[pittsburgh gop guy]

To read the actual poll results (lengthy), click on the link (http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x6162.xml).

This is good news for Rick, and W too!

[lilylangtree]

Great news for the Repubs--Santorum and W. Salute to Pennsylvanians.

[Mind-numbed Robot]

All of that was a tempest in a teapot anyway. The left and their media friends tried to drum Santorum out just as they did Trent Lott. It works too many times. Of course, Lott had no gut but Santorum stood his ground as he should have. They totally distorted what he said.

[GraniteStateConservative]

Lieberman's poor fundraising not withstanding, he could rack up nice primary wins in states like NY and PA and make the race for the nominee competitive.

"Lieberman-- for people who want to vote for Bush but don't think he's Jewish enough"

[CatoRenasci]

Voters say 58 - 27 percent that homosexual behavior is morally wrong, the independent Quinnipiac (KWIN uh-pe-ack) University poll finds. But voters say 45 -- 35 percent that homosexual relations between consenting adults should be legal.

Conservatives should note these numbers well, to understand what can and cannot be accomplished. If you want to discourage homosexuality -- which I do -- it is important to differentiate between what is legal and what is moral. It is quite possible to believe something is wrong, without believing the state should criminalize it. And, that seems to be where a substantial number of people come out. If you don't want to elect Democrats and have homosexual marriage shoved down your throat, don't talk about legislation, talk about morality: be content to leave people alone in their bedrooms, while making your moral objections clear. Love the sinner, hate the sin.

[LS]

Folks, do you realize that in the last week we have had polls in MASS showing Bush would defeat even Kerry; in NY showing Bush would beat anyone; in PA showing Bush beating anyone; and in CA showing Bush gaining unexpected support among Hispanics.

Now, where are those guys who said Bush would be "just like his daddy?"

Who'se YOUR Daddy?

[mabelkitty]

Earth round, sky blue.

No kidding.

Where are all the lib detractors who SWORE this would kill the party??

[Republican Wildcat]

It appears Santorum lost none of the support he began with...still at 55% approval.

However, folks, these polls about President Bush are at this point worthless--let's not get excited over them. If they say this at the end of October, then we can get excited.

[Republican Wildcat]

It appears Santorum lost none of the support he began with...still at 55% approval.

However, folks, these polls about President Bush are at this point worthless--let's not get excited over them. If they say this at the end of October (2004), then we can get excited.

[canuck_conservative]

".... 30 percent say they feel "less favorably" about him because of his comments about homosexual activity. But a majority say in response to both questions his comments make no difference in .... how they feel."

Yup, that makes real sense.

Yeah. Uh-huh. Sure.

[GOPJ]

bump

[cgk]

It's good news for now. Wait until 2004 and the Teamsters Machine charges into action with their strong-armed tactics in "getting out the vote" by bashing people's heads in, ripping signs off their personal property, and handing out detailed pamplets complete with pictures on election site steps on "How to pull the Democratic lever".

As for Santorum's remarks - he NEVER SAID THE WORD GAY! The reporter kindly inserted that word for him. Again, that reporter is a Dem, married to a Dem, who is a member of Kerry's campaign. I wonder when people are going to connect the dots.

(speaking out loud to the article, not you pitts.) ;)

[smith288]

I caught a Daily Show rerun (that show has went from sorta neutral to extreme-left lately) and they did make me laugh.

The one "correspondant" said after watching the democrat debate, he can report at that time, with 0 percent precincts reporting, Bush is the projected winner for President of the United States for 2004.

I was cracking up with that.

[The Old Hoosier]

"The Senator's comments caused an uproar nationally, but not back home."

Correction: "The Senator's comments caused an uproar among members of the overwhelmingly left-wing, homosexual Washington media elite, but not back home."