Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: editor-surveyor; Commander8; ksen; maestro
Bump for read.
2 posted on 04/19/2003 5:49:09 AM PDT by fortheDeclaration
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: fortheDeclaration
"I believe the Authorised Version perserves the Word of God for me in the English tongue and that it contains no errors".


I guess he did not get a copy of that letter that was placed in the front of the 1611, a warning to the readers that there was discourse - argument regarding what words to use in the translation.

Reason that when one uses the King James version one needs (Strongs) to look up the words from the original languages to see that man choose what words to use in their translation.

Reason why we are told what would happen to those who would add or take away from the Written Word.
6 posted on 04/19/2003 6:06:37 AM PDT by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson