FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794
It is in the breaking news sidebar!
Posted on 04/09/2003 9:19:28 PM PDT by dufekin
It began as just another day in the village of Drodro. But the seething ethnic hatred that too often burbles under human flesh in this part of central Africa twisted its way to the surface yet again last Thursday.
Amid the verdant hills and emerald forests that cloak much of Congo like a hot velvet blanket, someone reportedly blew a whistle. And a killing party began. On cue, armed soldiers and civilians -- men, women and even children -- took up machetes and hacked their neighbors to death.
In a span of three to eight hours, nearly 1,000 people were massacred, the United Nations has confirmed. In a nation increasingly known for ethnic cleansing and astonishing violence, this was the worst single atrocity in the 4 1/2 years of civil war that have ravaged the former Zaire, according to a U.N. spokesman.
That's quite a feat, considering that this war and its associated problems have already claimed the lives of 2 million people.
Just one question: Did you hear about it?
My guess is, probably not. As a regular reader of African news, I had to dig through the world press just to find five stories on the incident. And this comes on the heels of a two-week killing spree in Congo last month that left hundreds more dead, and after particularly gruesome reports of ethnic cannibalism there last year.
How can the murder of nearly 1,000 innocent people, sliced to death in a few hours, go unnoticed in the age of constant news bombardment?
Simple. We're all too busy logging onto CNN.com's ``War Tracker,'' channel surfing among the shouting heads on primetime television, or answering meaningless online polls to notice. The big satellite channels report the news, certainly. But as businesses, they also focus in on the stories they think viewers want to see, almost to the exclusion of all else.
The result: All war in Iraq, all the time. And this week, if it ain't in Baghdad, Basra or Baqubah, chances are viewers won't see it.
Fair enough, to a point. When our neighbors and loved ones are slugging it out in Baghdad, and the global stakes are so high, no one can blame Americans for wanting to watch or read stories on Iraq.
But inattention to a crime of the magnitude in Congo raises several issues.
One, I wonder if the lowly machete, which also took the bulk of 800,000 Rwandan lives in 1994, shouldn't be classified as a weapon of mass destruction. When you compare that death toll with the 103,000 souls who perished in the atomic blasts at Hiroshima and Nagasaki, a compelling case can certainly be made.
Two, the world doesn't pick and choose its problems for our viewing convenience. Our almost exclusive focus on Iraq doesn't mean that worse things aren't happening elsewhere. The irony is that with inescapable 24-hour news, we seem to have less variety in stories and far-ranging reporting than we did 10 years ago.
Three, the public is poorly served by a passive examination of news, a blind acceptance of editors' and network honchos' decisions about what is and isn't newsworthy, and what does and doesn't deserve our attention. Awareness of horrific events like the one in Congo last week provides a context for understanding and comparison the next time a politician tells you Americans need to oust Evil Dictator X or launch an attack on Country Y.
And four, one of the rationales for attacking Iraq that resonated most with Americans was to prevent Saddam Hussein from killing and further terrorizing innocent Iraqis. To underscore the point, the Bush administration dusted off ghastly, 15-year-old photos of slaughtered Kurds.
But we need to think about why some lives -- Kurds, Kosovars, Iraqis -- are worth American attention, tax dollars and political capital while others are not. Be assured that the rest of the world is asking that question.
The United States may not have a strategic or economic interest in Congo. But after the Iraq war is finished, it will be in our interest to return to President Bush's original vision of a powerful but benevolent America.
And while invading Congo is certainly a bad idea, willingness to rally international attention to the carnage there is not. Otherwise, Americans ignore some atrocities and act on others at our own moral and diplomatic peril.
(Excerpt) Read more at pilotonline.com ...
Answer:
This must have NOTHING to do with the practice of 'Islam'.
Just another sunny day in Africa. It would be a mistake to intervene militarily, for it wouldn't be right for us to infringe on their way of life. We need to stop being so judgmental. It's perfectly acceptable in some cultures to hack your neighbors to death with machetes.
Rhodesia was the jewel of Africa ... until someone named Mugabe f$%^ed it up
Klintoon thought the "genocide" in the Balkans was a far more important matter. And it had the added benefit of being a war against Christians. The Slickster couldn't pass up such an opportunity. The 800,000 slaughtered Rwandans, on the other hand, probably didn't even register on his radar.
In order for us to help them, they must first want our help. When the US tries to intervene, we're labeled racists, imperialists, colonizers, etc.
In Zimbabwe, thousands are dying because their leader, Robert Mugabe, has taken land from the white farmers and "redistributed" it to his followers. These followers have no experience farming, can't work the land, the farmers are forbidden to occupy and work it, and the country is starving.
The US sent tons of grain to Zimbabwe to aid the stricken, but the grain rots in cargo holds and warehouses because the government refuses to distribute it. The UN and EU have condemned our action, claiming we're trying to force genetically engineered crops down the throats of the uninformed populace.
The "uninformed populace" is scrounging in the dirt for bugs, weeds -- anything edible. We tried to help, and were rebuffed.
There's nothing we can do for them. They won't allow it.
It is a Worldview of relativism called the survival of the fitist.
Darwin's 'Super-Race'.......is racism!
"Go Evolution Go"
/Sarcasm
Call me cynical, but as long as it's just black on black killing the world(UN) does not care. If the US and Israel/Western civilization could somehow be implicated then they might give it a go.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.