Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gdani
In principle, for all. I'm not sure what other manner of organizations (beyond the ones listed on this thread) fall under each category, but it's easy to see that my priest should be able to go to the pulpit and tell the congregation that they should not vote for John Edwards because he supports abortion.
47 posted on 05/20/2003 9:11:16 AM PDT by JohnnyZ (That's my theory and I'm sticking to it! At least for the present . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]


To: JohnnyZ
In principle, for all. I'm not sure what other manner of organizations (beyond the ones listed on this thread) fall under each category, but it's easy to see that my priest should be able to go to the pulpit and tell the congregation that they should not vote for John Edwards because he supports abortion.

Then you should tell your priest to either deregister as a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization or to register as a 501(c)(4) & pay some taxes. It really is that simple.

It's what every single other non-profit organization that wants to involve themselves in the political process has done --- and it doesn't require passing any new laws.

However, if the bill was amended to include all 501(c)(3) orgs, it would mean that the ACLU, People for the American Way, Planned Parenthood, etc could all lobby, endorse, etc without paying any taxes. That would be the consequence of extending the bill to everyone.

As it is now, non-profit churches are treated exactly the same way as everyone else under these laws -- isn't that what people always say they want? -- for churches to be treated the same as everyone else?

50 posted on 05/20/2003 9:24:23 AM PDT by gdani
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson