Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TLBSHOW
"Given the awareness of the terrorist use of planes as weapons, how was it that NORAD was ... not better prepared to protect against the hijacking of commercial jets?"

Given that President George W. Bush was in office 7 1/2 months at the time of the attack, and that most of the 2nd and 3rd tier officials were not yet confirmed, Ben-Veniste should address his question to the appropriate Clinton Administration hacks.

As for some victims' family members looking to pin something on President Bush, why is that surprising? The New York metro area is very heavily Democrat in political persuasion. It is not at all surprising that at least some family members would look to make partisan political hay out of the atrocity. For some, it would be a twofer: grinding their particular political axe, and salivating over the possibility that they could sue the government for mega-millions.

14 posted on 05/24/2003 6:35:21 PM PDT by Wolfstar (If we don't re-elect this truly great President, we're NUTS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Wolfstar
Wasn't this the FIRST time they wased planes as weapons, before they would hijack, but NEVER plow into a building!!!!
21 posted on 05/24/2003 6:50:36 PM PDT by Jewels1091
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson