Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Journalist's Hard Fall (Newsweek: Jayson Blair in "Hospital Setting Dealing w/ Personal Problems"
Newsweek ^ | May 19, 2003 | Seth Mnookin

Posted on 05/11/2003 2:17:04 PM PDT by Timesink

A Journalist’s Hard Fall

The New York Times confronts an embarrassing trail of deceit—and difficult questions about its own culture

[...]

But there's plenty that the Times report, which ran under the rubric CORRECTING THE RECORD, didn't fully explore, namely how a troubled young reporter whose short career was rife with problems was able to advance so quickly. Internally, reporters had wondered for years whether Blair was given so many chances - and whether he was hired in the first place - because he was a promising, if unpolished, black reporter on a staff that continues to be, like most newsrooms in the country, mostly white. The Times also didn't address an uncomfortable but unavoidable topic that has been broached with some of the paper's top editors during the past week: by favoring Blair, did the Times end up reinforcing some of the worst suspicions about the pitfalls of affirmative action? And will there be fewer opportunities for young minority reporters in the future?

"We have, generally, a horribly undiverse staff," says one Times staffer. "And so we hold up and promote the few black staffers we have." That's a point other news outlets have made since Blair resigned. Executive editor Howell Raines, who declined repeated requests for an inter-view with NEWSWEEK, told NPR, when pressed about whether Blair was pushed along because of his race, "No, I do not see it as illustrating that point. I see it as illustrating a tragedy for Jayson Blair." (Blair, whose voice mail at the Times was still active as of Saturday evening, did not respond to a message left there or on his cell phone; several sources at the Times say he is currently in a hospital setting dealing with personal problems.)

[...]

Questions about Raines's management style - his penchant for giving preferential treatment to favored stars, his celebrated fondness for "flooding the zone" on big stories, severely stretching resources - weren't addressed at all. Indeed, more than one Times staffer pointed out that the paper's national staff would not have been in need of the services of an untested young reporter with a spotty track record had a number of veterans not been pushed out by Raines last year.

[...]


(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: blair; ccrm; corrupt; ethics; falsification; howellraines; jaysonblair; journalists; lamestreammedia; liar; newyorktimes; nyt; plagiarism; presstitutes; thenewyorktimes; unethical
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last
Vast majority of the article has been cut under the LAT/WP agreement, of course. The above are the juciest grafs, IMHO, but you ought to read the whole thing. Note well that Howell Raines, directly or indirectly, has a lot more to do with this mess than you would think.)

And you do have to ask yourself the question: In the long run, the dismissal of which of the following two men would be in the best interest of The New York Times?

IMG: Jayson Blair and Howell Raines

1 posted on 05/11/2003 2:17:04 PM PDT by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Um ... anyone know why that second highlighted sentence turned green instead of red?
2 posted on 05/11/2003 2:18:07 PM PDT by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
I'm waiting for the lawsuit that Blair files against the NYT because they didn't stop him. Everyone knows nobody is responsible for anything on their own, unless they're conservatives, in which case they're responsible for everything bad that happens.
3 posted on 05/11/2003 2:19:37 PM PDT by John Jorsett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
I have no idea.
4 posted on 05/11/2003 2:20:16 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
Um ... anyone know why that second highlighted sentence turned green instead of red?

Looks fine to me. But then, I'm color blind.

5 posted on 05/11/2003 2:20:32 PM PDT by John Jorsett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: *CCRM; *Lamestream Media; *Presstitutes; MEDIANEWS; martin_fierro; reformed_democrat
This is the New York Times Schadenfreude Ping List. Freepmail me to be added or dropped.
6 posted on 05/11/2003 2:20:37 PM PDT by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
Maybe I should rephrase: Are both highlighted sentences in red for everyone except those using Safari as their browser? Seems like every bug I have these days is a Safari bug.
7 posted on 05/11/2003 2:21:59 PM PDT by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
Dealing w/ Personal Problems

This must be what journalists do...
Politicians who screw up quit "to spend more time with their families..."

8 posted on 05/11/2003 2:21:59 PM PDT by Tijeras_Slim (There's fast.... and then there's Slim fast....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
He's dealing with personal problems alright--he got caught!
9 posted on 05/11/2003 2:22:01 PM PDT by freeangel (freeangel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
The second sentence is definitely in green on my IE browser.
10 posted on 05/11/2003 2:23:34 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
In honor of St. Patrick?
11 posted on 05/11/2003 2:24:04 PM PDT by Faraday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
No, I get the second highlighted sentence in green in IE. I think it might have been a mistake in the HTML. The green sentence's tag reads: FONT color=#0ed0
12 posted on 05/11/2003 2:25:11 PM PDT by The Hon. Galahad Threepwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
Good point. No one would miss Raines. But Raines simply expresses the will of the publisher Pinch Sulzberger who is a lot more leftist than his pappy. He would just put another extreme liberal mope similar to Raines in charge.
13 posted on 05/11/2003 2:25:17 PM PDT by driftless ( For life-long happiness, learn how to play the accordion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
I knew in my heart he was gonna turn out to be the victim.

He was turned into a dirty rotten lying cheat by the New York Times.

14 posted on 05/11/2003 2:26:18 PM PDT by DainBramage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
It also shows up in green on Netscape 7.01.
15 posted on 05/11/2003 2:27:41 PM PDT by The Hon. Galahad Threepwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: DainBramage
I knew in my heart he was gonna turn out to be the victim. He was turned into a dirty rotten lying cheat by the New York Times.

Oh no he wasn't. Go look back on some of the earlier FR threads on this matter. He was doing the same thing at his college newspaper.

16 posted on 05/11/2003 2:29:34 PM PDT by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
Several sources at the Times say he is currently in a hospital setting dealing with personal problems.

Why can't they just say he's in detox?

17 posted on 05/11/2003 2:29:41 PM PDT by Loyalist (Can you hear me now, Adrienne?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
Has anything been said about Mr. Blair's sexual orientation or gender status? Clearly, WP/Newsweek is trying to hold this "brother" to a white, male, imperialist standard of "objectivity." And why should he be the only one? And why was Adam Clymer allowed to resign? Ahh...the NYT is becoming a real source of entertainment.
18 posted on 05/11/2003 2:30:22 PM PDT by Faraday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
Indeed, more than one Times staffer pointed out that the paper's national staff would not have been in need of the services of an untested young reporter with a spotty track record had a number of veterans not been pushed out by Raines last year.

If Pinch Sulzberger were not so mesmerized by Howell Raines' zipper, Raines would already be history. Raines has proven to be the WORST editor in the history of journalism but because he has Pinch Sulzberger in hypnotic awe of him, Raines probably won't be fired.

19 posted on 05/11/2003 2:32:03 PM PDT by PJ-Comix (A Person With No Sense Of Humor Is Someone Who Confuses The Irreverent With The Irrelevant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
Additional question. I have always understood that NYT has a preponderence of homosexual reporters and staff. Yes, this reporter may be black, but I wonder whetther his real affirmative action is in his sexual preference????


What is Mr. Raines sexual orientation??
20 posted on 05/11/2003 2:32:05 PM PDT by mlmr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson