Skip to comments.
Embedded reporter comes away from front lines torn
Boston Globe
| 4/22/2003
| Scott Bernard Nelson
Posted on 04/23/2003 10:10:37 AM PDT by LavaDog
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-112 last
To: WOSG
Interesting point of view.
You may be right.
To: Lance Romance
the story seems to tell of a liberal reporter who suddenly realizes how noble the military really is. And seems embarassed about it.
He wasn't sure to where I was referring
Perhaps he can work on his grammar now that he's home.
102
posted on
04/23/2003 6:50:38 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: Motherbear
I think his point is that fear has a way of changing one's perspective.THEN he should have stated so. To fail, then, in his attempt to convey that is to have failed utterly as a writer - this man's paid vocation. I think he's now trying to justify what he wrote while embdedded - now that he's back among his liberal 'friends' on the cocktail circuit.
103
posted on
04/23/2003 7:03:15 PM PDT
by
_Jim
(ac)
To: LavaDog
If these guys are so worried about "objectivity," why didn't a bunch of them get embedded with the Republican Guard units?
104
posted on
04/23/2003 7:03:50 PM PDT
by
Timmy
To: verity
I wonder if a Marine in combat would think less of a Marine in the rear-echelon. Doubtful. There might be some bragging rights and stories of pure hell, but I would imagine that most Marines would appreciate the shared experiences that they had to become Marines regardless of what their tasks were.
A better question would be, Does the combat soldier respect some ride-along-johnny reporter more than any rear-echelon volunteer soldier who has trained to perform an assigned task AND hit a target?
105
posted on
04/23/2003 7:10:21 PM PDT
by
kaboom
To: _Jim
I think you're right. This is a mea culpa for seeming to have switched sides during the war, now that he is back home with the Boston Globe's America-haters. Otherwise, why in the world would he write this drivel? He is no Ernie Pyle.
To: Mrs. P
There were plenty of freelancers who got into Iraq and were running around on their own selling stories to news nets. Several were killed, as well as the handful we know about by name that were oficially embedded.
To: mvpel
Another testimony to the sheer genius of embedding journalists.
Many of these embeds were young and made a big name for themselves with their reporting. They will be around a LONG time and will always remember their Iraq experience. Whoever thought of this should be given a raise.
To: LavaDog
Most people who have been embedded, regret it in the morning.
109
posted on
04/23/2003 8:01:27 PM PDT
by
ido_now
To: Senator_Blutarski
I am so glad that we had the embeded reporters. It had to have the effect of, at the least, new respect for our military.
When I first heard Tory talking about this months ago, I thought she had lost her mind. {I remember Vietnam...}
It worked out wonderfully, and I appreciated the pieces of the war that I could see live on tv. David Bloom was my favorite...R.I.P. I surfed constantly.
110
posted on
04/23/2003 8:34:09 PM PDT
by
meema
To: Incorrigible
Pansy huh? I take it your wartime experiences are more heroic?
You are correct sir! In fact, my post in that thread says as much.
I read through the thread but don't recall any mention of your wartime experiences. Which post are you referring to?
To: Stone Mountain
No, I meant your sarcasm is correct. I have no heroic military deeds to speak of.
Again, I made the error of parroting the majority of the posts on that thread and that is what I regret.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-112 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson