Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sandia Attains Nuclear Fusion
Albuquerque Journal | Tuesday, April 8, 2003 | John Fleck

Posted on 04/08/2003 8:52:09 AM PDT by woofie

Scientists at Sandia National Laboratories have re-created a star's fire.

In a series of experiments using the lab's Z machine over the past nine months, they demonstrated the ability to generate tiny bursts of nuclear fusion, the same energy that fuels H-bombs and stars, the researchers said at a meeting of the American Physical Society in Philadelphia. "We're trying to create a star in the laboratory," said Jeff Quintenz, head of Sandia's fusion research program.

The research is driven by a need to duplicate the conditions on a nuclear battlefield. But it also means Z's unique technological approach has demonstrated that it can compete with more established nuclear fusion technologies, which backers hope will some day generate plentiful and clean energy supplies.

"It's a big deal," Quintenz said.

Sandia scientist Ray Leeper presented the results to physicists at the Philadelphia meeting.

In the long run, Sandia's achievement provides another possible technological path toward the elusive but so far impractical goal of producing power with nuclear fusion.

In the short run, it means Sandia's Z technology is now one of three techniques capable of producing fusion in the lab, Quintenz said in an interview.

The "lab," in this case, is a massive machine filling a building the size of a basketball gymnasium.

The Z machine is shaped like a giant bicycle wheel, with large electrical storage devices around the outer edges. On a precise cue, all the electricity is discharged in an instant down the wheel's spokes at a small target in a steel chamber at the hub of the wheel.

The tiny target being blasted experiences, for an instant, radiation and temperature similar to those found in stars or nuclear weapons.

For the fusion experiments, the Sandia scientists used that blast to crush targets the size of a BB packed with hydrogen.

In the instant of the blast, the experiment concentrated enough heat and pressure for hydrogen atoms to fuse together, creating helium and throwing off high-energy neutrons in the process.

The temperature at the heart of the reaction reached 10 million degrees Celsius, Quintenz said.

For those who see fusion as a future energy source, the Sandia experiment suffers from the same problem as other laboratory fusion efforts. The amount of energy required to ignite the reaction is far greater than the amount produced by the resulting fusion.

But for Sandia's primary purpose, nuclear weapons research, Z's fusion is invaluable, Quintenz said.

One of Sandia's jobs is to certify that U.S. nuclear weapons can survive a nuclear battlefield. Duplicating nuclear fusion in the lab allows them to simulate that "hostile environment" under controlled conditions, Quintenz said.

The experiments provide data Sandia can use in its computer simulations of how U.S. nuclear weapon components would fare when blasted with radiation during a nuclear attack.

The scientists first achieved fusion nine months ago, doing some 30 experiments to verify the result. "We want to be real cautious," Quintenz said. "We don't want to get it wrong."

The proof of fusion is in the burst of neutrons thrown out by the reaction. Fusion happens when two atoms — in this case deuterium, a kind of hydrogen — are squeezed together so tightly they fuse into a single atom.

For the Z reaction, pairs of deuterium atoms were fused to make helium, throwing off a fast-moving subatomic particle called a neutron in the process.

"The name of the game in fusion is the production of neutrons," Quintenz said.

The scientists had to precisely measure the speed and direction of those neutrons to demonstrate they were produced by nuclear fusion and not something else.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: fusion; realscience; sandia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last

1 posted on 04/08/2003 8:52:09 AM PDT by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: woofie
Way to end our dependence on foreign oil?
2 posted on 04/08/2003 8:53:57 AM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
Its a ways of but could happen
3 posted on 04/08/2003 8:55:43 AM PDT by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: woofie
BIG PIC Coming


4 posted on 04/08/2003 8:56:08 AM PDT by Texas_Jarhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
Not until you can invent a container that can hold 10 million degress Celsius.
5 posted on 04/08/2003 8:56:13 AM PDT by wastoute
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: woofie
of=off
6 posted on 04/08/2003 8:56:30 AM PDT by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: wastoute
Not until you can invent a container that can hold 10 million degress Celsius.

My wife makes her chili in a pot that may hold it.

7 posted on 04/08/2003 8:58:08 AM PDT by ladtx ("...the very obsession of your public service must be Duty, Honor, Country." D. MacArthur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: woofie
How is the Z machine different from a Tokomak, a fusion device also torroidal in shape?
8 posted on 04/08/2003 8:58:12 AM PDT by bert (Don't Panic !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
Nope.

US nuclear fusion research and development has been on a funding logic that precludes actually building a device powerful enough to have a chance of getting to breakeven, let alone ignition.

You see, Congress has demanded that we know that any proposed breakeven/ignition device will work WITH CERTAINTY before we try to build it.

The problem is that you can't know with certainty; that's why it's called "research and development."
9 posted on 04/08/2003 8:59:10 AM PDT by Poohbah (Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bert
A Tokamak confines the fusion reaction inside a toroid.

The Z Machine confines it inside a sphere, and the "toroid" is used solely to hold the power components.
10 posted on 04/08/2003 9:00:31 AM PDT by Poohbah (Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: woofie
BTTT
11 posted on 04/08/2003 9:06:17 AM PDT by EternalHope (Chirac is funny, France is a joke.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wastoute
I seen something like this on the Discovery channel. They explained that they were going to use high power magnets to force the heat away from the sides ust enough for it to not melt through.
12 posted on 04/08/2003 9:06:35 AM PDT by OXENinFLA (---------)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: wastoute
Not until you can invent a container that can hold 10 million degress Celsius.

A magnetic "bottle".

13 posted on 04/08/2003 9:07:02 AM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: *RealScience
http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/bump-list
14 posted on 04/08/2003 9:07:04 AM PDT by Libertarianize the GOP (Ideas have consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: woofie
Sandia Scientists Confirm; Huge Pulsed Power Machine Enters Fusion Arena!!!

Science Daily ^ | 2003-04-07 | Editorial Staff



Posted on 04/07/2003 4:26 PM PDT by vannroxhttp://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/887545/posts
15 posted on 04/08/2003 9:08:30 AM PDT by Libertarianize the GOP (Ideas have consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: woofie
They should be careful. Look at the last star that was created in a labaratory:


16 posted on 04/08/2003 9:08:52 AM PDT by sharktrager
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bert
In the case of the Z machine, the reaction chamber is about the same size as the eraser on a #2 pencil. The entire machine is 120 feet in diameter. Tiny compared to a tokamak.
17 posted on 04/08/2003 9:09:43 AM PDT by 11B3 (.308 holes make invisible souls. Belt fed liberal eraser.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: woofie
Uh-oh, does this mean the Sandis have a nuclear bomb too?
18 posted on 04/08/2003 9:11:58 AM PDT by Hatteras (The Thundering Herd Of Turtles ROCK!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas_Jarhead
..picture is dramatic but misleading. It is the static residue being discharged from the huge oil filled capacitors that store the charge.
19 posted on 04/08/2003 9:21:26 AM PDT by Banjoguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
You see, Congress has demanded that we know that any proposed breakeven/ignition device will work WITH CERTAINTY before we try to build it.

Same logic they use with SDI: prove to me that "works" before I approve funding... More foot-dragging.

20 posted on 04/08/2003 9:22:02 AM PDT by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson