Skip to comments.
Eau Claire TV 13 Poll: Bush Jet Landing
WEAU TV 13 ^
| 5/8/2003
| WEAU TV 13
Posted on 05/08/2003 11:35:48 AM PDT by quietolong
Bush Jet Landing
What do you think of Bush's jet landing?
A waste of taxpayer money
A political move
An appropriate act
Link to Poll
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; US: Wisconsin
KEYWORDS: bush; jetlanding
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
Yes I know That Bush did not Land the aircraft.
He is C&C that right there make it An appropriate act
The only bad thing was. Giveing all the troops on board. The extra work. After a long deployment getting the ship shipshape.
Ill bet all the chiefs & Zeros were freaking when they heard the C&C was coming. Flight deck scrub down, uniform inspections, aircraft washing & so on. Some thing never change. ( but on the other hand I keep hearing all about the Hi-Tech Navy those computerized buffers & mops must be neat! and no Sailors power needed ;)
LOL What they should be asking is how much extra the Navy spend on paint & Jerseys ;)
To: quietolong
Freeped and bumped
To: RooRoobird14
done and bumped
To: quietolong
I always looked forward to the Admiral visiting my submarine. I may have had to scrub the sub a bit more but I knew that I would be getting steak and lobster and ice cream sundaes for lunch or dinner.
4
posted on
05/08/2003 11:41:41 AM PDT
by
montomike
To: montomike
What a rip off we never got steak and lobster after the Admiral visited our Squadron ;)
To: quietolong
I was actually suprised that the sailors on the Lincoln were not required to be in dress uniforms for the speach, they were all in dungarees and khakis. As far as polishing the ship goes, the Lincoln has a reputation for being fanatic about keeping the ship spotless, they didn't do much out of the ordinary.
6
posted on
05/08/2003 11:52:53 AM PDT
by
hornetguy
To: quietolong
freeped and bumped
7
posted on
05/08/2003 12:00:23 PM PDT
by
Endeavor
To: hornetguy
You know what the tough part was?The media and the cables snaking all over.It was like herding cats! I heard the Navy officer say combat was easier because everyone knew his job and followed orders(paraphrased)!
8
posted on
05/08/2003 12:00:27 PM PDT
by
MEG33
To: quietolong
Done
To: quietolong
I doubt seriously that there was a huge "field day".
For this ship to be at sea for over 10 months was enough.
I believe the captain and officers did not enforce any additional details other than regular work day duties.
10
posted on
05/08/2003 12:17:34 PM PDT
by
DD938
(God Bless America & Great Britian ( an old Navy veteran))
To: quietolong
I doubt seriously that there was a huge "field day".
For this ship to be at sea for over 10 months was enough.
I believe the captain and officers did not enforce any additional details other than regular work day duties.
11
posted on
05/08/2003 12:21:36 PM PDT
by
DD938
(Bring an old sailor home for Sunday dinner.......maybe meet your sister)
To: quietolong
Cost less than Bubbas Starr investigations for having raped and "cigared" so many young girls.
Cost less than stopping traffic at LAX so Bubba get get a haircut by Christophe.
12
posted on
05/08/2003 12:58:11 PM PDT
by
Kay Soze
(France helped Osama Bin Laden kill 3,000 US citizens in New York on Sept 11,2001.)
To: quietolong
I wonder how much securing the area, the airspace, and the motorcade route was, seeing as the area wasn't secured before, and the parkinglot had all those cars in it.
13
posted on
05/08/2003 1:03:11 PM PDT
by
lepton
To: quietolong
democrats don`t fly,bump.
To: MEG33
LOL
True
To: hornetguy; DD938
Ships aircraft & uniforms do not look that clean after 10 months at sea.
Even with the C&C coming on board this still needed to be a working flightdeck. When have you ever seen that many clean & new flightdeck Jerseys at one time. Ive had dungarees inspections already. Its not what you normally wear to work.
After over 10 years in the Navy I dont think the cleaning part has changed. All the E-1, 2 & 3s were scrubbing away.
To: quietolong
Actually it only happened once. I'll always remember it.
To: quietolong
Well, they didn't care, so why should you? The event highlighted the record they set, they got a chance to not be anonymous. It was a great tribute to them, and if Bush's re-election is kickstarted by it, too bad for the puny Democrats.
To: quietolong
Consider it FReeped, QTL.
Interesting to note that whoever wrote the poll is probably on our side:
What do you think of Bush's jet landing?
A waste of taxpayer money
A political move
An appropriate act
They split the negative responses by providing two negative options, while anyone who views the president's actions positively will call it an appropriate act.
19
posted on
05/08/2003 3:18:35 PM PDT
by
LouD
To: quietolong
Those interested in this general subject, and the foolishness of the Democrat attacks on the President over his speech on the USS Abraham Lincoln, will appreciate my latest column on that very subject. The link below goes to the article on my own website. It is also on FR. It may be later published on UPI.
Congressman Billybob
Latest column, now up on FR, "Brave New Moment."
20
posted on
05/08/2003 4:38:08 PM PDT
by
Congressman Billybob
("Saddam has left the building. Heck, the building has left the building.")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson