Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US says Iraq may have chemical arms "trigger line"
Reuters | 3/28/03

Posted on 03/28/2003 6:26:54 AM PST by kattracks

US says Iraq may have chemical arms "trigger line"

AS SAYLIYA CAMP, Qatar, March 28 (Reuters) - A U.S. general said on Friday Iraq may have prepared its forces to use chemical weapons if invaders push beyond a certain line, although he had seen no signs the final order to use poison gas had been given.

"We have seen indications through a variety of sources and reporting means that first orders have been given that at a certain point chemical weapons might be used," U.S. Brigadier General Vincent Brooks told a news conference at the U.S.-led war headquarters in the Gulf state of Qatar.

But he added: "I have not seen anything that says that an order has been given to fire. We know that the capability does indeed exist, we know that the will exists and we are taking this very, very seriously."

The United States went to war to rid Iraq of chemical and biological weapons. President Saddam Hussein used chemical weapons against Iraq's Kurdish minority in 1988. He did not use them during the 1991 Gulf War and denies possessing them now.

The U.S. military has said it fears Saddam might order his forces to use chemical weapons if U.S.-led forces get close to his capital Baghdad.

"There might be trigger lines that are out there or places at which the regime would feel threatened enough that they would use (chemical weapons) and, as we add the additional evidence we have found on the battlefield, we begin to take that very seriously," Brooks said.

"We've seen chemical protective equipment in a number of areas south of where we thought that red line might be."

Iraq says having protective suits is a natural precaution.

"We expect the aggressors to use anything, we don't rule out that in their depression at being vanquished, those losers will become hysterical and commit even more folly," Information Minister Mohammed Saeed al-Sahaf said on Friday.

The threat of chemical weapons strikes has frightened some of Iraq's neighbours, especially Kuwait, which is in range of Iraqi medium-range missiles.

Brooks said a total of 12 medium-range missiles had been fired toward Kuwait from Iraq, but all those considered "threatening" had been intercepted by U.S. Patriot anti-missile defences.

"I don't think we know exactly how many launchers the Iraqis have of any particular family of weapons systems. Only the Iraqis really know," he said. "Is there an intent to continue a threat to neighbouring countries? Absolutely."

Under U.N. sanctions, Iraq was forced to give up longer-ranged missiles like the Scuds that reached Israel in 1991. But Brooks said Iraq may have longer-range missiles than permitted.

"Because of the development of expanded-range weapons systems by the Iraqis...we believe that Iraq still poses a threat to many of its neighbours by way of missiles," he said.

03/28/03 09:10 ET


TOPICS: News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: illegalweapons

1 posted on 03/28/2003 6:26:54 AM PST by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kattracks
A few spare words: Don't or there'll be hell to pay.
2 posted on 03/28/2003 6:28:10 AM PST by goldstategop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
We've prepared for this. This is why we have nuclear weapons.
3 posted on 03/28/2003 6:31:24 AM PST by 1Old Pro (The Dems are self-destructing before our eyes, How Great is That !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Heard on Fox News this morning that Iraqi soldiers were observed by either U.S. or Britain forces, in full chemical suits, gloves, boots and all, unloading barrels of what they firmly believed were chemicals. It was obvious to these observers that Saddam did have chemicals and was instructing his troops to use them.
4 posted on 03/28/2003 6:32:47 AM PST by smiley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
If there is an imaginary dotted line of death from which Iraqis will used chem weapons, then I believe our forces would out flank those positions and attack from the west since the winds will likely be blowing from west to east. Stay up wind of them.
5 posted on 03/28/2003 6:33:12 AM PST by Orangedog (Soccer-Moms are the biggest threat to your freedoms and the republic !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro
They will call our bluff on this. We have to be draconian in our response.
6 posted on 03/28/2003 6:33:59 AM PST by sheik yerbouty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
yeah but we should take that chance
7 posted on 03/28/2003 6:41:50 AM PST by kansas_jayhawks2003
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Orangedog
whats soccer moms got to do with anything?
8 posted on 03/28/2003 6:43:57 AM PST by kansas_jayhawks2003
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: kansas_jayhawks2003
It's a tag line.Goes at the end of every post. Lots of freepers have these.
9 posted on 03/28/2003 6:48:20 AM PST by Orangedog (Soccer-Moms are the biggest threat to your freedoms and the republic !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
I did see a general on TV point out that if we cross "the line" and if the Iraqis go ahead with the use of chemical weapons, they would not necessarily limit their use to the point where the line was crossed. They might initiate chem warfare at a wide variety of locations, even in areas that we consider pretty much secured. But I'm confident that our troops are ready.
10 posted on 03/28/2003 6:56:45 AM PST by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Do you ever wonder if WMD have been found but the news is not being revealed as yet? Just a thought.
11 posted on 03/28/2003 7:14:01 AM PST by Mfkmmof4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Orangedog
If he uses them in any type of wind, they will be dispersed quickly. The only thing I am worried about is making sure that the troops have fresh chem suits as they typically last about a week (from what I have heard).
12 posted on 03/28/2003 7:25:24 AM PST by Blood of Tyrants (Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn’t be, in its eyes, a slave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Mfkmmof4
Do you ever wonder if WMD have been found but the news is not being revealed as yet? Just a thought.

There have been 3 reports that they or munitions believed to contain them have been found, a Jerusalem Post report a few days ago that a camoflagued chemical plant had them (later amended to that the plant appeared to be abandoned), a CBN (Pat Robertson, not "Ya der hey") report 2 days ago that the 3rd Infantry found some Russian chemical shells (not confirmed by anyone else despite a search by, among others, Sean Hannity), and a report by the (London) Daily Telegraph that dozens of chemical shells were found by the British (other sources didn't mention the shells, and UK Defence Minister Geoff Hoon backed away from another element of that report).

All 3 reports appear to have been at best premature.

13 posted on 03/28/2003 7:27:47 AM PST by steveegg (The French have removed 1 leg from the UN; it is now LN (League of Nations).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: steveegg
I am aware of the reports but could it be that we are deliberately being told they are not WMD? I guess I have my tin-foil hat on.
14 posted on 03/28/2003 7:33:53 AM PST by Mfkmmof4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Mfkmmof4
Concerning the CBN and Daily Telegraph reports, if it's not a case of mistaken identification (or, like the ones that Magoo Blix found, were empty), positive ID would necessarily take a while (get the shells back to a secure area, open and test them in controlled circumstances).

It would make sense to not necessarily report it widely at this point. The forces in-country are already taking all the necessary precautions, and like I said, they could easily be empty.

15 posted on 03/28/2003 7:52:13 AM PST by steveegg (The French have removed 1 leg from the UN; it is now LN (League of Nations).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: steveegg
Rumors are numerous, facts are scarce.
16 posted on 03/28/2003 8:14:25 AM PST by meenie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: steveegg
Thanks for the response.
17 posted on 03/28/2003 9:08:48 AM PST by Mfkmmof4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson