Skip to comments.
Some see victory extending beyond (Plan for the World based on the Bush Doctrine -- a "must read")
USA Today ^
| April 11, 2003
| Barbara Slavin
Posted on 04/11/2003 3:08:53 PM PDT by FairOpinion
Edited on 04/13/2004 1:40:31 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
To: maro
My name is the result of an inside joke from school. It's also a play on words. Hapax Legomenon is a mistake made be ones master. You don't dare claim he has made a mistake. Instead you admit he has invented a special case or useage just this one time.
Thus my mis-spelled name is what it is.
Thanks anyway. Most people don't notice.
To: laz17
Exactly. Preemption should be a key part of our strategy.
Here is historical justification:
"Operation BRAVO
A generation ago, the White House was gripped by reports that "Red" China was preparing to build its own nuclear weapons.
It called for the United States to prevent the People's Republic from building a nuclear weapon by launching a secret attack against a weapons plant in north central China.
The plan was vetoed on the urging of the State Department. China went forward with its nuclear weapons program, exploding its first device (right) at its Lop Nor test site on Oct. 16, 1964."
"Soon after the Soviet Union exploded its first nuclear bomb in August of 1949, the United States decided it needed to learn more about the types of weapons its enemy was building."
------
If we had gone in and bombed their nuclear facilities AT THE BEGINNING in a PREEMPTIVE strike, we could have avoided 50 years of cold war. Just think about it!
THIS is why we had to take out Iraq and all other rogue nations supporting terrorists and building WMD.
(Historical info from thread:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/891395/posts Greatest secrets of cold war)
To: FairOpinion
I think a MOAB demonstration for the Syrian border patrol on some Iraqi intransigents is in order. Just to send a "friendly" reminder that we have bigger bombs than their "human" suicide bombers could ever dream of.
V
23
posted on
04/11/2003 7:44:37 PM PDT
by
Beck_isright
("QUAGMIRE" - French word for unable to find anyone to surrender to)
To: TruthShallSetYouFree
"From p*ssy to posse in one administration."
FR post of the day!!!!!!!!!
V
24
posted on
04/11/2003 7:45:44 PM PDT
by
Beck_isright
("QUAGMIRE" - French word for unable to find anyone to surrender to)
To: BJClinton
What about seriesly hugh enormity?
25
posted on
04/11/2003 7:46:30 PM PDT
by
Beck_isright
("QUAGMIRE" - French word for unable to find anyone to surrender to)
To: HapaxLegamenon
Of course, what it really means is a single instance, said of lexical items that show up exactly once in the extant classical works, and by extension any canon.
26
posted on
04/11/2003 8:32:04 PM PDT
by
maro
To: FairOpinion
bump
To: FairOpinion
Oh, boy, this is really going to PISS OFF my liberal friend....she was talking about the special done by, not 60 minutes, but another one of those shows, describing how this all started back in about 1991....and how the Hawks are in charge (which she is fearful of.) Of course, she's a Canadian, now naturalized American, who thinks we should listen to the rest of the countries of the world, i.e. Canada, France, Germany, et al....and not have them turn against us. Me, I talk about LEADERSHIP, which is what this is all about, as well as fighting off the enemy.
28
posted on
04/11/2003 8:40:02 PM PDT
by
goodnesswins
(CNN...the MOST TRUSTED in News......by CRIMINALS!)
To: Lael
"Well I Guess he DIDN'T go wobbly in the legs!! Now, "W", lets do the REST of the AXIS of EVIL!!"
---
ping
Given your tag line in another thread, I figured you'll enjoy reading this article, in case you missed it.
To: FairOpinion
LOVE this plan! I hope they accomplish their objectives for the world. It will surely reshape the world for the better.Ah, but I think there's more to this than meets the eye. The fall of the Soviet Union has created a power vacuum, and vacuums tend to get filled.
Russia, China, France and Germany would have liked Saddam's regime to grow. They had been nurturing it along for years, hoping that America would express a lot of fluff and bluster, but not really do anything about it. The R, C, F and G plan of nation building had the vision of a stable mideast under the iron grip of Saddam Hussein. A Bathest empire would be much more preferable than a Wahabbi empire. The US vision of nation building is to create a democratic alternative to the Bathest empire.
It appears that America is winning the first battles in the proxy war between the American and European struggle to fill the Soviet Union vacuum.
Anyone want to bet that there won't be other proxy wars between America and R, C, F and G?
To: powderhorn
BTT
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson