[governsleastgovernsbest]

ping

[governsleastgovernsbest]

Here are links to yesterday's threads discussing this:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/872852/posts

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/875906/posts

[punster]

I did not have to read all the way through the article to know that Hinchey is a damned Demwit.

[Illbay]

...the "Bush Doctrine" of prevention, which allows the United States to attack any other country anytime we want and for whatever reason the president feels is justified.

Let's see:

Pres. Bush asked Congress for its permission. This was debated, and then Congress voted to support the President, and allow him to pursue this "policy."

Contrast that with Bill Clinton, who asked NO ONE before he launched attacks in Yugoslavia. Clinton asked no one before he launched cruise missile attacks on Iraq, and on an aspirin factory--er, "Chemical weapons plant"--in Somalia.

Seems like the "Bush Doctrine" is constitutional. It is the CLINTON doctrine that was an obscenity.

[zip]

All the bribery and bullying did not bring us close to the nine votes needed for a Security Council sanction..

The idiot can't even read. We had 10 votes (which, I admit is close) BUT the frog government stated that they would veto any resolution presented so it became a moot point.

[EternalVigilance]

Like most idiots (that's not a French word for nothing), once caught, he digs his hole to hades even deeper.

If American troops are perpetrating a 'massacre', as he claims, how can he then praise them?

"We should be very proud of the men and women of our military who are serving our country overseas. These brave Americans constitute the finest fighting force in the world and we owe them our deepest gratitude and support. My thoughts are with them and their families. To the families of the soldiers who have died in the line of duty, I offer my sincere condolences. Words cannot adequately express our country's appreciation for your sacrifice. In wartime we Americans pull together. We support our troops and we all try to do our part to ensure the war's rapid and successful conclusion."

Of course he's a hypocrite; after all, he's a Democrat.

[solo gringo]

I read the post and before i came to the part where it said democrat i had already come to conclusion he was a slmy dembulb.This is the people that is suppose to lead this country.I hope the fleas of hundred camel invest your arm pits.

[governsleastgovernsbest]

ping

[AuH2ORepublican]

Hinchey is a traitor, pure and simple. We need to take him out in November of 2004. Has anybody heard about what Republican may challenge Hinchey? His stupid, un-American comments have given us an opening. He sits in a district that's not all that Democratic by New York standards (in spite of the fact that the Ithaca portion of the district is hopelessly liberal), so it's definitely doable. Bush got 42% of the vote in 2000 (a higher poercentage than in Republican Jack Quinn's district and slightly lower than in 3 other NY districts won by the GOP in either 2000 or 2002), but Bush should get around 50% in 2004 because of the importance of traditionally Republican issues such as national security.

Let's not just complain about Hinchey, let's send him packing!

[OldFriend]

Would the ba$tard care to stand before the families of those thousands killed in the 9/11 attacks and tell them they are now afforded an opportunity for insight?

[Behind Liberal Lines]

ping

[Gritty]

"Meester Hinchey, I curse your moustache!!"

[gridlock]

They (the events of 9/11) caused us to ask ourselves, "why?" Why does anyone hate us so much as to do this to us and to themselves? It was a natural and intensely human response and it was being asked by people of every status and station.

Maybe it's just me, but I never once asked myself that question. I already know the "what" and the "what to do about it", so why do I need to get all bent out of shape about the "why"?

For one reason or another, our adversary wants us dead, and will violate every norm of civilized behavior to make it so. We, on the other hand, don't want to be dead (obviously), so now we need to do what we need to do. A whole lot of navel gazing about whether or not our policy on the Gaza was provacative or if we had been supportive enough of this or that faction in the Middle East is useless speculation.

The fact of the matter is that certain states in the Middle East have found it advantageous to harbor and sustain fundamentalist Islamic terrorists, so now we have to make it advantageous for them to stop. Or eliminate them. Whatever.