Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

INTERVIEW-Saddam's bunkers said "impossible" to destroy
Reuters | 3/25/03 | Nedim Dervisbegovic

Posted on 03/25/2003 10:17:25 AM PST by kattracks

INTERVIEW-Saddam's bunkers said "impossible" to destroy

By Nedim Dervisbegovic

SARAJEVO, March 25 (Reuters) - Underground bunkers built for Iraqi President Saddam Hussein can resist massive bombardment and those hiding inside could survive for up to six months, a retired Yugoslav army officer who helped build them said.

"I believe that if Saddam does not leave, and I think he has nowhere to go, they will find him in one of these facilities -- if he does not find a way out by then," retired Lieutenant Colonel Resad Fazlic told Reuters in an interview on Tuesday.

"These bunkers can resist a direct hit of a 20 kilotonne- strong bomb or atomic bomb impact and keep those inside independent of the outside world for six months," said Fazlic, who oversaw the building of the bunkers in the late 1970s.

U.S.-led forces started their six-day-old air and land assault aimed at ousting the Iraqi leader by hitting his compound in Baghdad.

It was not clear if the compound that was hit was one of the two in the Iraqi capital that, Fazlic said, were built on purpose for the Iraqi leader.

"I did not take part in the building of this bunker, code-named "2000," but I know it is larger than others, about the size of a soccer pitch, and has everything he might need for a longer stay inside," Fazlic said, referring to one of the Iraqi leader's bunkers.

Fazlic said underground concrete fortresses were built by the former Yugoslav military in the cities of Baghdad, Mosul, Kirkuk, Basra and Nassiriya after Iraqi officials toured similar facilities in former Yugoslavia.

"We also built the so-called "zero," "P" and "C" types of bunkers which were smaller and meant for the military, communications centres and so on but can also resist heavy bombardment and longer isolation," he said.

Fazlic said he took part in the building of more than a dozen underground bunkers in former Yugoslavia which was then led by late President Josip Broz Tito, who had warm relations with Saddam Hussein.

"We built all of these facilities in Iraq because they liked what they saw here," Fazlic said, citing a large bunker dug into a mountain near the southern Bosnian town of Konjic that was meant for the former Yugoslav government in case of war.

DIFFICULT TERRAIN

"It was a little bit more difficult in Iraq because of the flat terrain. But you would use a valley, dig at the bottom of a hill, build a bunker and than cover it so it can't be spotted from outside," he said.

"The most important thing was to design the main bunker and all those layers above it which were the main protection. Even if you only had to penetrate the main bunker with a missile it would have to impact it at the angle of 90 degrees, otherwise it would ricochet off its rounded surface," he said.

"But before that, it would have to go through protective layers...and to calculate all the right angles for impact and fire several successful hits in line is almost impossible," he added.

The bunkers also had their own air filtration systems and alternative exits in case the main entrance was blocked. They could only be opened from inside, Fazlic said.

03/25/03 13:01 ET


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: balkans; decapitation; warlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-118 next last

1 posted on 03/25/2003 10:17:25 AM PST by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Good, then we can seal all exits and let the bastard rott.
2 posted on 03/25/2003 10:19:49 AM PST by observer5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Interesting. But, technology has changed and getting a guided weapon to hit a very specific point, at an oblique angle, is possible. Let's wait and see.
3 posted on 03/25/2003 10:19:56 AM PST by ConservativeVoice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
INTERVIEW-Saddam's bunkers said "impossible" to destroy

Mr. Saddam Hussein, may I introduce Mr. MOAB.
Mr. MOAB, please meet Mr. Saddam Hussein.

4 posted on 03/25/2003 10:21:14 AM PST by Hodar (With Rights, comes Responsibilities. Don't assume one, without assuming the other.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Query: Does Saddam have sufficient equipment inside to help him burrow through, say, about 10 feet of reinforced concrete if we should decide to seal him inside his bunkers from the outside?
5 posted on 03/25/2003 10:21:35 AM PST by PackerBoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Don't you just love Reuters? If there's anything they can find that appears bad for the war effort or America, they're going to print it. And it's extremely doubtful that those bunkers are impervious with our technology.
6 posted on 03/25/2003 10:22:25 AM PST by xJones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Six months? I can wait. (not)

Go get the SOB.

7 posted on 03/25/2003 10:22:44 AM PST by stboz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Hmm, does it float? A little Army Corps of Engineers river diversion project should do the trick...
8 posted on 03/25/2003 10:22:49 AM PST by talleyman (God Bless the USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PackerBoy
I like the way you think. :o)
9 posted on 03/25/2003 10:23:29 AM PST by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: PackerBoy
Would not thermal imaging technology detect changes in temperature around air ducts and other means of egress?
10 posted on 03/25/2003 10:23:39 AM PST by gov_bean_ counter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: xJones
1970 bunkers, 2003 technology. Nuff said.
11 posted on 03/25/2003 10:24:27 AM PST by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: talleyman
And they said there were no more major water projects to build. LOL.
12 posted on 03/25/2003 10:24:57 AM PST by gov_bean_ counter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: kattracks; BlueLancer; Poohbah; general_re
Saddam's bunkers said "impossible" to destroy

An hazardous word, especially for inhabitants of that bunker.

13 posted on 03/25/2003 10:25:35 AM PST by dighton (Amen-Corner Hatchet Team, Nasty Little Clique)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Pre-buried?

How accommodating.

14 posted on 03/25/2003 10:26:03 AM PST by N. Theknow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"Impossible to destroy" I bet our military folks have a chuckle over that. Even if it were really secure, it still takes power and even generators need to breath and let out exhaust - seems like there would be several ways to get them even if we didn't do the "impossible".
15 posted on 03/25/2003 10:26:09 AM PST by trebb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Impossible huh?


16 posted on 03/25/2003 10:26:23 AM PST by jbstrick (Behold the Power of CHEESE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
These bunkers can resist a direct hit of a 20 kilotonne- strong bomb or atomic bomb

IIRC, we exceeded that by several orders of magnitude 50 years ago on a little island in the South Pacific called Elugalab, which doesn't happen to exist anymore. With a little luck, maybe the ordnance guys loading the B-52 bomb racks at Fairfield and Diego Garcia may have goofed and left one of them on board ...

17 posted on 03/25/2003 10:26:53 AM PST by bassmaner (Let's take back the word "liberal" from the commies!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Underground bunkers built for Iraqi President Saddam Hussein can resist massive bombardment and those hiding inside could survive for up to six months

Perfect. Let's take him hostage back.

18 posted on 03/25/2003 10:27:15 AM PST by The Great Satan (Revenge, Terror and Extortion: A Guide for the Perplexed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Yeah, right. We are Americans, land of the free, home of the brave, the land of the best and the brightest. If we want to destroy those bunkers, they will be destroyed.
19 posted on 03/25/2003 10:27:15 AM PST by tiki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jbstrick
My thoughts exactly.
20 posted on 03/25/2003 10:27:56 AM PST by workerbee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-118 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson