Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China and Biological Warfare
Federation of American Scientists ^ | various | various

Posted on 03/30/2003 6:50:29 PM PST by pttttt

Chemical and Biological Weapons

China is widely reported to have active programs related to the development of chemical and biological weapons, although essentially no details of these programs have appeared in the open literature.

China is believed to have an advanced chemical warfare program that includes research and development, production and weaponization capabilities. Its current inventory is believed to include the full range of traditional chemical agents. It also has a wide variety of delivery systems for chemical agents to include artillery rockets, aerial bombs, sprayers, and short-range ballistic missiles. Chinese forces have conducted defensive CW training and are prepared to operate in a contaminated environment. As China’s program is further integrated into overall military operations, its doctrine, which is believed to be based in part on Soviet-era thinking, may reflect the incorporation of more advanced munitions for CW agent delivery. China has signed and ratified the CWC.

On 30 December 1996 the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress China ratified the Chemical Weapons Convention [CWC]. Previous, dual-use chemical-related transfers to Iran's chemical weapons program indicate that, at a minimum, China's chemical export controls are not operating effectively enough to ensure compliance with China's CWC obligation not to assist anyone in any way to acquire chemical weapons. In March 1997 Israeli authorities arrested an Israeli businessman, Nahum Manbar, for allegedly selling Chinese chemical weapon components to Iran.

On May 21, 1997, pursuant to the Chemical and Biological Weapons Control and Warfare Elimination Act of 1991, the US Government imposed trade sanctions on five Chinese individuals, two Chinese companies, and one Hong Kong company for knowingly and materially contributing to Iran's chemical weapons program. These individuals and companies were involved in the export of dual-use chemical precursors and/or chemical production equipment and technology. The Chinese companies were the Nanjing Chemical Industries Group (NCI) and the Jiangsu Yongli Chemical Engineering and Technology Import/Export Corp.

In 1939 the Japanese army established the Unit 731 germ-warfare research center in Harbin, where Japanese medical experts experimented on Chinese, Soviet, Korean, British and other prisoners.

China possesses an advanced biotechnology infrastructure as well as the requisite munitions production capabilities necessary to develop, produce and weaponize biological agents. Although China has consistently claimed that it has never researched or produced biological weapons, it is nonetheless believed likely that it retains a biological warfare capability begun before acceding to the BWC. China is commonly considered to have an active biological warfare program, including dedicated research and development activities funded and supported by the Government for this purpose. There is essentially no open source data on the subject of Chinese BW activities, and many legitimate research programs use similar, if not identical equipment and facilities.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: biologicalwarfare; biowarfare; china; chinastuff; disease; epidemic; opic; sards; sars; terror; wmd
With all the alarms being raised about SARDS and China, I wonder if a Chinese biowarfare agent that got loose could be or has been completely ruled out, or if it's being assumed away. No news source has suggested this but this disease acts like a pretty good bioterror agent and the Chinese have been less than forthcoming about it.

Also bear in mind that FAS is usually not considered to be a conservative information source.

1 posted on 03/30/2003 6:50:29 PM PST by pttttt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: pttttt
So far the kill ratio of this disease is 2%, if its a bio-weapon, it aint working too well.
2 posted on 03/30/2003 6:53:11 PM PST by NP-INCOMPLETE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pttttt
>>>the Chinese have been less than forthcoming about it.

I don't think this is news. It applys to everything they do
3 posted on 03/30/2003 6:53:59 PM PST by snooker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pttttt; Domestic Church; Mother Abigail; CathyRyan; per loin; Dog Gone; Petronski; Jim Noble; ...
I wonder if this program has any facilities in Foshan or elsewhere in Guangdong Province. Like at Foshan University. I wonder why some members of the veterinary medicine faculty at Foshan University are members of the Communist Party.
4 posted on 03/30/2003 6:55:04 PM PST by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pttttt
Hi PT,

On this thread, http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/880329/posts it says China blocked access to WHO
5 posted on 03/30/2003 6:55:19 PM PST by Calpernia (http://www.politicsandprotest.org/attack.swf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NP-INCOMPLETE
A bio-weapon doesn't have to kill in massive numbers. The objective could be to incapacitate people and tie up health care resources, which it is doing in places. And to scare people, which it's also doing.
6 posted on 03/30/2003 6:56:47 PM PST by pttttt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NP-INCOMPLETE
2% (says who) and no cure.
7 posted on 03/30/2003 7:00:21 PM PST by Robert Drobot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: pttttt
BUMP
8 posted on 03/30/2003 7:01:08 PM PST by GrandMoM ("Vengeance is Mine , I will repay," says the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NP-INCOMPLETE
As an economic disrupter, though, the potential for damage is enormous, even if the death rate is relatively low.
9 posted on 03/30/2003 7:02:35 PM PST by LPStar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NP-INCOMPLETE
Different numbers have been bandied about. 3.5%, 4%, one article today that suggested 10%.

Keep in mind that some have died, some have recovered, and some are still on breathing machines and may not recover. The disease is still poorly understood.
10 posted on 03/30/2003 7:08:29 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: *China stuff; *Bio_warfare
http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/bump-list
11 posted on 03/30/2003 7:25:12 PM PST by Libertarianize the GOP (Ideas have consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: NP-INCOMPLETE
At 2%, that's a potential of 5.5 million US deaths. You say that's no big deal?
12 posted on 03/30/2003 7:28:58 PM PST by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NP-INCOMPLETE
So far the kill ratio of this disease is 2%, if its a bio-weapon, it aint working too well.

Since the vast majority of the people who have gotten it are still sick, it is too soon to be able to compute the mortality rate. LOTS of the people who are sick are in intensive care.

13 posted on 03/30/2003 7:36:33 PM PST by EternalHope (Chirac is funny, France is a joke.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NP-INCOMPLETE
If just one of our troops in the gulf were to get this....Well you can imagine just how effective it would be in the end. I pray that does not happen.
14 posted on 03/30/2003 7:56:08 PM PST by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Revel
Sieges have a history of causing epidemics.
15 posted on 03/31/2003 6:25:14 AM PST by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson