I figure they were going to hate us anyway. What has to happen now, which wasn't true on 9/11, is that they need to fear us as well. |
Posted on 03/28/2003 4:59:23 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer
| My station is a threat to American media control - and they know it Faisal Bodi Friday March 28, 2003 The Guardian Last month, when it became clear that the US-led drive to war was irreversible, I - like many other British journalists - relocated to Qatar for a ringside seat. But I am an Islamist journalist, so while the others bedded down at the £1m media centre at US central command in As-Sayliyah, I found a more humble berth in the capital Doha, working for the internet arm of al-Jazeera. And yet, only a week into the war, I find myself working for the most sought-after news resource in the world. On March 23, the night the channel screened the first footage of captured US PoW's, al-Jazeera was the most searched item on the internet portal, Lycos, registering three times as many hits as the next item. I do not mean to brag - people are turning to us simply because the western media coverage has been so poor. For although Doha is just a 15-minute drive from central command, the view of events from here could not be more different. Of all the major global networks, al-Jazeera has been alone in proceeding from the premise that this war should be viewed as an illegal enterprise. It has broadcast the horror of the bombing campaign, the blown-out brains, the blood-spattered pavements, the screaming infants and the corpses. Its team of on-the-ground, unembedded correspondents has provided a corrective to the official line that the campaign is, barring occasional resistance, going to plan. Last Tuesday, while western channels were celebrating a Basra "uprising" which none of them could have witnessed since they don't have reporters in the city, our correspondent in the Sheraton there returned a rather flat verdict of "uneventful" - a view confirmed shortly afterwards by a spokesman for the opposition Supreme Council for the Islamic Revolution in Iraq. By reporting propaganda as fact, the mainstream media had simply mirrored the Blair/Bush fantasy that the people who have been starved by UN sanctions and deformed by depleted uranium since 1991 will greet them as saviours. Only hours before the Basra non-event, one of Iraq's most esteemed Shia authorities, Ayatollah Sistani, had dented coalition hopes of a southern uprising by reiterating a fatwa calling on all Muslims to resist the US-led forces. This real, and highly significant, event went unreported in the west. Earlier in the week Arab viewers had seen the gruesome aftermath of the coalition bombing of "Ansar al-Islam" positions in the north-east of the country. All but two of the 35 killed were civilians in an area controlled by a neutral Islamist group, a fact passed over with undue haste in western reports. And before that, on the second day of the war, most of the western media reported verbatim central command statements that Umm Qasr was under "coalition" control - it was not until Wednesday that al-Jazeera could confirm all resistance there had been pacified. Throughout the past week, armed peoples in the west and south have been attacking the exposed rearguard of coalition positions, while all the time - despite debilitating sandstorms - western TV audiences have seen litte except their steady advance towards Baghdad. This is not truthful reporting. There is also a marked difference when reporting the anger the invasion has unleashed on the Muslim street. The view from here is that any vestige of goodwill towards the US has evaporated with this latest aggression, and that Britain has now joined the US and Israel as a target of this rage. The British media has condemned al-Jazeera's decision to screen a 30-second video clip of two dead British soldiers. This is simple hypocrisy. From the outset of the war, the British media has not balked at showing images of Iraqi soliders either dead or captured and humiliated. Amid the battle for hearts and minds in the most information-controlled war in history, one measure of the importance of those American PoW pictures and the images of the dead British soldiers is surely the sustained "shock and awe" hacking campaign directed at aljazeera.net since the start of the war. As I write, the al-Jazeera website has been down for three days and few here doubt that the provenance of the attack is the Pentagon. Meanwhile, our hosting company, the US-based DataPipe, has terminated our contract after lobbying by other clients whose websites have been brought down by the hacking. It's too early for me to say when, or indeed if, I will return to my homeland. So far this war has progressed according to a near worst-case scenario. Iraqis have not turned against their tormentor. The southern Shia regard the invasion force as the greater Satan. Opposition in surrounding countries is shaking their regimes. I fear there remains much work to be done. · Faisal Bodi is a senior editor for aljazeera.net |
this explains why Al Jazeera lies. Kristinn, if you could get this article to Aziz Al-Taee and have him write a rebuttal, it could be extremely useful. I am sure the Guardian has a Letter to the Editor page or some such.
I.E.- al-Jazeera is BIASED and is NOT engaging in real JOURNALISM...
I figure they were going to hate us anyway. What has to happen now, which wasn't true on 9/11, is that they need to fear us as well. |
Ha ha?
That about says it all, doesn't it? If we're viewed as representing an "illegal enterprise" then any and all efforts to stop us are seen as just and favorable. Fighting against an "illegal enterprise" justifies all their atrocities against civilians and violating the Geneva Convention's rules on handling POW. Way to go al-Jazeera. You really have a bead on the illegal enterprise don't you.
With only my self-righteous vanity to keep me warm.
I am most curious. Does the above assertion imply that other media IS NOT BIASED and IS engaging in real JOURNALISM?
So much for un-biased reporting. In this one sentence, he scuttles any chance of anyone taking his organization seriously.
Any preceeding coverage of Sodom's 'grinding up' of live humans in plastic shreaders?
And neglected to mention that this was caused by Iraqi bombing!
What's your point? So is all "JOURNALISM" mere propaganda? If that's your point then you promote the media use by tyrants as "JOURNALISM" -- Tyrants use the media to promote Self not Truth.
Self promotion via a tightly controlled media is the essence of propaganda not journalism. Tyrants tell us the lie that there is NO TRUTH SAVE THEIR PERSPECTIVE.
Strange road you appear to be highlighting for us there Moses.
Now THAT would be excellent footage for Faisal Bodi and al-Jazeera who are so concerned about the present human carnage from an Islamic perspective! Video that with an audio pickup so we can all hear the screams!
What a krok of s**t that we're the "illegal enterprise." The Arab world has evidently lost it's moral compass under the guise of this cruel Islamic rule.
YEAH Jim!! Let's see some unbiased reporting!
If only that were true. The BBC, CNN and the rest of the left-leaning media can hardly be considered 'unbiased'.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
They hate us. They really hate us.