Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: talleyman
The only French that helped us was LaFeyettes Fleet in the York River,a few shipments of Charlevilles (older model 1763's then later in the war 1777 AN IX Corrige' Charlevilles - I have one) equalling about 75,000 muskets. A few ground troops to train Militia (scenes from the Patriot - Most of the training was done by Von Stueben).
True, we needed the "edge" from the french to get us over, but we could have done it with out them. The war would have taken longer, but we would have won anyway.
5 posted on 05/06/2003 12:16:17 PM PDT by Zavien Doombringer (If I keep my eyes on Jesus, I could walk on water - Audio Adrenaline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Zavien Doombringer
Yes....and they only helped us because helping us was a poke in the English Eye.

Had we been fighting for independence from any country other than England, the French would not have helped.

7 posted on 05/06/2003 12:23:31 PM PDT by Psycho_Bunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Zavien Doombringer
There were several thousand French troops with us at the Battle of Yorktown.
8 posted on 05/06/2003 12:23:48 PM PDT by lepton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Zavien Doombringer
It wasn't Lafayette's fleet, it was Admiral de Grasse's fleet that kept the British bottled up and out of the mouth of the York River. Lafayette was really no more than adviser and close confidant of Washington's. General Rochambeau, however, had a fairly large French contingent, forming the left flank at the final battle (Washington's troops formed the right).

True, we needed the "edge" from the french to get us over, but we could have done it with out them. The war would have taken longer, but we would have won anyway.

Now, don't let your current passions cloud history. Fact is, if de Grasse had not bottled up the English, the Americans would have had to deal with the English fleet (under Adm. Thomas Graves), and the English soldiers would have had an escape, and a chance to live and fight another day.

Fact is, we could NOT have done it without the French.

19 posted on 05/06/2003 12:45:47 PM PDT by Cacophonous
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Zavien Doombringer
Faulty History, dude.

Rochambeau had a hell of a lot more men on the ground than Washington. The French Fleet under de Grasse intercepted the British Fleet and whipped them on the way to relieve Yorktown.

A typical revolutionary soldier in the later years of the war carried a French Musket, Shot, and Powder. Wore a uniform made in France, including boots and a newfangled invention called socks, ate French rations, carried his French overcoat and blanket in a French knapsack, and was backed up by French artillery. If he got wounded, he was treated with a French medical kit (no thanks!) and French medicines.

The trouble we were giving Britain was definitely worth the money to our Froggie Friends. Von Steuben was definitely a help too, in that he made us ready to accept professional help from the French. But that doesn't mean we should sell the French connection short. We woulda lost big time without their help, regardless of their motives.

30 posted on 05/06/2003 2:13:00 PM PDT by Kenny Bunk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson