Skip to comments.
Marine Takes Short Trip in Iraqi Tank
AP ^
| April 14, 2003
Posted on 04/14/2003 5:30:07 PM PDT by Shermy
BAGHDAD, Iraq - Capt. Daniel Schmitt looked eagerly at the tank and then explained. "I have a hobby. I drive every single thing in the Marine Corps at least once."
But this is a Russian-made T-72 Iraqi tank, not a Marine vehicle.
"It is now," Schmitt said, and grinned like the Cheshire Cat as he climbed into the tank for a short joyride through a palm grove on Monday.
Schmitt, commanding officer of the Weapons Company of the 3rd Battalion, 7th Marines, is admired and respected by his men not only because he began as an enlisted man like most of them but also for his mischievous wackiness.
He asks his Marines to share bawdy stories with him. He calls his rifle Condoleezza, because it is a nice name and it pays homage to National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice.
And the 31-year-old from Glen Ellyn, Ill., does exuberant things like climb into an Iraqi tank for a cruise. Even though the T-72 tank, once the pride of the Republican Guard, is more than a decade old and in bad shape.
Schmitt dreamed of driving the tank when he first saw it parked by the side of a road Sunday in the northern Baghdad neighborhood of Tunis, which his Marines are patrolling.
The battered, rusty monster appeared to have been abandoned in a hurry an old pair of Iraqi army trousers were attached to it by a cord, as if hung out to dry.
Schmitt was delighted to learn it still worked, and he joked of making it his personal vehicle.
Cpl. Jeff Fowler, 21, of Chesnee, S.C., drove the roaring, clanking tank from the road into the Marine camp beneath the palm trees Monday.
A few minutes later, Schmitt got a quick driving lesson from Fowler, who had learned to operate the Russian-made tank in an Army course.
After a few false starts and more coaching from Fowler, Schmitt began backing the tank among the trees with jerky motions, like a teenager learning to drive a stick-shift car in a parking lot.
The tank continued to lurch as he pulled away from the camp, where his Marines watched with gaping mouths, and headed into another palm grove.
There weren't any U.S. troops other than his own unit in the area, so there was no danger of his being mistaken for a renegade Iraqi.
But Schmitt confined his driving to the grove, out of fear that if he drove the tank farther into the neighborhood he would get shot by Marines.
After about five minutes, he brought the tank back to camp and parked it next to a palm tree.
He popped out and grabbed his rifle.
"Come here, Condoleezza," he said. "I wasn't with another woman. It's a tank. You're still my baby."
TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: embeddedreport; holdmuhbeer; iraqifreedom; joyride
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-58 next last
1
posted on
04/14/2003 5:30:07 PM PDT
by
Shermy
To: Kenny Bunk; mhking; dighton; swarthyguy
Hold muh beer alert?
2
posted on
04/14/2003 5:31:44 PM PDT
by
Shermy
To: Shermy
LOL
3
posted on
04/14/2003 5:32:20 PM PDT
by
Dog Gone
To: Shermy
Good story, I like it!
To: All
Strong Conservative Forums Help Prevent Candidates Like This From Winning Elections
|
|
Finish Strong. Donate Here By Secure Server
Or mail checks to FreeRepublic , LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
|
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD- It is in the breaking news sidebar!
|
5
posted on
04/14/2003 5:36:01 PM PDT
by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: Squantos; Travis McGee; Jeff Head
Been there, done that. LOL.
6
posted on
04/14/2003 5:36:11 PM PDT
by
patton
(DUCT TAPE! Get the DUCT TAPE!)
To: Cuttnhorse
LOL, he comes from the town right next to mine. Lots of crazy gun lovers from around here.
7
posted on
04/14/2003 5:36:33 PM PDT
by
Lockbar
To: Shermy
Now they're able to breathe easier, having fun.
8
posted on
04/14/2003 5:38:24 PM PDT
by
swheats
To: Shermy
Only would have been a "Hold Muh Beer" alert if he'd tried the autoloader....been known to amputate arms.
It's interesting to note that despite the common reputation of Russian equipment being "simple" and "rugged" and "reliable" and American equipment being "unecessarily complex", The M1 tank has its main gun loaded by hand, while T-72s have their main gun loaded by an (often unreliable) automatic loader.
9
posted on
04/14/2003 5:39:38 PM PDT
by
John H K
To: Shermy
What a great story!
10
posted on
04/14/2003 5:42:36 PM PDT
by
Grampa Dave
(Being a Monthly Donor to Free Republic is the Right Thing to do!)
To: Shermy
"Come here, Condoleezza," he said. "I wasn't with another woman. It's a tank. You're still my baby."BAWWAAHHHAA! Best line I've heard in a while.
11
posted on
04/14/2003 5:44:14 PM PDT
by
Damocles
(Find a "Rally for America" near you and support our troops)
To: John H K
The M1 tank has its main gun loaded by hand... Psssst! That's to keep Pvt Jessica Lynch and Spec Shoshanna Johnson out of the turret. Females can't handle the weight of the rounds. </whisper>
I wouldn't have guts to drive that thing around for fear of the A10's.
12
posted on
04/14/2003 5:48:33 PM PDT
by
Theophilus
(Muslim clerics, preaching jihad, are Weapons Of Mass Destruction!)
To: John H K
The M1 tank has its main gun loaded by hand, while T-72s have their main gun loaded by an (often unreliable) automatic loader. LOL, I knew gun bunnies of Polish extraction who used to load the 155mm howitzer by hand. The rounds weighed about 90 pounds and they would not only get it in the tube by themselves, but ram it. (much more upper body strength than mine)
13
posted on
04/14/2003 5:49:46 PM PDT
by
TC Rider
(The United States Constitution © 1791. All Rights Reserved.)
To: John H K
while T-72s have their main gun loaded by an (often unreliable) automatic loader Unreliable? Hardly - you could rely on it to try and load the gunner on a regular basis.
14
posted on
04/14/2003 5:49:47 PM PDT
by
Tennessee_Bob
(Dieses sieht wie ein Job nach Nothosen aus!)
To: Shermy
Uurah
As long as we keep getting Men like this, there's no way we will ever lose a war.
Semper Fi
15
posted on
04/14/2003 5:52:24 PM PDT
by
Leatherneck_MT
(Another Marine Reporting Sir, I've served my time in Hell)
To: John H K
It's interesting to note that despite the common reputation of Russian equipment being "simple" and "rugged" and "reliable" and American equipment being "unecessarily complex", The M1 tank has its main gun loaded by hand, while T-72s have their main gun loaded by an (often unreliable) automatic loader.Not only is it unreliable, it's also a lot slower than a Mk1 GI loader, US.
To: Shermy
Pretty cool.
Now, let's take it to Camp Pendleton (or Camp Lejune) for a trophy. :)
17
posted on
04/14/2003 6:09:45 PM PDT
by
LibKill
(Nuke Berlin! Better late than never.)
To: Shermy
I don't know if it is different in the T-72, but I once tried to get in the drivers seat of a T-60. No figgen way and I was 5'10, 160. The thing must of been driven by munchkins.
18
posted on
04/14/2003 6:19:00 PM PDT
by
Leisler
To: John H K
The M1 tank has its main gun loaded by hand, while T-72s have their main gun loaded by an (often unreliable) automatic loader. Even if they T-72 is capable of firing rounds faster than the M1-A1, it doesn't matter. The M1-A1 can kill targets from longer ranges and reliably kills its target with its first shot.
To: Shermy
Hold muh beer alert?He's a Marine, and he's an officer. They call that eccentric. I'm glad he's on our side. ;>)
/john
20
posted on
04/14/2003 6:23:04 PM PDT
by
JRandomFreeper
(Who died and left Escoffier in charge? Oh, yeah, Mssrs. Careme, Dubois, and Bernard.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-58 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson