Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dear Senator Kerry, Thank you.
My Anger | 04/04/03 | Michael Smith

Posted on 04/04/2003 7:45:29 PM PST by Big Okie

Thank you Senator Kerry.

Thank you for further clarifying and segregating yourself from the overwhelming majority of Americans who are very proud of, and grateful for our current President and his administration.


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last
Thank you Senator Kerry.

Thank you for further clarifying and segregating yourself from the overwhelming majority of Americans who are very proud of, and grateful for our current President and his administration. It goes without saying, too, that this country is honored to have such an honest and forthright individual at the helm of liberty and freedom as we weather through this threatening storm. Your statement now affords you a reserved seat on the bus to Irrelevantville with stops along way in Paris, Brussels and Berlin. You'll be seated next to Senator Daschle, and, The Dixie Chicks will be playing on the CD throughout your journey (descent, actually).

You view this President and his administration as a regime? What does that make the so called leaderships of all but one Arab country? How about North Korea? Cuba? Your carefully selected phrase, describing a sitting U.S. President and his administration, during a war to relieve the world of a murderous, tyrannical terrorist with un-Godly designs for the future, is telling of your character.

If you're so disgruntled and oppressed here in America may I suggest you throw your Vietnam medals over the fence and onto the lawn of the White House…as you did about 30 years ago. You still have your Vietnam medals, though, because the first time you threw Vietnam medals over the White House fence to protest a war they weren't your medals.

Come on Senator Kerry. A "regime" this bad should surely warrant tossing your own war honors over the fence this time. They're on the wall in your office. Stand up! Rip them down! Disown the horror and imperialism they represent! Throw them back to the country that foisted them upon your chest!

You're not that brave. Perhaps you're waiting for a brave young man or woman currently serving in Iraq, eliminating a world threat and freeing a country starved of the smallest morsel of freedom or dignity, to come home and lend you their medals. Yours look good up there on the wall and they give visitors the false impression that you're a man who was proud to serve his country and defend a deserving people.

So, again I thank you. Thank you for further clarifying why the people of this country should assign deep discounts to your service, your positions, and your ambitions. By pushing so hard to stand out in a crowd you have succeeded. There aren't many standing with you, though, for a reason.

To check your effectiveness, touch base with the campaign finance regulators and behold the balances over at the NRSC. They just got another $25 from a Joe-bag-o-donuts in Northridge, Ca. That'd be me.

Thanks, again, Senator Kerry. I mean it. Thank you.

Give yourself a medal, man.

Michael K. Smith Northridge, Ca

1 posted on 04/04/2003 7:45:29 PM PST by Big Okie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Big Okie
Senator Kerry claims that his prior military service gives him the 'right' to slander and defame the Commander-in-Chief, in a borderline treasonous manner. However, Senator Kerry should look to history to examine the quality of his claim that "prior military service" gives him the right to be treasonous.

During the Revolutionary War, Benedict Arnold served the nascent American Republic as an officer in the Continental Army. He was viewed by many as a genuine American hero. However, when Arnold decided it was in his best, personal interest to change sides, he did. His treasonous behavior is a blot upon American history.

Senator Kerry should remember that, just as Arnold's prior military service to the Republic did not expiate his treasonous behavior, neither does Kerry's.

2 posted on 04/04/2003 7:47:45 PM PST by jimkress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Big Okie
The next guy who writes to Kerry ought to respond to his point about being a patriot by pointing out that Benedict Arnold was also a patriot before he became a traitor. The name "Benedict Kerry" does seem appropriate.
3 posted on 04/04/2003 7:51:28 PM PST by Tacis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Big Okie
toast.
4 posted on 04/04/2003 7:53:04 PM PST by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimkress
To call Kerry treasonous for voicing his opinions is the the kind of rhetoric we don't need around here. But I ditto the thank you note. He made a misstep because he is lean and hungry for power, and thus lacks a sense of proportion and judgment. Power trippers as presidents are not my cup of tea. They cut too many corners.
5 posted on 04/04/2003 7:54:31 PM PST by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Big Okie
What is he trying to accomplish? I mean, really, who is he pandering to? Surely it can't be the lunatic fringe of the Lib party or Progressives?
6 posted on 04/04/2003 7:55:12 PM PST by submarinerswife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Big Okie
Isn't the Democrat Party also run by a "regime"?
7 posted on 04/04/2003 7:56:45 PM PST by jigsaw (God Bless Our Troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Big Okie
Forgot one more thank you.......Thank you Senator Kerry for eliminating the one nearly viable candidate the Democrats "had"....Guess it's back to Al Sharpton
8 posted on 04/04/2003 7:58:17 PM PST by Sparky760
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tacis
Live - It's The "Benedict Kerry" Show!

9 posted on 04/04/2003 8:00:08 PM PST by Happy2BMe (HOLLYWOOD:Ask not what U can do for your country, ask what U can do for Iraq!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Torie
To call Kerry treasonous for voicing his opinions is the the kind of rhetoric we don't need around here.

Kerry is treasonous because his choice of words, 'regime change,' coming as it does after a major war whose purpose was regime change, is INTENDED to suggest violent overthrow of the government. It's not an accident; it is a call for civil disobedience on a scale we haven't seen, for the purpose of forcing a change in government...away from our constitutional government, to one controlled by a single party (democRATs). DemocRATs are as close to a Baath party as we have in America.

10 posted on 04/04/2003 8:08:20 PM PST by Tax Government
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Tax Government
is INTENDED to suggest violent overthrow of the government. It's not an accident; it is a call for civil disobedience on a scale we haven't seen, for the purpose of forcing a change in government...away from our constitutional government, to one controlled by a single party (democRATs).

Ludicrous, totally ludicrous. Kerry simply wants Bush to be replaced in the next election by a Democrat, preferably him. That is the American way, totally American. But he did put his foot into it, and thus gave some leash to folks like yourself to vent. Over the top rhetoric reduces the credibility of this site. Think about it.

11 posted on 04/04/2003 8:11:19 PM PST by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Big Okie
Kerry is leaving the impression that the current USA government is a regime just as Saddam Hussein's government is a regime. By calling for a regime change in the USA he is therefore encouraging the elimination of this country's government (Executive, Legislative and Judicial) and replacing it with something different. That is treason.
12 posted on 04/04/2003 8:12:47 PM PST by 2grit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Big Okie
Dear Senator Kerry

No one questions your patriotism...Its your sanity we worry about.
13 posted on 04/04/2003 8:19:20 PM PST by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Big Okie
Getting angry at Kerry is an understandable reaction. I'm angry, too, and repulsed, and a few other things I'd best not say.

But consider that he probably did us a favor. In fact, consider how fortunate we have been in our enemies. They are practically writing and producing "Bush 2004" ads for us.

I hope Kerry's statement was captured on video tape. It needs to be preserved, and it needs to be exposed to the public.

Here are a few statements and images, some by politicians on the campaign trail or in the Capitol; one by a media figure; and some by leftist demonstrators -- which, while distasteful to look at, may prove to be of much more use to "us" than they are to "them":

"I'm saddened, saddened that this president failed so miserably at diplomacy that we're now forced to war. Saddened that we have to give up one life because this president couldn't create the kind of diplomatic effort that was so critical for our country." -- Senate Minority Leader Tom Daschle (D-SD), March 18, 2003.

Desecration of British war graves in France, April 2, 2003:

"What we need now is not just a regime change in Saddam Hussein and Iraq, but we need a regime change in the United States." -- Senator (and Presidential candidate) John Kerry (D-MA), April 2, 2003.

Sign at an anti-America rally in Boston, March 29, 2003:

"Clearly, the American war planners misjudged the determination of the Iraqi forces. Now America is reappraising the battlefield, delaying the war maybe a week and rewriting the war plan." -- Former MSNBC Commentator Peter Arnett, on Iraqi TV, March 30, 2003.

Sign at an anti-America rally in San Francico, late March, 2003:


14 posted on 04/04/2003 8:23:52 PM PST by southernnorthcarolina (optional tag line, printed after my name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #15 Removed by Moderator

To: southernnorthcarolina


16 posted on 04/04/2003 8:31:19 PM PST by ALS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Latina_Abogada
Abogada-lady, the first amendment can be claimed for any kind of speech. And treason can be claimed for any kind of speech. Don't ever, ever tell me to shut up.
17 posted on 04/04/2003 8:48:00 PM PST by Tax Government
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Torie
Ludicrous...

You are underestimating Kerry's choice of words and seeking to gloss over it. Free speech is not the issue. Intended meaning is the issue. Kerry's use of 'regime change,' now, is intended to signify an upping of the stakes in the political arena and an increased willingness to tolerate civil disobedience as a political tool. You don't believe me? Does it matter? Either you recognize democrats for the disloyal opposition they have become, or you become their accomplice.

18 posted on 04/04/2003 8:55:37 PM PST by Tax Government
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Torie
"Regime change" was not an idly chosen phrase -- the word "regime" carries the distinctly negative connotation of totalitarianism, as well as that of the propensity for sudden and violent overthrow. But just in case his listeners might have missed that subtlety, Kerry drove home his point by explicitly likening Saddam's "regime" to the "regime" extant in Washington. And later given the chance to back away from his statement, he declined.

Was Kerry really calling for the violent overthrow of the United States government? Of course not. In my judgment, it was a combination of red meat for the lefties as he tries to extinguish a nasty Dean flareup in New Hampshire, and an attempt to "bait" the Bush operatives into saying something intemperate.* The statement was a miserable failure on both counts. Which is why I like to mostly just get out of the way when my opponent says something idiotic.

----------
* That was a rare triple mixed metaphor, by the way.

19 posted on 04/04/2003 8:58:22 PM PST by southernnorthcarolina (optional tag line, printed after my name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: southernnorthcarolina
Someday I will find something I disagree with you about. Give me time. In the meantime, I assume you dissociate yourself from the contention that Kerry is a "traitor." That makes sort of the sound to me that chalk sometimes makes on a chalkboard. I don't like or appreciate over the top venom. Defang the opposition with love and kindness while silently twisting the knife. That is more like it.
20 posted on 04/04/2003 9:03:41 PM PST by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson