To: jporcus
I agree, and have been down on Hack (and some of the Generals). But, you know what? This man and those Generals put their lives on the line and fought for us in the past. So, I say, give them a pass. Give them a pass for trying to deflate moral in the battlefield for purely partisan and vain reasons?
Sorry I disagree, these embedded tv studio generals behavior was disgusting.
7 posted on
04/10/2003 2:26:13 AM PDT by
Dane
To: Dane
I liked the "armchair generals" who stuck to answering questions about tactics, equipment, and standard operating procedure.
Some of them even managed halfway decent force movement briefings on the map. (Shep, let's go to the screenwriter...)
The ones I didn't like were the ones who second-guessed "The Plan."
9 posted on
04/10/2003 2:30:22 AM PDT by
Retrofire
(Let's roll!)
To: Dane
Sorry I disagree, these embedded tv studio generals behavior was disgusting. IMO, these "EX" military brass are just as disguting as Clinton and Carter and their smearing of Bush during war time or at any time for that matter.
I've yet to see a Republican smear a Democrat when the tables were turned.
19 posted on
04/10/2003 3:16:38 AM PDT by
Gracey
To: Dane
Give them a pass for trying to deflate moral in the battlefield for purely partisan and vain reasons? Sorry I disagree, these embedded tv studio generals behavior was disgusting. Ditto. Hack has zero credibility after his three weeks of pandering. I view him as little different than the democrat presidential candidates who came out against the war, hoping we would be defeated and they'd come out ahead politically. Hack displayed the same behavior in a different arena.
To: Dane
Bump!
41 posted on
04/10/2003 9:31:25 AM PDT by
Howlin
(It's a great day to be an American -- or an Iraqi!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson