Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Another prime example of the impartial, fair and balanced objectivity of the reporting staff of The New York Times!
1 posted on 05/22/2003 8:03:42 PM PDT by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: martin_fierro; reformed_democrat; Loyalist; =Intervention=; PianoMan; GOPJ; Miss Marple; Tamsey; ...

EXTRA SPECIAL New York Times mega-biased reporter alert!


Schadenfreude

This is the New York Times Schadenfreude Ping List. Freepmail me to be added or dropped.


2 posted on 05/22/2003 8:04:59 PM PDT by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Timesink
This person likes to use the words comradship, and collective. You know, it sounds sort of communist to me.
4 posted on 05/22/2003 8:11:57 PM PDT by ditto h
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Timesink
Hedges, author of "War Is a Force That Gives Us Meaning," said he was disturbed by the hostile reaction. "Watching it in my own country is heartbreaking."

Now he knows how a majority of American's must have felt watching the war protestors equating President Bush to Hitler and suggesting solders turn against their commanders.
7 posted on 05/22/2003 8:19:08 PM PDT by Gkubly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Timesink
These poor, pathetic people have such a hard time understanding what freedom of speech is all about. I'd be willing to bet that not one of them has ever bothered to read either the Constitution or the Federalists Papers. Such ignorance is stunning.
8 posted on 05/22/2003 8:19:11 PM PDT by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Timesink
Following our defeat in Vietnam we became a better nation.

This is the first time I have heard a liberal come out and say this so bluntly, though it has definitely been the subtext to a whole lot of liberal rhetoric for ages.

No wonder they fight against their own country, even in time of war. They believe our defeats make us better.

11 posted on 05/22/2003 8:29:32 PM PDT by Snuffington
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Timesink
The Rockford Register Star has audio and VIDEO (!) of the event.
13 posted on 05/22/2003 8:32:18 PM PDT by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty" not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: *Salon Deathwatch; Drango
To find all articles tagged or indexed using Salon Deathwatch, click below:
  click here >>> Salon Deathwatch <<< click here  
(To view all FR Bump Lists, click here)

15 posted on 05/22/2003 8:36:59 PM PDT by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Timesink
Hey Chris Hedges, here's my commment: booooooooooo booooooooo boooooo boooooooooo booooooo
16 posted on 05/22/2003 8:42:08 PM PDT by GOPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Timesink
Hey Chris Hedges, here's my commment: booooooooooo booooooooo boooooo boooooooooo booooooo
17 posted on 05/22/2003 8:42:10 PM PDT by GOPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Timesink
"NYT Reporter" + "Anti-War Activist"? And The NYT has no problem with this? I guess I'm just not "tolerant" enough.
19 posted on 05/22/2003 9:06:18 PM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Timesink
A few days ago I was looking around to see if I could find some stuff out about Hedges and I came across this interview he gave to a leftwing online magazine called Dangerous Citizen. I think Hedges' own words about his father's reputation in the little town he grew up in tell us all we need to know about why filius Hedges gets off riling the natives:
Hedges: My father, who had fought in World War II, essentially became a pacifist after the war. He was a very early opponent of the Vietnam War and took us as children to antiwar demonstrations. He told me when I was about 12 that, if the war was still going when I was 18 and I was drafted, he would go to prison with me. If we visited museums, he would never allow us to see the displays of weapons and guns. He couldn't stand the VFW hall, partly because they drank so much there. And, of course, I grew up in a manse, where there was no alcohol. I remember one July Fourth parade when I was about ten, and these guys were going by in their caps. And he said, "Never forget. Most of those guys were in the back, fixing the trucks." So I grew up in a home where war was seen for the abomination that it was.

On the other hand, I also grew up in a home with parents who were social activists, so my entire childhood was colored by the civil rights movement, the antiwar movement. When my father died in 1995, he was very involved in the gay rights movement. And I learned, because we lived in a small town in upstate New York, the cost of taking a moral stand -- that it was unpopular. I mean, Martin Luther King, in the early days of the civil rights movement, was one of the hated men in America. I felt the sting of what it meant to stand up for what you believe in or to support a cause that was just and, certainly at its inception, how difficult that was.

That developed, I think, a lot of anger in me -- anger at seeing my father, whom I admired, belittled by people in our town. I also read a lot as a teenager about the Holocaust and the Spanish Civil War, and I very much wanted that epic battle to define my own life. I used to regret as a teenager that I had not been of age in the thirties, that I couldn't go fight fascism like my hero George Orwell. By the time I was a divinity student, the military dictatorships in Latin America were carrying out horrendous crimes -- the "dirty war" in Argentina, Pinochet in Chile, the civil war in El Salvador. When I got to El Salvador, the death squads were killing 800 to 1,000 people a month, and I felt that, as a young man, this was as close as my generation was going to come to fighting fascism. And that is what propelled me toward war -- not because I was any kind of a gun nut, not because I came as a voyeur -- which some people do -- but out of a sense of justice, out of a sense of idealism.

Belittle my father will you? Take my sneers then --- from my exalted commencement speaker's podium.

Also I saw Hedges on The PBS Newshour last December, and on Charlie Rose at about the same time. Rarely have I seen so bitter and tortured a man, or a man with more of a distorted idea about the worthiness of his own parochial and banal observations about the human condition. In a letter I wrote at the time I said, "Yesterday [Terrence Smith] groveled before a sniveling coward, Chris Hedges, allowing the audience to go away with the impression that Hedges's pathological case of self-hatred and anti-Americanism was somehow useful in illustrating the real moral questions that arise when grave issues of war and peace are discussed."

Hedges is a psychological case; a guy with severe psychologcal problems who, it so happens, can also write fairly well. That The New York Times has him on its payroll along with, until just a few days ago, psychological basketcase Jayson Blair, tells us something about the "paper of record" which I'm sure Howell Raines never intended.

22 posted on 05/22/2003 9:13:53 PM PDT by beckett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Timesink
Their university dishonored these students when they selected a divisive and out-of-step speaker, and allowed him to dominate their commencement with his untempered political opinions. That is very true.

However, they were rude. I can stand politely for a few minutes and listen to an opinion contrary to mine. That is something we should still expect of one another, and especially of young people. "The liberals have been shutting us up, so it's their turn" does not justify uncivilized behavior in my opinion. Conservatives (and moderates) should rise above it, not stoop to it.

This doofus with his idealogical Tourette's Syndrome is actually not to blame for this contratemps. Don't blame the horse who urinates in the chapel--blame the ignoramus who rode the horse into church. Such an undistinguished, insensitive boor of a speaker--there is no question that his presence at the microphone was a slap in the face of the graduates. He didn't even give a nod to the context of his role in their ceremony--instead, like Michael Moore, he had to try to highjack it to make his point.

Theirs, however, could have been the better part: to behave with stony dignity, and protest by sitting quietly on their hands.
25 posted on 05/22/2003 9:26:02 PM PDT by ChemistCat (Disney won't see another cent of our money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Timesink
I would have loved to have seen the student body moon this jerk en mass...
28 posted on 05/22/2003 9:39:41 PM PDT by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Timesink
when the Israelis invaded southern Lebanon in 1982, they were greeted by the dispossessed Shiites as liberators. But within a few months, when the Shiites saw that the Israelis had come not as liberators but occupiers, they began to kill them

Lebanon has many religious groups, including large numbers of Christians and Druges (?SP). Israel invaded lebanon to protect Israeli citizens in Gallilee from being killed from terrorists based in south lebanon. And the "Shiites" who "hated" Israel are Iranian funded islamofascists, and the Syrians essentially run the country (which is why so may Christian lebanese are now European or American citizens.

this is "blame the Jews" anti semitism...

39 posted on 05/23/2003 4:48:53 AM PDT by LadyDoc (liberals only love politically correct poor people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Timesink
I will not attempt to deconstruct this commencement speech, as it is too long and some of you have done so already. There is ignorance of history, anti-Americanism, and anti-Semitism throughout. A friend sent me the audio of this speech and to listen to this is jaw dropping. The arrogance comes through immediately – listen to what I have to say you rabble – and it is a lecture, not a speech. What is interesting, at the conclusion, while the microphone is still on, you hear Hedges berating the college president. You have to turn up your speaker to hear this but you can hear it.

What I want to discuss is his last statement, which is –

Think finally of what it means to die for a friend. It is deliberate and painful; there is no ecstasy. For friends, dying is hard and bitter. The dialogue they have and cherish will perhaps never be re-created. Friends do not, the way comrades do, love death and sacrifice. To friends, the prospect of death is frightening. And this is why friendship -- or, let me say, love -- is the most potent enemy of war. Thank you.

Now, contrast his belief with this –

12"This is My commandment, that you love one another, just as I have loved you. 13Greater love has no one than this, that one lay down his life for his friends. 14You are My friends if you do what I command you.” – John 15:12-14.

His last statement turns the word of Jesus on its head. For a divinity student, he seems not to understand Gods word. Perhaps he spent too much time reading Communist propaganda and not enough time learning the word of God.

To the poster stating we should politely listen to people we disagree with. Let me see – this guy Hedges trashed America, the current administration, the Jewish people of Israel, the American military, the military personnel, and concludes by contradicting God. I should stand quietly by and listen to all of this?! I agree with the other poster who said no more! What is it that posters on FR always say – never bring a knife to a gunfight! When you attempt to argue or fight with two sets of rules, if you continue to stick to your rules and expect your opponent to do the same, you will always lose. If someone is in the gutter throwing muck at you, you cannot stop that person unless you get in the gutter. You can always come back up from the gutter but those types of people never can rise above their allotted station in life.

44 posted on 05/23/2003 5:46:11 AM PDT by 7thson (I think it takes a big dog to weigh a 100 pounds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Timesink
Because we no longer understand war, we no longer understand that it can all go horribly wrong. We no longer understand that war begins by calling for the annihilation of others but ends if we do not know when to make or maintain peace with self-annihilation. We flirt, given the potency of modern weapons, with our own destruction.

These are precisely the words Osama could use when he finally capitulates.

46 posted on 05/23/2003 5:55:09 AM PDT by wayoverontheright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson