Regards, Ivan
Posted on 05/04/2003 2:59:42 PM PDT by MadIvan
COLIN POWELL, the American Secretary of State, issued a veiled threat to Syria yesterday when he said that Damascus could expect consequences if it did not co-operate with the United States and help to rebuild Iraq.
General Powell, who met President Assad in Damascus on Saturday, said that the US Administration was monitoring Syria’s moves.
“What I said to him is that we would be watching and we would measure performance over time to see whether Syria is prepared now to move in a new direction in light of these changed circumstances,” he told ABC television.
The key to whether Syria appears to be co-operating will be whether it keeps its eastern border closed and hands over any Iraqi suspects who might cross it to escape prosecution.
“If Syria follows through on those steps and co-operates with rebuilding Iraq, including the formation of a democratic government,” General Powell said, “then that tells us that they are looking for a better relationship with United States. If they do not, then there will be consequences.”
There was already signs of progress as analysts said that the offices of Hamas, Islamic Jihad and the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine General Command may soon close down, despite denials by the groups.
General Powell said that there were many ways to confront a country, including diplomatic, political, economic and military ones. “The President has all of his options on the table,” he said.
However, General Powell and Donald Rumsfeld, the US Defence Secretary, were more reticent on the search for weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Both played down expectations of an early discovery of biological, chemical or nuclear weapons in Iraq, while insisting that they would be found.
Coalition forces have captured several potential witnesses to Saddam Hussein’s arms programmes, but apparently so far none has co-operated with his interrogators. Mr Rumsfeld said that the United States would have to rely on low-ranking Iraqi officials from Saddam’s regime to disclose the existence of banned weapons.
He held out little hope that the weapons would be found independently. “We’re going to find what we find as a result of talking to people, not simply by going to some site and hoping to discover it,” he said.
On the fate of Saddam, Mr Rumsfeld said that most importantly he was out of power and no longer a threat.“If I had to guess, I would suspect that (Saddam) may very well be alive,” he said.
Most American voters are not pushing for proof of the banned weapons, focusing instead on economic concerns ahead of the presidential elections in November next year, but a failure to find any weapons could be exploited by Democrats in the months ahead.
However, the search for banned weapons should get a boost from an American plan to hand the peacekeeping and humanitarian mission in Iraq to an international force. At first, at least, it will augment rather than replace the 135,000-strong US military force in Iraq, one of whose chief goals is to find and destroy weapons.
Responsibilities are to be split across three zones, with the United States, Britain and Poland each controlling a section. The United States will commit a single division of 20,000 troops to its sector.
Italy, Spain, Ukraine, Denmark, the Netherlands and Bulgaria have committed troops to serve in the other sectors and other countries have offered logistical support.
Mr Bush hopes that changes in Iraq and efforts to build a more democratic Palestinian leadership will act as an incentive to other Middle Eastern states, especially Iran and Syria. He has launched a “road map” to an Israeli-Palestinian peace pact, which will require their co-operation in stemming support for Palestinian and Islamic militants.
Regards, Ivan
Is this a normal salutation for a Secertary of State in the UK or are they referring to Colin Powell's previous function.
Certainly nothing wrong with the message or the tone. Now, Assad's got to sell it to the nuts that he has to deal with.
Do you see 'neocons' in your sleep? There's medication for that, you know.
.... (and vilified and ridiculed on this very website) the same way the French, Russians, and Germans are now.
Do you not think the French, Russians, and Germans deserve ridicule and vilification?
Yes, it is traditional for upper-level military officers to retain their military titles even when retired. I think the tradition is breaking down some, but it has been around for a long time. When Eisenhower stepped down from the Presidency, he requested to be referred to as General Eisenhower, rather than President Eisenhower (which is also traditional), and the press, etc. did just that till he died.
It's refreshing to hear this.
Hmmmmmm...that puts your statement about the anti-AxisofWeasel comments on this site in an interesting context.
Hussein harbored, trained and funded terrorists. Any nation that worked to keep him propped up was...
1. Not working in their own self-interest since they are potential targets.
2. Complicit with evil just so they could save face and/or cash.
Mr. Blair, being an honorable man, would not collaborate with Syria to save a few pounds. Also, he well realizes that Britain is high on the target list. Therefore, the terrible "neo-cons" of whom you speak would cut him some slack, because we (am I a neo-con? I have no idea!) would realize he was working from honest motives. This can certainly not be said about Chiraq, Schroeder or Putin.
Sweat not, and welcome home to FR.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.