Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/23/2003 10:56:42 AM PDT by Enemy Of The State
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Enemy Of The State
A very astute article and an important post.
2 posted on 04/23/2003 11:10:12 AM PDT by liberallarry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enemy Of The State
Bttt to read later....
3 posted on 04/23/2003 11:18:04 AM PDT by Guenevere (...STAY THE COURSE!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AmericanInTokyo
Interesting article; thought you would be interested.
5 posted on 04/23/2003 11:21:41 AM PDT by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enemy Of The State
It is true that the US survived in the Korean War because it holed up in the Pusan Perimeter. It took the N. Koreans a while to get that far, the distance to Pusan being about 300 miles or so. Also significant is that there is no artillery round that would reach that far. Gulf II has shown that the new Patriot can knock down Scuds.

So, in short, it makes sense for the US to move their troops to the southern portion of the peninsula where it is harder to target them. If the N. Koreans move across the border our air power will decimate them before they get too far.

The only issue becomes nuclear. NK has said the only real protection anymore is nuclear. We must take that capability away from them and from other rogue states. Nuclear capability must remain extremely rare. We should be willing to go to war over that issue.

6 posted on 04/23/2003 12:14:42 PM PDT by RockBassCreek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enemy Of The State
"Together with other neo-conservatives who urged the Iraq war..."

Conservatives coined neo-conservative to refer to liberals who had seen the light and became conservative. Many even switched parties. Ronald Reagan is a perfect example.

The left cannot stand the fact that the right might influence language.

Liberals have successfully co-opted the word "neo-con" and have given it their own definition.

Heaven forbid that conservatives could define their own words.

yitbos

7 posted on 04/23/2003 12:55:33 PM PDT by bruinbirdman ("Those who control language control minds.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enemy Of The State
Andrew Marshall, key strategic analyst at Pentagon's Office of Net Assessment, has been toying with the idea of creating huge buoyant platforms that can double as the launch pads and runways of US warplanes

These are featured in the novel "1984", where Orwell calls them "Floating Fortresses".

8 posted on 04/23/2003 1:23:43 PM PDT by Argus (Credo quia absurdum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enemy Of The State
Rummy Bump
9 posted on 04/23/2003 4:15:03 PM PDT by TUX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enemy Of The State
Asia Times loves the term "neo-conservative".
10 posted on 04/23/2003 4:15:42 PM PDT by tuna_battle_slight_return
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enemy Of The State
"If Bush is re-elected next year, there is every likelihood that Rumsfeld will be retained in his present capacity as the secretary of defense"

From your post to Gods ears!!

12 posted on 04/23/2003 6:07:35 PM PDT by Vets_Husband_and_Wife ("CNN - WE report WHEN WE decide.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson