Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Several U.S. Troops Die in Iraqi Ambushes
AP | 3/23/03 | ELLEN KNICKMEYER

Posted on 03/23/2003 3:23:15 PM PST by kattracks

Several U.S. Troops Die in Iraqi Ambushes

By ELLEN KNICKMEYER .c The Associated Press

NASIRIYAH, Iraq (AP) - The fiercest fighting yet in the battle for Iraq flared Sunday near this city on the Euphrates River. By ambush and faked surrender, Iraqi forces killed, wounded and captured Americans - and some of them, alive and dead, were exhibited on Iraqi television.

The firefights at Nasiriyah drew some attention from the relentless advance of the U.S.-led forces, now less than 100 miles from Baghdad after four days of the ground war. Scores of American military personnel landed in Kurdish territory, as the move to open a northern front gathered strength.

``I think we're advancing more rapidly than anyone could have expected,'' said U.S. Maj Gen. Daniel P. Leaf, who coordinates the coalition's air campaign.

But at Nasiriyah - 233 miles southeast of Baghdad, near the ancient town of Ur, birthplace of the patriarch Abraham - the allied juggernaut sustained its worst casualties so far.

And in the face of that resistance, Marines officials said they expected to move around Nasiriyah rather than through it on their march to Baghdad.

American authorities detailed two bloody battles, both near Nasiriyah:

Marines encountered Iraqi troops who appeared to be surrendering. Instead, they attacked - the start of a ``very sharp engagement,'' said Lt. Col. John Abizaid, deputy commander of the Central Command.

These were, Abizaid said, a combination of regular and irregular forces - in fact, he said, it was one of the few times regular Iraqi soldiers have fought, instead of surrendering or deserting.

In the end, the Americans triumphed, knocking out eight tanks, some anti-aircraft batteries, some artillery and infantry, Abizaid said. But victory came at a cost: as many as nine dead, and an undisclosed number of wounded.

A six-vehicle Army supply convoy apparently took a wrong turn, ventured into dangerous territory and was ambushed. The vehicles were destroyed, and a dozen soldiers were missing; it was believed that it was they who were shown on Iraqi TV, some of them dead in a morgue and the others interviewed.

Four others were wounded, and were evacuated later by Marines passing by.

The battles underscored the risks of the mission in Iraq, but U.S. military leaders insisted that they would not slow the drive to Baghdad.

Officials would not say when they expected to arrive at the capital city.

Long columns of Marines and their equipment advanced along the main road from Kuwaiti border to Nasiriyah, where units were crossing the Euphrates.

Part of the 3rd Infantry Division had reached the area of the Shiite holy city of Najaf - further ahead from Nasiriyah in the approach to Baghdad - after a 230-mile, 40-hour sprint through the desert, killing 100 machinegun-toting militiamen along the way.

When more than 30 Iraqi armored vehicles were spotted heading toward the 2nd Brigade's positions, air support was called in; A-10s and B-52s hammered the Iraqis, and the Army didn't have to fire a shot.

Allied aircraft had flown more than 6,000 sorties, softening resistance in advance of the ground war and focusing on Saddam Hussein's elite Republican Guard.

Pilots who hit Baghdad on Sunday said ground fire was lighter than expected.

``It was less than the first night,'' said Lt. j.g. Scott Worthington, 25, an F/A-18 Hornet pilot from Seattle, Wash., and assigned to Strike-Fighter Squadron 151. ``I'd say tonight was less intense. Not nearly as much.''

In the north, airstrikes were reported against strongholds of Ansar al-Islam, a militant Islamic group with alleged ties to al-Qaida and Baghdad. Bursts of anti-aircraft fire were heard from the direction of Mosul, and Iraqi television reported that Saddam's hometown, Tikrit, had been bombed several times.

Kurdish officials reported that scores of American military personnel had landed in the northern zone they control. Abizaid would only say forces were ``reinforcing our presence and targeting elements of regime support units in the Republican Guard.''

In western Iraq, he said, the forces went after Iraqi logistical targets, command and control facilities and commando units.

Authorities said the number of Iraqi prisoners in allied custody was about 2,000. About 200 were being held at the Tillil Air Base, a dilapidated complex near Nasiriyah that has been idle since 1991.

Sgt. 1st Class William Jordan of St. Mary's Court, Md., guarded three rectangular prisoner pens surrounded by concertina wire.

The prisoners sat impassively as identification tags were pinned on them. Most wore green Iraqi military uniforms, but some were also dressed in civilian clothing, including jogging suits and traditional Arab robes and headdress.

They were given MREs and water; ultimately, they were expected to be moved toward Kuwait for ``processing,'' interrogation by military intelligence officials.

The war continued to be a strange mix. There was tough resistance in some spots, but there was none at all in others.

As soldiers from the 101st Airborne division moved through the Iraqi desert, villagers lined up along the highway to greet the troops with two pressing questions: Are you friendly? And is food coming?

Through an interpreter, Col. Michael Linnington assured village leaders that U.S. forces were indeed friendly and that U.N. relief workers would bring food.

``We are here to help return the country to the way it used to be. we are here to help the Iraqi people. That's it. And to take out Saddam's government,'' Linnington said.

Villagers peered with curiosity at the soldiers - many waved and smiled. One young boy saluted to the troops; another said ``welcome'' in English. Their leaders nodded enthusiastically when they heard that food would arrive soon.


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: kia; nasiriyah; roadtobaghdad; warlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last

1 posted on 03/23/2003 3:23:15 PM PST by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kattracks
This "fake surrender" defies belief. At most it will allow them to knock out a couple of our guys before they are destroyed. And lots of conscripts who genuinely want to surrender may be killed instead. Real smart.
2 posted on 03/23/2003 3:29:00 PM PST by PianoMan (Liberate the Axis of Evil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
America's tombstone will read: "At least we were politically correct"
3 posted on 03/23/2003 3:29:19 PM PST by Captainpaintball (Our enemies are using our media to destroy us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
The ghouls will be here any minute demanding to see the bodies to 'motivate them' or 'get their blood pressure up' or to get 'pissed off'.
4 posted on 03/23/2003 3:29:28 PM PST by Trust but Verify
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PianoMan
Didnt a Republican Guard division try the same thing in the last war?
5 posted on 03/23/2003 3:30:04 PM PST by Husker24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
By ambush and faked surrender, Iraqi forces killed, wounded and captured Americans

BUT THEN.......

Their leaders nodded enthusiastically when they heard that food would arrive soon.

Did anyone else juxtapose these two portions...?

6 posted on 03/23/2003 3:32:08 PM PST by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PianoMan
Didn't the Taliban pull some of the same fake-surrender tricks? Wasn't that the episode where the CIA agent was killed and Taliban Johnny was picked up?
7 posted on 03/23/2003 3:32:24 PM PST by Anamensis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
How can these pro-iraq bastards keep protesting after this and the pow's and the russians??? These people are sick these commy networks other then fox sickens me. I am pissed off. No more prisoners!!!!!!
8 posted on 03/23/2003 3:32:41 PM PST by Brimack34
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Husker24
I don't remember myself (I was 18), but I'm sure someone here knows.
9 posted on 03/23/2003 3:33:20 PM PST by PianoMan (Liberate the Axis of Evil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
I guess we're sort of like a realllly reckless pizza delivery boy...?
10 posted on 03/23/2003 3:33:24 PM PST by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anamensis
Did they? I thought that was kind of a prison revolt.
11 posted on 03/23/2003 3:33:42 PM PST by PianoMan (Liberate the Axis of Evil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Fake surrenders are the textbook example of violations of armed conflict. If we wern't trying to win the hearts & minds of the civilian populace, it would be time to unleash hell.
12 posted on 03/23/2003 3:34:26 PM PST by Archie Bunker on steroids
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PianoMan
>>>This "fake surrender" defies belief.

Come on. This type of ruse is used in all military conflicts. Nothing new.

13 posted on 03/23/2003 3:34:55 PM PST by Reagan Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Husker24
Didnt a Republican Guard division try the same thing in the last war?

Yes, they did. Iraqi tankers would travel with the turrets faced to the rear, get the Americans all comfy, and then go into action.

I remember that pretty clearly.

14 posted on 03/23/2003 3:34:59 PM PST by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
They should be given 2 hours to surrender. If after that amount of time and they don't give up, bring in the artillery and bombs.

These "fake" surrenders will cost us more. Stop being so cautious.

15 posted on 03/23/2003 3:36:12 PM PST by LdSentinal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PianoMan
Exactly. The poor bastards who really want to surrender are going to pay the price. Better them than us.
16 posted on 03/23/2003 3:37:09 PM PST by ItisaReligionofPeace ((the original))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Husker24
Yes. I read they used tanks. I'm afraid all the talk of how much they will surrender isn't that helpful.
17 posted on 03/23/2003 3:37:44 PM PST by ItisaReligionofPeace ((the original))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: kattracks; *war_list; W.O.T.; 11th_VA; Libertarianize the GOP; Free the USA; knak; Peach; ...
OFFICIAL BUMP(TOPIC)LIST
18 posted on 03/23/2003 3:38:17 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (Where is Saddam?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Captainpaintball
"America's tombstone will read: "At least we were politically correct"

You nailed that one.

19 posted on 03/23/2003 3:38:38 PM PST by xJones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Archie Bunker on steroids
Many more of these things and it is time to unleash hell. Is our goal to liberate the Iraqi people or to remove Saddam's military and political leadership? The answer will guide us to do what is needed to be done.
20 posted on 03/23/2003 3:39:43 PM PST by ItisaReligionofPeace ((the original))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson