton said it's not the character of the president but the character of the presidency. I couldn't disagree more. Horace Greeley said the only thing that endures is character. And I think it was Justice Black who talked about great nations, like great men, must keep their word.

And so the question is, who will safeguard this nation, who will safeguard our people and our children? I need your support, I ask for your support. And may God bless the United States of America.

(Applause)

 

play tape

1 posted on 05/29/2003 3:27:31 AM PDT by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Personal Agitprop-and-Money-Laundering Machine,
Cozy-clintonoid-Interviews-of-the-Colmes-Kind-Scheme
Bury
REAL "Living History"

 
   
The REAL "Living History" -- clintoplasmodial slime
 

 
missus clinton's REAL virtual office updateQ ERTY8BUMP

2 posted on 05/29/2003 3:29:01 AM PDT by Mia T (SCUM (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gail Wynand; looscannon; Lonesome in Massachussets; Freedom'sWorthIt; IVote2; Slyfox; Registered; ..
Forsooth! The clintons are rapists
Sid doth protest too much...

Poison Pen Proves Autotoxic:
CLINTON-WAS-AN-UTTER-FAILURE Containment Team Scheme Fails Yet Again

by Mia T, 5.27.03


Democratic Party's Problem Transcends Its Anti-War Contingent
CLINTON-WAS-AN-UTTER-FAILURE Containment Team Scheme FICTIONAL TRILOGY
Q ERTY8PING

The REAL "Living History" -- clintoplasmodial slime


Personal Agitprop-and-Money-Laundering Machine, Cozy-clintonoid-Interviews-of-the-Colmes-Kind-Scheme
Bury
REAL "Living History"

missus clinton's REAL virtual office update

3 posted on 05/29/2003 3:36:40 AM PDT by Mia T (SCUM (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
BTTT
4 posted on 05/29/2003 3:37:52 AM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Good morning Mia
bttt
5 posted on 05/29/2003 4:11:57 AM PDT by firewalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
btt
6 posted on 05/29/2003 4:23:27 AM PDT by The Wizard (Saddamocrats are enemies of America, treasonous everytime they speak)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Let's pray that the evil donkey really is dumb enough to give clinochhio a slot at it's convention. Wouldn't it be great to have him ask for an exemption to the term limit for himself? That'll play real well.
7 posted on 05/29/2003 6:01:33 AM PDT by jmaroneps37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
When Clinton was abusing the Presidency the Democrats introduced legislation to change the constitution and keep him in office. It failed.

Clinton misses the power. He's going to become a real pain in the ass as time goes on.
8 posted on 05/29/2003 6:06:49 AM PDT by gortklattu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37
With the cheers of GO! Big AL/Little Willard GO!...you could hear Shrillarys' DNC handlers murmurs OH!NO! OH!NO!... :)
9 posted on 05/29/2003 6:10:55 AM PDT by skinkinthegrass (Just because you're paranoid,doesn't mean they aren't out to get you. :)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Mia T; conservogirl
NEVER FORGET


Former Gov. CLINTON P/R Manager LARRY NICHOLS was Right !!!


"CLINTON ain't Leaving" = LARRY NICHOLS
http://www.FreeRepublic.com/forum/a396b87fd3478.htm


"CLINTON ain't Leaving" = LARRY NICHOLS 5-Days a week
http://www.FreeRepublic.com/forum/a397785c82702.htm


"CLINTON ain't Leaving" News = LARRY NICHOLS -On the Air- Tonight
http://www.FreeRepublic.com/forum/a3a1c926b480c.htm


NEVER FORGET
10 posted on 05/29/2003 7:48:10 AM PDT by ALOHA RONNIE (Vet-Battle of IA DRANG-1965 www.LZXRAY.com..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Hi, MIaT. Much thanks for the video of Algore's shuffle away from that brave young lady's question about Clinton's rape of Juanita Brodderick. I had forgotten about that incident. It took Algore awhile, didn't it, to come up with the best response (a "religious" one where he forgives Clinton for anything he did wrong in his "personal life" - ignoring the fact that rape is not a "personal life" issue but a CRIME).

America still waits for the evidence in the US Senate office building to be released.

11 posted on 05/29/2003 8:32:17 AM PDT by Freedom'sWorthIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ALOHA RONNIE; Mia T; doug from upland
Great work, Mia. Keep it up.
12 posted on 05/29/2003 10:07:25 AM PDT by Fred Mertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

I agree wholeheartedly that the evidence must be released. Thanks, MiaT, for keeping the Clinton crimes in front of us so we don't forget. The fact that the former president wants the law changed to allow a third term makes me nauseous.
13 posted on 05/29/2003 7:25:51 PM PDT by Faith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

The PoliticsOL.com Daily Briefing

Friday, May 30, 2003

Clinton Wants to Be Prez …Again

Former President Bill Clinton is making it known that if he weren’t prohibited doing so by the 22nd Amendment, he would make another White House bid.

"I think since people are living much longer ... the 22nd Amendment should probably be modified to say two consecutive terms instead of two terms for a lifetime," Clinton told an audience at the John F. Kennedy Presidential Library in Boston on Wednesday.

Last week, when speaking to a class at the University of Arkansas in Little Rock, Clinton told a questioner that had he been permitted, he would have ran for a third term in 2000.

"I would have made you throw me out," he said.

Although Clinton is ineligible to be elected to a third term as president, there is no constitutional prohibition on him reaching the Oval Office again through presidential succession.



14 posted on 05/30/2003 8:27:37 PM PDT by fight_truth_decay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Agree one hundred percent.
We want the sealed evidence released NOW!
Trust me, any sealed evidence on a Pubbie would have been released years a1
15 posted on 05/30/2003 8:33:01 PM PDT by ladyinred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Mia T, Clinton's assumes that "we the people" would just naturally fall on our circa "1993-2000 knee pads all agogging in joy at the prospect of his re-election to a third term if indeed this country were so foolish to amend the Constitution in order to accomodate his delirious notions of self-worth and appeal.

I think he may end up regretting such foolish dreams as "we the people" would surely re-elect President Bush for life over the despicable sex-crazed socialist perjuring self-centered liar, Bill Clinton if the opportunity presents itself.

There is something really wrong with Bill's hyper sense of importance that we just can't go on without his interference in to our lives even though we have ample reason to be leery of his own dysfunctional state of existence.

16 posted on 05/30/2003 8:41:38 PM PDT by harpo11 (Godspeed Brave USA Troops! My Families Thoughts and Prayers are Being Sent to YOU! "Job Well Done!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson