Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Attorney: Justice was 'stained' by article (more on Sweeney v. NYT)
Cleveland Plain Dealer/AP ^ | 5/22/03 | M.R. Kropko

Posted on 05/22/2003 5:04:47 PM PDT by martin_fierro

CLEVELAND (AP) -- The New York Times and one of its reporters "stained" an Ohio Supreme Court justice by wrongly linking him to the prosecution of Dr. Sam Sheppard, a lawyer told jurors Thursday in a defamation lawsuit.

Justice Francis E. Sweeney accused the newspaper and reporter Fox Butterfield of defaming him in an article published April 13, 2000.

Sweeney said the article incorrectly connected him to the prosecution of the case and also accused him of pressuring prosecutors to oppose a civil action led by Sheppard's son, who was trying to have his father declared innocent.

The justice says he was an assistant prosecutor in Cuyahoga County in the 1960s assigned to juvenile cases and had no role in the retrial of Dr. Sheppard.

Newspaper attorney James Wooley has said any errors were unintentional and without malice. The Times ran a correction.

To win the lawsuit, Sweeney's lawyer, Don Iler, must prove that Butterfield's article involved malice.

"Actual malice seems like a very difficult burden, but in this case it was not," Iler told the jury Thursday. "He (Butterfield) and The New York Times besmirched Justice Sweeney and stained him for the rest of his life. No one ever said Justice Sweeney put pressure on anyone, no one except Sam Reese Sheppard on the day he lost his case."

The lawsuit, which was filed in October 2000, seeks unspecified damages. The defense was to give final arguments Thursday afternoon.

"If it comes from Fox Butterfield, it's got to be right. So, let it go. That's what The New York Times decided," Iler said Thursday.

"You can't make mistakes about people and get away with it," he said. "This man (Butterfield) was not a cub reporter for some high school newspaper."

The Times article primarily involved a Cuyahoga County jury's ruling against Sam Reese Sheppard's lawsuit to have his father formally declared innocent, a requirement for a claim against Ohio for wrongful imprisonment.

Dr. Sheppard was convicted in the July 4, 1954, beating death of his wife, Marilyn. His conviction was overturned on appeal, and he was acquitted at a retrial in 1966. He died four years later.

Sheppard always maintained his innocence, and his story helped inspire the movie and television series "The Fugitive."

Butterfield testified that he wrote his article based on information he believed to be correct. He identified his key sources as Sam Reese Sheppard and his lawyer, Terry Gilbert.

"I regret the mistake. We made the mistake about what his exact role was in the prosecutor's office, and I'm very sorry about that," Butterfield testified during the trial.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; US: Ohio
KEYWORDS: cleveland; defamation; falsification; fleebailey; howellraines; jaysonblair; lawsuit; mediafraud; medialies; newyorktimes; nyt; ohio; plagiarism; samsheppard; sweeney; thenewyorktimes

Sweeney (l), Butterfield (r)

1 posted on 05/22/2003 5:04:49 PM PDT by martin_fierro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Timesink; Liz
Schadenfreude ping
2 posted on 05/22/2003 5:05:13 PM PDT by martin_fierro (A v v n c v l v s M a x i m v s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Previous story:

Ohio Justice Sues N.Y. Times Over Story (Timesman wrote untruths about Justice Sweeney)

3 posted on 05/22/2003 5:07:57 PM PDT by martin_fierro (A v v n c v l v s M a x i m v s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro
Excellent timing for nailing the NY Slimes.
4 posted on 05/22/2003 5:24:26 PM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro; reformed_democrat; Loyalist; =Intervention=; PianoMan; GOPJ; Miss Marple; Tamsey; ...

Schadenfreude

This is the New York Times Schadenfreude Ping List. Freepmail me to be added or dropped.


5 posted on 05/22/2003 6:35:42 PM PDT by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro; reformed_democrat; Loyalist; =Intervention=; PianoMan; GOPJ; Miss Marple; Tamsey; ...
This is not the first time Fox Butterfield has been in trouble at The New York Times. He got nailed for plagiarism back in 1991. The Times gave him a whopping one-week suspension.
6 posted on 05/22/2003 6:38:24 PM PDT by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro
At the rate things are going, people are going to be "stained" just by having their name mentioned anywhere in the New York Times, regardless of the context.
7 posted on 05/22/2003 6:39:18 PM PDT by LanPB01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro
Butterfield says it was an honest mistake.

Apparently he accepted Shepherd's accusation and never did any fact checking to see it it was accurate.

I don't consider that professional behavior.
8 posted on 05/22/2003 6:52:48 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
The NYT-pukes need a refresher course: Ethics 101.
9 posted on 05/22/2003 7:49:41 PM PDT by Ciexyz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
The NYT-pukes need a refresher course: Ethics 101.
10 posted on 05/22/2003 7:49:51 PM PDT by Ciexyz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson