To: ATCNavyRetiree
"I think that people are saddened it got to that stage and unhappy that it happened here, and unhappy that it happened at all."He thinks. Doesn't sound to me like he thinks much at all. That wussy, PC statement makes me sick.
Restratinging orders are useless anyway. You're more likely to be dead long before the police respond. And when the plaintiff is the police chief...forget it.
I pray she pulls through.
9 posted on
04/27/2003 1:17:13 PM PDT by
cake_crumb
(UN Resolutions=Very Expensive, Very SCRATCHY Toilet Paper)
To: cake_crumb
"Restratinging" was supposed to be "restraining". Yeeesh. It looked ok when I proofread it...
20 posted on
04/27/2003 1:46:42 PM PDT by
cake_crumb
(UN Resolutions=Very Expensive, Very SCRATCHY Toilet Paper)
To: cake_crumb
Restraining orders are useless anyway. You're more likely to be dead long before the police respond. And when the plaintiff is the police chief...forget it. This case brings me to conclude that when a police chief's wife is able to convince a duly-authorized court to issue a restraining order that is intended to keep her alive, the police chief should be placed on administrative leave pending an investigation by people over his pay grade.
37 posted on
04/27/2003 2:17:23 PM PDT by
GretchenEE
(We export freedom.)
To: cake_crumb
He thinks. Doesn't sound to me like he thinks much at all. That wussy, PC statement makes me sick. What's objectionable about that statement? It's just a guy saying it's a bad thing some guy shot his wife.
73 posted on
04/27/2003 2:42:12 PM PDT by
MattAMiller
(Iraq was liberated in my name, how about yours?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson